close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

G30s vs. G30sf

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by nvsteve, May 22, 2013.

  1. nvsteve

    nvsteve

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N. Nevada
    Made up my mind to buy the sf until I read some reviews of the new 30s. The new one is difficult to find and getting premium prices. I can get an almost new Gen 3 sf for about $500 while the 30s is selling for list plus. Have any of you fired both? Is there a significant enough difference to get the 30s?
     
  2. GRT45

    GRT45 Transform & Win

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,121
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Texas
    I've owned a G30SF for several years and have field tested the G30S for two weeks with 250 rounds fired.

    My thoughts about the G30S are posted here: The New Glock 30S - Pros and Cons
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2017

  3. MarcDW

    MarcDW MDW Guns Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 1999
    Messages:
    3,723
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Maine USA
    The question is, do you want a shooter or CCW gun?
    While if you look for a shooter, you are better off with a 21.
     
  4. 9mmdude

    9mmdude

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2001
    Messages:
    1,807
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    USA
    I have both. I like the feel of the 30s better. Shooting vs. carrying the 30sf is a better range gun. I am keeping my 30sf to use in gssf.

    If it is for ccw get the 30s. If it is for fun doesnt matter which one.
     
  5. GRT45

    GRT45 Transform & Win

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,121
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Texas
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2017
  6. ron59

    ron59 Bustin Caps

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,927
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Smyrna, GA
    I agree with the thoughts before...

    if it is *primarily* for CCW, the G30S might be better as it's slightly slimmer.
    If you want to shoot it alot... the G30SF would probably be better.

    I've not shot a G30S personally, but read many who say the lighter slide & RSA combination of the G30S makes for a snappier and less pleasant recoil.

    I loved my G30SF, but had to sell it. :crying:
     
  7. 1canvas

    1canvas

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    The Great State of Ohio
    when I was faced with the choice and had both in front of me for about the same price I choose the 30sf and glad I did. that gun just plain shoots great. the slide is not that big of an issue for carrying and the frame and grip are the same thickness. its the thick grip that makes the gun feel thick.
     
  8. nvsteve

    nvsteve

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N. Nevada
    Thanks all for the replies.
     
  9. gpo1956

    gpo1956

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Arkansas
    I've had and shot both. I just like the 30S better for my needs.
     
  10. Mick45

    Mick45

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lake Worth, Florida
    The 30S is noticeably thinner and most importantly about 5 ounces lighter. That makes a big difference in a pocket all day. My new 30S with a 9 round mag, has replaced my little Springfield XDS .45 in my front pocket, as the Glock is actually lighter while carrying 4 extra rounds. The height is approximately identical with the 9rd mag, and the length is only about 1/2" longer. Best of all, the reloads are 13rd G21 mags. :)
     
  11. GRT45

    GRT45 Transform & Win

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,121
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Texas
    The G30S weighs 3.35 oz. less than the G30SF or G30 Gen4 using the data listed on the us.glock.com website as of 3/30/2017. With a full 10-rnd mag in the pistols, the G30S weighs ~11% less overall (30.36 oz vs. 33.71 oz). Many will like that the most about the G30S.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2017
  12. DrBob

    DrBob

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    I'm searching for a .45 Glock compact and currently own the G36 (which I like quite a ot but would like the extra capacity).

    The only differrence I can see is that the G30S is a bit lighter, and has a barrel height that is 2/3rd of the G30SF and G36(so, maybe less muzzle flip) and is a bit thinner at the slide.

    The objective differences are almost vanishngly small (except perhaps the barrel height). So what are the subjective differences or is there something that is not evident in the published specs that makes them different??
     
  13. 1canvas

    1canvas

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    The Great State of Ohio
    basically the G30S is a G36 slide and barrel on a G30sf frame. I'm not sure you posted the correct model numbers in your post and I'm not sure what you mean by barrel height:wavey:.
     
  14. Mick45

    Mick45

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lake Worth, Florida
    DrBob, I have carried both guns many thousands of hours, and I know that the measurements on paper do not differ much, but with a flush fitting 9 round mag, in a front pocket all day long, the difference, particularly in width and weight is the difference between the gun being an almost unpocketable brick that seems to weigh my pants down on one side, to being so comfortable to carry that I sometimes forget it's there. The measurements may not be that different, but it just "feels" and carry's a lot different. Hope this helps, Mick
     
  15. Mick45

    Mick45

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lake Worth, Florida
    To put a 10.5% difference in perspective........ Some may not think they would notice the difference, but if someone woke up tomorrow morning 10.5% shorter, I'm fairly sure they would notice, lol. That's going to bed 6' tall, and waking up under 5'5", lol!..... It's all in the perspective.
     
  16. DrBob

    DrBob

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    The barrel height is the distance between the bottom of the beaver tail and the top of the barrel. The greater the BH, the more flippy the gun is likely to feel.
     
  17. 1canvas

    1canvas

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    165
    Location:
    The Great State of Ohio
    between the two they should be the same.
     
  18. djegators

    djegators

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    The reduced barrel height does seem to make a difference. Overwhelming? No, but it does seem to compensate for the almost 4 oz weight reduction of the slide. The felt recoil seems to be more of a push into the hand.
     
  19. GRT45

    GRT45 Transform & Win

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    3,121
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Texas
    Don't be surprised if one or more of the barrel heights listed on the website are inaccurate. The barrel height for the G30S and G30 Gen4 are both listed at 20mm, yet the barrel height of the G30SF and G36 are listed at 32mm. Something is fishy with these numbers. It wouldn't be the first error on the website.

    Having shot the G30SF, G30S and now the G30 Gen4, I'm certain the G30S has no mechanical advantage to reduce recoil or muzzle rise, quite the opposite.

    @DrBob @djegators
    UPDATE (3/30/2017): The barrel heights listed on the us.glock.com website have been corrected. The barrel height for the G30SF, G30S, G30 Gen4, and G36 are all listed at 32mm.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2017
  20. djegators

    djegators

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    The numbers on the website may be inaccurate, I have seen several errors there myself. But it is quite evident that the bore axis is slightly lower on the 30S compared to 30/30SF. If you don't feel there is an advantage to that, that is your opinion.