close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Gen4 Glock 26/27 Release Date

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by StewRacing, Mar 26, 2010.

  1. StewRacing

    StewRacing

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Any idea when this model may be released? Or will it?

    Thanks

    Mike
     
  2. DannyR

    DannyR Moderator Millennium Member

    Messages:
    20,075
    Likes Received:
    376
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    Location:
    Stuarts Draft, Virginia
    I know, but Gaston and Robert Glock swore me to secrecy.
     

  3. JBP55

    JBP55

    Messages:
    9,929
    Likes Received:
    457
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Christmas 2010?
     
  4. fuzzy03cls

    fuzzy03cls

    Messages:
    2,966
    Likes Received:
    109
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Location:
    Florida
    No release date given. It's more likely these will never see a gen 4. Doesn't make much sense to gen 4 these guns. They already have the dual recoil springs, How much grip can you really change when the grip is so small as it stands?
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
  5. StewRacing

    StewRacing

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Thats sorta how I felt. I just didn't want to buy a Gen3 then see a Gen4 come out and not have the newbie, lol. My hands are large enough that it won't matter.

    My biggest debate I am having with myself right now is that I want a pocket gun (PM9 - LCP - LCR - Sig p238) but I also like Glock 26/27 and the 3" - 1911's (not 380). I ask myself whether it is better to pocket carry or wear a G27 or 3" 1911 on the hip/IWB. What makes more sense and is better. What ever I get I like to shhot and be accurate. 380's don't do that for me as well.
     
  6. Pops 1

    Pops 1

    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Location:
    Central Louisiana
    +1....
     
  7. Rusty Shackleford

    Rusty Shackleford mmhmm

    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    They'd be absolutely stupid to leave the subcompacts as-is, and I don't think they will.

    The Gen4 is intended as a replacement for the Gen3, at least according to the Glock rep on video.

    Regardless of grip height, a subcompact still stands to benefit from 3 choices in length, front-to-back. If their competitors are doing it, I'm sure Glock will do it, and why not do it when you've already decided to announce a whole new "Generation."

    The Gen4 dual recoil spring is not the same as what is found in current subcompacts.

    The new texture appears to be intended as "standard" rather than optional.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
  8. fuzzy03cls

    fuzzy03cls

    Messages:
    2,966
    Likes Received:
    109
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Location:
    Florida
    From my inspection of a gen 4 22 & my 27 they seemed the same? Besides the size.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
  9. m44u

    m44u

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Location:
    na
    I don't like the rtf's glocks. I shot one the other day. Shot great . It's a Glock. but felt like I was holding a green pine cone
     
  10. JBP55

    JBP55

    Messages:
    9,929
    Likes Received:
    457
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Location:
    Louisiana
    They are different.
     
  11. GOA Guy

    GOA Guy

    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Location:
    Ohio
    IMHO If there is a size of Glocks in the whole line that really needs a choice of different backstraps it is the "babies".
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
  12. BleedNOrange

    BleedNOrange Go Vols

    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Location:
    Volunteer State
    +1 my px4 storm sub has adjustable back straps and it makes a big difference and allows for all types of hands.
     
  13. mauser.458

    mauser.458

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Absolutely correct! I love Glocks but I carry an M&P 9C because of the interchangable backstraps as I have small hands. I would buy a 4th Gen Glock 26 in a heartbeat!

    Those who say a tiny bit smaller size doesn't make a noticeable difference obviously don't have small hands. They don't have to worry about their guns not fitting their hands properly. It does make a big difference.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2010
  14. GoingQuiet

    GoingQuiet FFL/SOT

    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Location:
    Melbourne, FL
    The adjustable backstraps in my view seem like a great idea for the larger frame guns, but if you look at the MBS - the material added is what contacts the heel of your palm. On such a small framed gun like on the 26 and 27, I'd imagine that even a small addition to the backstrap will drastically change the way the gun points.

    Just my opinion.
     
  15. CharlestonG26

    CharlestonG26

    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    185
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I know a Myan guy (a former Spec Ops and LEO) who now works at Glock and he told me the release date was December 21, 2012.
     
  16. Frontiersman101

    Frontiersman101

    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Location:
    Cave Creek, AZ
    Isn't that the end of the world?:whistling:
     
  17. PaLEOjd

    PaLEOjd

    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    331
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I would like to see a Gen 4 baby glock. Glock already has them with the gen4 reversable/larger mag release. The rtf3 and "sf" style grip with mbs would be an improvement IMO. I just don't see the need for a larger mag release on such a small grip, seems like it would be in the way and easier to hit by "accident".
     
  18. the iceman

    the iceman Proud Veteran CLM

    Messages:
    7,741
    Likes Received:
    10
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    I don't see Glock doing a Gen 4 26/27/33 either. If you look at the history of the subcompacts, very very few minor changes were made throughout the years.
     
  19. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Messages:
    23,903
    Likes Received:
    5,585
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    I predict they'll eventually do all the models in Gen 4, though it may take 2-3 years. The ambi 26/27 mag release is important. And considering that many LE agencies go with full size for primary and subcompact for BUG I would suspect they would be pushing for commonality.

    We'll know for sure if/when we start seeing ambi mags for the subcompacts.
     
  20. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    Messages:
    23,903
    Likes Received:
    5,585
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    That's because the subs came out later and (I think) were basically called gen 2.5. So they haven't needed any updating over the years.

    I still say the ambi mag release feature alone is reason enough for a gen 4 subcompact. The main reason Glock did the gen 4 was to try to keep LE sales from eroding further. LE buys a lot of subcompacts and they will want them in gen 4 to match their full size gen 4s.