Glock Forum - GlockTalk banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
For anyone who happens to have experience with both of these guns, which one feels better to shoot, in your opinion? (Trigger, recoil, grip/ergonomics, etc.)

I hear that the M&P has better ergonomics and provides a better grip, and is more naturally pointable than the Glock 26. I also hear that the Glock 26 supposedly has the better factory trigger.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
785 Posts
I know this wasn’t your question. I’m sure you have reasons for your criteria. The subcompact and the 26 are probably closer in size.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,461 Posts
The M&P 2.0 trigger break is a bit better IMO, but not by much. The Glock has a little shorter reset.
Yes, the 3.6" compact has a G19 sized grip, so is going to give more real estate for your hands.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
The M&P 2.0 trigger break is a bit better IMO, but not by much. The Glock has a little shorter reset.
Yes, the 3.6" compact has a G19 sized grip, so is going to give more real estate for your hands.
How does recoil compare?
 

·
Displaced Hillbilly
Joined
·
2,723 Posts
What do you prefer about the M&P?
Ergonomics mostly. Glocks give me slide bite if I don’t install a beaver tail back strap, trigger dingus irritates my trigger finger after shooting awhile. With M&P’s, I have no issue. Also accuracy. I am personally more accurate with M&P’s than Glocks. YMMV.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
328 Posts
If you would consider a springfield, they just (re)released their XDM compact. Now under the “Elite” tag. It has the modularity to be a duty-sized weapon as well as be a compact carry. It will also come with their new META trigger system. The reviews are quiet on it, but the one Elite I’ve seen in store was overbuilt, polished internally, and the XDM series has always had high marks for ergos and tight groups. But the M&P 2.0 compacts and subcompacts have amazing ergos as well.

you’ll be happy with either of your choices. Good holster and aftermarket support to both the 26 and M&P. Both companies have quality customer service. Both platforms are reliable when you need them to be. A very close friend of mine carries his M&P subcompact more than his other choices. In shooting thousands of rounds with him (before the virus) I have never seen that gun choke, its recoil impulse and low bore axis, like a glock, helped the shooter with followups. It was a very enjoyable subcompact pistol.

The Humble Marksman does make a point about buying glocks that I do feel is relevant. Glock ownership is part of an ecosystem. They host glock classes and armorers classes and they have their own practical shooting league. If you change sights or want to hot rod the gun at all, glock will be easier, IMO. Today my choice would be 26. If I went to the store and held both, tomorrow I might choose the M&P.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
328 Posts
Ergonomics mostly. Glocks give me slide bite if I don’t install a beaver tail back strap, trigger dingus irritates my trigger finger after shooting awhile. With M&P’s, I have no issue. Also accuracy. I am personally more accurate with M&P’s than Glocks. YMMV.
If you have a progressive nail file or some fine grain sandpaper, and a glock take down tool (or anything the like), you can fix that trigger dingus issue in minutes, or grab an aftermarket trigger shoe.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top