Glock and H&K

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by GLOCKinBABY, Mar 23, 2005.

  1. GLOCKinBABY

    GLOCKinBABY

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Is H&K a better quality weapon than Glock? Reliability, controls, accuracy, ruggedness..etc..
     
  2. joegerardi

    joegerardi Lifetime Member Millennium Member

    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    May 18, 1999
    Location:
    Savannah, GA, USA
    That's a hard call. H&K might have it in the accuracy dept. because Glocks never attemted to be anything more than "combat accurate," but there are some people that can shoot Glocks better than H&K's.

    Reliability- both are renowned for reliability

    Controls- Shooter's choice.

    It really comes down to what blows your skirt up.

    ..Joe
     

  3. JTG30

    JTG30 INGO

    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
  4. bac1023

    bac1023

    Messages:
    112,276
    Likes Received:
    11,002
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Location:
    PA
    I think they are, but that's only my opinion. HK happens to be my favorite gun manufacturer.
     
  5. wade farley

    wade farley Sonic 357 sig

    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Location:
    kent, Wa.
    :cool: Ditto!;f Have fun & stay safe!;f
     
  6. HAMMERHEAD

    HAMMERHEAD

    Messages:
    3,497
    Likes Received:
    53
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I am a plastic molder by trade and I think the plastic H&K uses in the USP line is a little better than Glocks. The metal precision seems a little better too.
    Ergonomics are a toss up/personal preference.
    Accuracy edge goes to H&K, especially in .45acp and .40s&w.
    In my experience reliability is clearly in favor of H&K. My much loved Glock 20/10mm has been giving me problems with the new full cap. mags.
    My USP .40 has been flawless and handles the .40s&w with more accuracy and less recoil than a Glock 22/35.
     
  7. Pred8tory

    Pred8tory Retired Copper Lifetime Member

    Messages:
    791
    Likes Received:
    47
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Location:
    Metro Cleveland
    I own several Glocks and an H&K P2000 and while I like the H&K a lot, I'll never buy another. H&K's customer relations makes Glock look warm and fuzzy. At least you can buy parts for a Glock. Try finding a flush magazine floorplate for the P2000. My dealer can't get em, H&K doesn't answer email on their webpage and I've searched the internet. H&K charges a lot for their pistols,they should support them. They've lost a customer in me.
     
  8. litework

    litework

    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    51
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    VA
    Have you ever tried emailing Glock? Does Glock even have an email address or a 1-800 number? I will not buy another Glock until they update their craptacular webpage to include the latest pisols they offer. They've clearly shunned this responsibility and lost at least one G37 sale because of it. I consider that to be very poor customer service.

    Although I've owned more Glocks than HK, I think the HK offering is a little better. I'm not sure it's the quality of the weapon. Glock obviously likes having cheap slide releases or catches, sights and guide rods on their guns. They don't have an ambidextrous magazine release. This doesn't hinder the performance of the weapon much and they can pass these cost savings onto the customer. A lot of people appreciate this. I consider it cheap. I'll pay more for these features, whether it be shelling out the dough in the aftermarket on the Glock or scraping together the extra cash to buy the USP.
     
  9. oldsmith

    oldsmith

    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2001
    I sent Kimber an e-mail with photo's of the problem and a nice clear write-up - they never responded. When I followed up with a written letter about a week later with the exact same info, they called the morning they got it. I'll bet gun manufacturers get flooded with emails. That's no excuse for poor customer service. If they can't support the medium, they shouldn't use it.
     
  10. cole

    cole Millennium Member

    Messages:
    3,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 1999
    LINK

    To answer your question, based off owning AND extensively shooting a Glock 23 and USP40cV1:
    Reliability = similar, edge to Glock over time due to simpler design
    Controls = Glock, HK has more that are not needed... more to break
    Accuracy = same, both defensive accuracy
    Ruggedness = Glock, fewer moving parts needed for gun to fire.

    The HKUSP40c was the better made gun, tighter tolerances, better fit. But, for me, the Glock has the edge. The HK trigger sucks completely, even the LEM (long reset) is not great compared to the Glock stock.

    Traded the USP40c on my (second) new Glock 23. Glock is all about utility 100%. I choose Glock because they're simple, cheap and they work.
     
  11. whatsit?

    whatsit? Mall Ninja

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Location:
    Deep in the recesses of my mind.

    In a word - YES
     
  12. Pred8tory

    Pred8tory Retired Copper Lifetime Member

    Messages:
    791
    Likes Received:
    47
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2002
    Location:
    Metro Cleveland
    Yes, but at least you can easily buy parts for the Glock, you didn't address that aspect of H&K ownership. It's hard to find parts. As for the design, I'll give the edge to H&K on ergonomics, however their design is a big clunky and results in a much shorter barrel length in proportion to the size of the pistol when compared to a Glock. For example, a Glock 26 has a bout a 3.5" barrel, the hot new H&K P2000SK only has about a 2.5" barrel. What kind of ballistic performance are you going to get out of a 2.5" barrel? No thanks.
     
  13. los_hooligan

    los_hooligan I don't recall.

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    i've always liked the usp design compared to the glock. i had a glock that had a failure to fire and it ruined it for me.
     
  14. epsylum

    epsylum Boolit Hoze

    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Location:
    Racing Capital, USA
    They all have thier quirks. Glock offers a lot of gun for the money. HK and SIG are much nicer in many catagories, but they also cost almost twice as much. I have owned/do own all three (Glock, HK, SIG classic). I still love my Glock and do not regret purchasing any gun from any of those comapanies.

    Just remember one thing. It seems the more you pay for a gun, the more accessories cost. So it's expensive all over. I don't mind that too much, since I consider them the Ferrari of the auto handgun world, it would be like putting flying J gas in a Ferrari.

    Sorta think of the HK/SIG vs. Glock as Rolex/Tag Heuer (sp?)/Omega, etc. Vs. Timex. Both get the job done, it's just how fancy you want to be with it.
     
  15. HalfGlocked

    HalfGlocked

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Location:
    South-Central Indiana
    I had a usp .45 and got rid of it, in my experience with H&K
    they are reliable, accurate, and seemed tough enough, but the trigger reset was horrible.
     
  16. litework

    litework

    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    51
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    VA
    I didn't address it because I agree with you. HK parts are very expensive, especially for the newer P2000 series. As you said, you purchased a newly designed P2000 SK and you got the headaches that go with it. I hope that this platform will gain in popularity and create a demand and increase the supply for the parts you seek. I have been fortunate enough not to want to add anything to my HK (except a few ultra expensive magazines). It is great the way it is. I feel that the HK .45 is a lot less clunky than a Glock 20/21. I agree with you about the subcompact, as well. I won't wear anything smaller than a Glock 23 and have yet to find a subcompact I like, but 2.5" ain't much. The Glock 26 might be the lesser of two evils.

    I'm not a huge HK fan, but there have been some negative statements about HK that I have not found to be true. The USP does not cost twice as much as a Glock. My HK was priced within 200 bucks of my full sized Glock. The folks at HK do answer their email. I happened to email HK before work this moring (7:21AM)in an attempt to dispel an internet rumor about their warranty service, and I received a reply from them at 8:53AM. That's the quickest response I've received from anyone. Glock's unavailability to the consumer is very frustrating to me. The year Glock last updated their website would make a good answer to trivial pursuit question.
     
  17. Brander

    Brander

    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    I've found that H&K answers their email rapidly too. Also, talked to them on the phone once and they were very helpful.

    Never needed customer support with my Glocks, so no experience there.
     
  18. big68

    big68

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location:
    Missouri
    I just bought an HK USP 45, how bout posting some responses over at that thread. Just pimping my own thread. And it is my first HK so I am welcoming myself aboard.
     
  19. bunkerbuster

    bunkerbuster

    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2005
    Location:
    CO/CA
    well, as for me, I wanted these 3 pistols. Glock 19, H&K tactical and Sig-Sauer.

    I did get my glock 19 because I like the trigger.
    I am planning to get H&K Tactical, because people said it is more accurate than USP. (sadly, i only show usp, not tactical)
    I shot some sigs, and it is accurate.

    My point is, I bought a Glock 19 first, because of the price and the ergonomics.
     
  20. Duke of Lawnchair

    Duke of Lawnchair

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Location:
    Ridgecrest, CA
    The USP is a well made firearm as is the Glock.

    Although the USP40F was the first handgun I purchased, the ergonomics do not jive with me. I own one USP, couple of Sigs and a few Glocks.

    I thought I would never warm to the Glocks, but they are my "go to" handguns. Their ergonomics as well as the Sigs jive very well with me.

    I'm debating if I should get rid of the USP in favor for something else.

    -Jim