Fairfield Cops Accused of Not Helping (drunk) Man After Crash

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Gallium, Feb 25, 2010.

  1. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Messages:
    28,686
    Likes Received:
    25
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    This is bull****. The police offered medical attention, he refused, and later died from ruptured stupidity (spleen).

    Fairfield I hope, has sent his estate bills for the actions they had to take resulting from his illegal activities.

    'Drew


     
  2. Officer X

    Officer X

    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Location:
    The Garden State
    What were the officers supposed to do?

    He refused medical attention but an officer was able to convince him to go to the hospital.

    If they forced him into the ambulance against his will and he lived, they would probably be suing for violating his civil rights.....
     

  3. ctaggart

    ctaggart

    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Of course they took appropriate action. Drive under the influence and suffer the consequences. The police have no responsibility to make sure you don't die. That's your own responsibility. Sure we can try, but there's no guarantee offered.
     
  4. k2nickmn83

    k2nickmn83

    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    im confused, SOOO they determine hes under the influence and they let him go??? wtf state was this in? clowns. they must of let him go if they say they convinced him to go to the hospital but he refused medical attention at the scene.

    IM CONFUSED WHY HE WASNT ARRESTED AT THE SCENE AND BROUGHT INTO THE JAIL? ALSO IF THAT HAPPENED THEY WOULD OF CHECKED HIM OUT AT THE JAIL OR HAD THE EMT COME TO THE JAIL...

    SOUNDS LIKE SOMETHING IS FISHY HERE. MAYBE EVERYONE INVOLVED SHOULD BE SUED EXCEPT THE VICTIM'S OF THE DUI GUY WHO DIED..
     
  5. Glenn129

    Glenn129

    Messages:
    5,011
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Location:
    Georgia
    This guy should have been arrested and put under the jailhouse. If he didn't want medical care it is not the fault of the police, it is the fault of the booze and his stupidity.
    I wonder if he had enough money to pay for the cars he ran into and the people's medical expense?
     
  6. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Messages:
    28,686
    Likes Received:
    25
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003
    How about getting a bit more information as to what exactly transpired before all this foreplay?

    'Drew
     
  7. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist Lifetime Member

    Messages:
    23,291
    Likes Received:
    15,993
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Since he agreed to go to the hospital they would not have arrested him at that time.

    For the simple reason that once he is under arrest the police dept\city is then liable for his medical bill.

    Also one thing the hospital is going to do is draw blood. which the police can then use against him in the pending DUI charge.
     
  8. ctfireman

    ctfireman

    Messages:
    3,577
    Likes Received:
    20
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Location:
    Bridgeport, CT
    He refused medical attention @ the scene (ambulance). He was arrested then later convinced to go to the hospital. Make sense?
     
  9. happy seal

    happy seal

    Messages:
    3,947
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Location:
    Connecticut
    dont get your panties in a frenzy.
    The po po have to take him to the hospital if he agreed to go. They didn't let him free, if he didnt agree to go to the hospital he would have sat in the cell till he died.
     
  10. BleedNOrange

    BleedNOrange Go Vols

    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Location:
    Volunteer State
    Nowhere in the article does it say he wasn't arrested. He may have just wanted to go directly to jail BUT the officer convinced him to go to the hospital.
     
  11. Bruce H

    Bruce H

    Messages:
    4,424
    Likes Received:
    1,481
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2000
    Location:
    missouri
    Does this sound like a drunken rant or what?
     
  12. beatcop

    beatcop

    Messages:
    2,204
    Likes Received:
    333
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    New England
    Just to spare any more posts like this:

    It appears that the accident was severe enough to injure all parties, as such serious injury accidents/fatal (DUI) are not a good time to administer field tests...the guy's lawyer will contend that the suspect was too injured to perform the field sobriety tests to standard.

    The Office of the Chief State Attorney has advised agencies not to arrest or issue an infraction at the scene. The case law behind this has to do with an accident where the suspect received a citation for a lesser charge (DUI, failure to drive right) and one of the other parties later died....the suspect's lawyer claimed double jeopardy when a manslaughter charge was later levied...after all the suspect was already charged for the incident. So, now you do a BAC warrant for the blood and go from there.

    Arresting injured suspects also stinks because they now need a "babysitter" to stay with them until they can be taken into custody....not a good use of manpower in a busy city.

    If someone is determined to be "gravely disabled" you can commit them to the hospital....I'm not going to take a refusal from someone with arterial bleeding, a serious mechanism of injury (fell out a 3rd story window) etc...it's not an issue, they're going.
     
  13. GG509

    GG509

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Location:
    Connecticut
    What I hate about on line news article is they cut out most of the information. The full news article in yesterday's Connecticut Post had more info. He was arrested and was taken to the police station. The police asked him several times if he wanted to go to the hospital during the booking process. The drunk driver refused each time he was asked. The police finally made him go when he started to sweat profusely. His wife is suing because she claims her husband was too intoxicated to be making medical decisions for himself.

    Now that there is more information, do you still think the cops are idiots? Oh wait, this is Glock Talk. The home of cop haters.
     
  14. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    Messages:
    28,686
    Likes Received:
    25
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2003

    There was enough information in the article I posted to infer that the police was not at fault.

    There are a total of 13 posts in this thread. Mine, and 12 responses. Of those 12, only one person (from MN) made any derogatory statements about the police, and virtually everyone else stepped in to correct him (her).

    Your statement in red is equally as questionable as the statement from the MN fellow - 11 responses to one anti-cop statement and you arrived at that conclusion how?


    'Drew
     
  15. Navy HMC

    Navy HMC

    Messages:
    1,144
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Location:
    Piped ashore
    Wasn't there, don't have all the facts. From the information given, PD did the correct actions. You can't make someone go against their will in most cases. Since there were other injured parties, EMS was on the scene and in all likelihood made a valiant attmept to take the patient to the hospital be he was more adamant about not going. The fact that the officers repeatedly and finally he went. Kudos to the officers for keeping on trying.

    Could they have taken him against his will? Yes. Police protective custody (at least here in KS) But that said, it takes a lot to do so and being inebriated is not in and of itself reason. If he knew who he was, where he was, when it was and what was going on, he is of a mind to make decisions for himself.

    Not a lawyer, but on the surface, the officers did all they could when they could. Play a stupid game, wn a stupid prize.