close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Glock 27 vs. MK40 vs Sig 239

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by DonB, Dec 14, 2003.

  1. DonB

    DonB

    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    I'M continuing my research on these three guns. I'm not able to rent any of them and have only shot the 27. Would like thoughts on which one of these three for conceled carry from someone who's fired all three.
     
  2. surfinusa

    surfinusa

    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    The 239 in 40 is my daily carry gun and probably the last gun I'd get rid of. Its accurate and easy to control, totally reliable. The G27 is also accurate and totally reliable. Its actually quite easy to shoot but not as easy as the 239. Of the three choices I would go with the SIG or Glock.
     

  3. logical

    logical

    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    MUCH smoother and easier to shoot accurately, IMO.

    But, having written this, I prefer the 26 to the 239/9.
     
  4. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    Messages:
    9,991
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    i had a G27 and just didn't like how it felt in my hands. got a XD9 sub and liked it better. got a Sig 239 on friday and took it to the range yesterday and LOVE it. when (if?) OH gets CCW, i was going to carry the XD9 sub, but that has now changed, i will most likely carry the P239 because it fets my hands better, and it recoils less.