Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Gun owners read

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by M&P Shooter, Apr 7, 2010.

  1. 8-Ball

    8-Ball Old Soul

    Likes Received:
    Aug 30, 2004
    When I say "Molon Labe", I mean it.

    It's not just a cool saying.

  2. conservativenut


    Likes Received:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Any chance that you could give this to us w/o facebook. Please keep in mind that not all of us use facebook. Thanks!
  3. goldwing1555


    Likes Received:
    Dec 5, 2009
    Salem, OH.
    From Facebook

    Alan's Notes|Notes about Alan|Alan's Profile
    The Next Program Shoved Down Our Throats: Stealth Gun Control, UN-StyleShare
    Monday, March 22, 2010 at 3:23pm
    Obama “Discovers” A “Legal” (But Traitorous and UnConstitutional) Way Around The 2nd Amendment From His Internationalist Handlers, And Moves Quickly To Use It.

    On Wednesday March 17th, the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

    UN Gun Grabbers see the last five minutes of the video Defending America: The Second Amendment Today on

    The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws.

    What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

    This is not a joke. As sure as government health care has been forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so likewise, will gun control and confiscation.

    Full Article Here: (And below)

    U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
    Arshad Mohammed
    Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
    The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."
    "Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.
    While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.
    "The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.
    However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."
    "Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.
    The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.
    Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.
    Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.
    The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.
    Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.
    The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

    America's National Guard: A New Role - Disarming Americans

    The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.
    A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.
    (Editing by Eric Beech)

    Confiscated Guns in New Orleans- A Prelude to America's Future
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2010
  4. Diesel_Bomber


    Likes Received:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Ditto, no social networking sites for me. Can you C&P it into a post?

    ETA: Damn, while typing the above, Goldwing did so.
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2010
  5. GlockPreacher


    Likes Received:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Strasburg, PA
    Dang! Here goes the ammo supply again!!!
  6. jlday70

    jlday70 Oompa Loompa

    Likes Received:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Western NY
    Well the only saving grace may be the corrupt senate...Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't it take a 2/3 vote to ratify a treaty?
  7. gearjammer351

    gearjammer351 EnemyOfTheState

    Likes Received:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Amen brother.

    Just like Obama said re: repealing the health-care reform bill-

    “Bring it on”
  8. timbob


    Likes Received:
    Nov 30, 2009