Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Dbltapglock, Jul 3, 2012.
It's already happening here; been happening for decades
Why is Hitler always portrayed as the only alternative to conservatism?
It's interesting that the destruction of the family unit has been the desire of every leftist, including Hitler.
Oh, come on -- he's hardly the only one. We can give you Mao, Fidel, Pol Pot, Stalin, Hugo Chavez...
Heck -- don't even get me started on that continent...
Tyranny always comes from the left. The far right is maximum liberty.
All great murderous tyrants in history have been leftists. That's why we stay so vigilant with you folks.
Hitler's party wasn't the "National Capitalist Party"
it was the "National Socialist Party'
Somebody needs to tell that to the GOP.
I never understood how people could call Hitler "right wing". He always seemed pretty "left wing" to me, you know, being a socialist and all.
I suspect it has been a huge (and largely successful) propaganda push by leftist academics, politicos, historians, etc., of portraying "leftists fighting for their motherland" (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc.) versus "a mad, racist, right-wing nut bent on global domination" (Hitler).
Hitler was a leftist.
He was very left wing, not quite as much as the communists that wanted to own industry, Hitler just wanted to control it completely. Both Hitler and Stalin were totalitarians though. Not all that far apart politically.
Cool chart, Doc -- a picture/diagram speaks a thousand words...
Correct. Hitler tainted their ideology.
One word: HATE.
Some Democrats were passing around basically the same theory when Bush was in office. Apparently, Hitler is the only alternative to liberalism also.