proof?A chopped 43x, using an aftermarket mag catch as well as aftermarket mags will not, and cannot, be as reliable as a Glock 26 in full oem configuration.
That is irrefutable.
But they don’t. At least they haven’t for me.I think he’s meaning that the Shield Arms mags make them less reliable rather then a stock 43x or 26.
So, no proof.I should not have to teach you how mechanical systems work. You are introducing additional failure points to the system. A Glock 26 has been around for decades. Time tested and proved out. You are taking a relatively new firearm, the 43x, changing a rather important physical dimension, and adding an unproven magazine from a manufacturer that has a rather brief track record.
How is that hard to understand?
Then show your proof.Empirically, I am not wrong.
That is conjecture. Fancy words do not make you correct. “It’s always worked this way” doesn’t make your correct. Glock parts can and do fail alongside their aftermarket counterpartsMy "proof" is the collective knowledge of how mechanical systems work over the history of forever. Do your own work and look up "interchangeability, validation, and calibration" in reference to engineering and statistics. Quit making yourself look foolish. I am done wallowing in the forum mud with you.
Which can be done by using a Shield magazine in a 43 with the OEM sized grip.Well it’s clearly not for you, it’s for people that want a 43 sized gun with more capacity.