Nonsense. there have been threads where the ones criticizing LE have been the cops while the non cops defended the officer(s) in question. Not frequently but it has happened. The main point of contention generally revolves around many non LEO's lack of knowledge about how police work is done. And why things are done that way. They think what they see on TV and in the movies is the way it's done. Plus they engage in after the fact judgments ignoring or rejecting the proper method of assessing the actions of the officer based on what the officer knew or reasonably suspected at the time he took action. Instead they want to make declarations based on the outcome when everything is known. That dog won't hunt, ones like Natty would go out of their way to post anti cop stuff or derail a thread with his anti LEO diatribes at every available opportunity. "Not agreeing with everything a police officer says" or not agreeing that police officers can do know wrong" is the bogus argument put forward by those that regularly get their views and claim refuted. By those that actually know what they are talking about.