close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Glock Shock buffers

Discussion in 'GSSF' started by dking1, Apr 7, 2007.

  1. dking1

    dking1

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    Is or has anyone tried or currently using a "Shock buffer" in their glock?
     
  2. Don At PC

    Don At PC Senior Member Millennium Member

    Messages:
    5,227
    Likes Received:
    8
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    Location:
    USA
    I don't use one and never have. I did a search but only came up with your post on the topic. I know there were at one time several posts on G/T on this very subject. The general opinion from them was: Save your money. Several folks had reliability issues after installing them. I definately would not recommend them.;)
     

  3. Houngan

    Houngan

    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    I have a Dawson, and honestly I can't tell the difference. At 170pf, I just don't know that a long gun like a G35 is really hitting the frame that hard to begin with.

    I could, however, notice a big difference in my Beretta 96 Elite II with a Dawson shock buffer.

    H.
     
  4. Pharaoh

    Pharaoh

    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Location:
    North West Florida the Panhandle
    If you are shooting hand loads I don't this I would worry too much. Now if I was shooting only +P or +P+ rounds then maybe I would think about giving one a try. Maybe maybe not.

    Pharaoh:supergrin:
     
  5. DannyR

    DannyR Moderator Millennium Member

    Messages:
    20,048
    Likes Received:
    340
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    Location:
    Stuarts Draft, Virginia
    Use of one in GSSF would require you to shoot in Unlimited category.
     
  6. dking1

    dking1

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    The thought was to add one of the buffers to my unlimited gun using a heavily reduced recoil spring.

    The theory would be to reduce the felt recoil by reducing the time/force duration yet try to safe guard the frame from being battered by the slide.

    Final thoughts...I'll just spend the money on more ammo.
     
  7. Custom Glock Racing

    Custom Glock Racing I did it first. Millennium Member

    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Location:
    Arizona
    Totally unnecessary, pretty much useless and they tend to cause slides to short stroke.
     
  8. Norske

    Norske Millennium Member

    Messages:
    3,454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    I tried them back in my 1911 days. I could not detect any significant difference, and as they wore out they would deform and start causing function problems. I gave up on them.

    Unlike metal-framed guns like the 1911, the Glock is designed TO flex somewhat under recoil.

    That is why you get the "marks" on the bottom of Glock .40 slides that a lot of people are needlessly concerned about. When the frame flexes the top of the locking block hits the bottom of the slide. This leaves the marks but does no damage.

    Some recoil energy is absorbed by this flexing, so that energy is NOT transferred to the shooter as additional recoil.

    It stands to reason that any kind of "shock buffer" that is designed to reduce "shock" can only change the "equation" of how the frame is designed to flex, and change it for the worse.

    I would stay away from them.

    IMNSHO. YMMV.

    ;)