Yeah SW has a reputation for caving to the anti gun crowd. That's why you still see those stupid locks on new Sw revolvers.Smith and wesson
My Colt snakes are worth a lot of change so I like them a lot even though I am not big on snakes.Colt.... Never have liked anything named after snakes. Even cars or other stuff!
Dunno.... Never have. Even as a youngen. ?????![]()
Never been a Ruger fan except for their 10/22 rifle.Ruger (nothing to do with the Bill Ruger stuff people hold onto for some reason)
CZ, generally
And then the cheap brands like Rossi, Taurus, Hi-Point, Jennings, etc.
The moonie thing was off-putting, but mostly it's their polymer stuff I don't trust.Never cared for Kahr.
No doubt about it!Never felt compelled to own an HK, Sig or Beretta...even though they make some very nice weapons. Really, I'll consider any brand though if the product meets my needs. IMO label bashing is 99% internet BS and not personal experience.
H and K. Putting a rail on the pistols that only their brand light would fit is just pioneering! So just who was putting a Picatinny rail (or ANY light rail for that matter) on any handgun prior to H&K? That's right, NOBODY!!! Same goes for polymer frames with the VP70 beating Glock to the punch years before Gaston brought his pistol to market. Again, more pioneering development done by H&K. So HK sued other companies for patent infringement. Glock sues S&W over the Sigma, S&W, Colt and Remington were suing each other over single action revolvers over a hundred years ago, and the list goes on and on and on. It's all part of the game in business.H and K. Putting a rail on the pistols that only their brand light would fit is just arrogance. That and they sue many different companies and have an attitude that many of their products should not be owned by civilians. No thanks