close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Gun Control Essay

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by R4lf, Oct 30, 2011.

  1. R4lf

    R4lf

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norman, OK
    So I pride myself in the ability to read and discover both sides of an argument. With that in mind I in now way support what this individual wrote or think anyone should support him in any way, but I did read his essay and I was looking for some opinions from my fellow 2A supporters.

    http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~zj5j-gttl/guns.htm

    If you happen to know of any forums that are strictly anti-gun mssion oriented let me know. I enjoy learning from my enemies. ;)


    V/R,
    R4lf
     
  2. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,140
    Likes Received:
    3,819
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    No offense but why bother?
     

  3. R4lf

    R4lf

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norman, OK
    None taken, one of my closer friends says the same thing to me when I bring it up. I personaly find it easier to make my decisions, large or small, when I get all the facts. I find the concept so alien to me that not all people have guns. I knew of only one weapon in my house and I never interacted with it. Now that I'm older I am being more weapon friendly than the majority of my extended family.


    V/R,
    R4lf
     
  4. MinervaDoe

    MinervaDoe

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    10,874
    Likes Received:
    3,874
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    It's really pretty simple. Read John Lott's book "More Guns, Less Crime." It proves that concealed carry decreases crime. I find liberals to be very hostile and closed minded on the subject though.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  5. R4lf

    R4lf

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norman, OK
    Oh no, Kim isn't such a bad guy. He's just not understood.


    V/R,
    R4lf
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  6. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    That collection of essays is actually on the somewhat "reasonable" side of advocacy of limitations on civilian firearm ownership. It needs some updating, even given the probable politics of its authors.

    It devotes considerable space to the supposed "collective right" doctrine. That "collective" theory of the second amendment is now dead. ALL opinions in Heller and MacDonald affirmed the "individual" nature of the 2nd amendment; the 5-4 splits in both decisions concerned the level of allowable limitations on that individual right. The "collective" theory had a potent run in its era, but anyone now supporting it after two US Supreme Court decisions UNANIMOUSLY rejecting it is more ideologue than legal observer.

    The "balancing of interests" advocacy is a tactic FAVORED when trying to advance restrictions one favors, and OPPOSED when facing restrictions one dislikes. There are many issues on which many, left or right, would outright reject a "balance of interests" argument.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  7. PAGunner

    PAGunner

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    "Hand grip ID tagging"? LMAO, Oh this guy who wrote the essay is definitely a stoner, that sounds like something a stoner would come up with after taking one too many hits from the bong!
     
  8. Lior

    Lior GUNS=FREEDOM

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,661
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Israel
    If you're interested in reasonable gun control, how about the idea of keeping dangerous criminals away from guns, i.e. by keeping them in prisons and morgues?
     
  9. R4lf

    R4lf

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norman, OK
    Oh no, that makes too much sense. I always thought you were innocent until PROVEN guilty. Now and days it seems more innocent people are being convicted everyday.


    V/R,
    R4lf
     
  10. TexasFats

    TexasFats NRA, TSRA, SAF

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Proper gun control in five steps.

    1. Take a well-balanced power stance.

    2. Get both hands high on the handgun.

    3. Use a strong, two-handed grip.

    4. Focus on the front sight.

    5. Good trigger control.

    Means that you will hit where you aim.

    Learned that from one of Mas Ayoob's books.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  11. tshadow6

    tshadow6

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    0
    That essay seems obsolete. It mentions support for the Brady Bill. It also cites the Supreme Court has not issued a ruling concerning the 2nd Amendment. Also, it appears to be written by a Japanese person. The Japanese are primarily a knife culture with a higher suicide rate than the United States.
     
  12. unit1069

    unit1069

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,426
    Likes Received:
    354
    Location:
    So. Central US
    To quote another GT member who's already replied, "Why bother?"

    The author immediately sidesteps the fact that the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment is an individual right of all law-abiding US citizens. This constitutional right includes handguns as well as rifles and shotguns. The fact that the author ignores this fact by resorting to the "not an absolute right" means next to nothing in my opinion, any more than shouting, "Fire", in a crowded theatre without just cause voids our First Amendment rights.

    The author apparently has put a lot of effort into his web site but his anti-rights position and the method by which he seeks to argue for his specious position is slipshod and smacks of pandering to acceptable Leftist attitudes and agendas.

    Why bother when you have the Heller and McDonald USSC decisions to read and offer for all Americans?
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  13. DaneA

    DaneA

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chattanooga
    If you know what the other side is thinking it is easier to battle them
     
  14. mt920

    mt920

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    185
    Location:
    Somewhere near Chicago
    I understand and agree with your approach... I plan to read the essay with an open mind; however, it won't sway my opinion about guns.
     
  15. Spats McGee

    Spats McGee

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    202
    Location:
    Arkansas
    The essays has more flaws than I really care to go into, but I'll name a few:

    1) No mention of Heller or McDonald, or any of the other 2A cases out there.

    2) The old "occupants in a house with a gun are 43x more likely . . . " line. I thought that number had been thoroughly debunked.

    3) The claim that a national registration system "would prevent [some of the illegal gun trafficking] by scaring those 'friends' into not buying the guns legally and selling them illegally, for if the guns are used in an illegal crime, that person can be held accountable." This makes no sense, and it's flat wrong, IMO. What he's talking about already sounds like a straw purchase to me, and those are already illegal. Besides, if someone's already willing to do a straw purchase for a buddy, he's probably not above filing a false police report and claiming that the gun got stolen, too.
     
  16. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    1) That essay was put out before Heller was decided; on the internet, old info becomes immortal.

    2) That "40-odd times more likely" shtick is one of the three classic statistical warp jobs that have lives of their own. If the shooter is even an ACQUAINTANCE of the person shot, then the shooting counts in that classification. That means that two thugs that know each other's names and have met just once fall into that juicy classification.
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2011
  17. Spats McGee

    Spats McGee

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    202
    Location:
    Arkansas
    That's kind of what I figured. I should have added "and should be updated," I guess.
     
  18. Lord

    Lord Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,005
    Likes Received:
    624
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    He says:

    "The moral arguments why the 2nd is not absolute

    First, it important to note that no right is absolute, even those supposedly granted by God and guaranteed in the Bill of Rights."

    Do I not have the right to live and breathe? Is that not an absolute right?

    The guy's a moron.
     
  19. DaneA

    DaneA

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chattanooga
    Nope we have the death penalty to deal with that.
     
  20. DaneA

    DaneA

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chattanooga

    Nor should it. If anything you should be able to strengthen your stance by being able to have an intelligent counter argument.