close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

DHS paranoia may endanger First Responders

Discussion in 'Firefighter/EMS Talk' started by aspartz, Mar 6, 2005.

  1. aspartz

    aspartz

    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    133
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2000
    Location:
    Sandstone, MN 55072
    I just read this in the local paper. It amazes me that the feds would even consider keeping the FD/PD/EMS in the dark and in danger because of a paranoid over-reaction to 9-11

    Rail placards at center of dispute between safety and security

    http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthtribune/11065396.htm

    ARS
     
  2. Slinger646

    Slinger646 King of Sling

    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Location:
    In the Mountains of VA
    there is always the manifest which is kept in the locomotive or in the cab of a semi, if that isnt there and i cant make out whats inside, i'm waiting for the glow-worms
     

  3. TerraMedicX

    TerraMedicX

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Location:
    Boulder, CO
    True....but getting close enough to get the manifest breaks my number one rule about HAZMAT, the wonderful "Rule of Thumb!"

    Nate.
     
  4. obxprnstar

    obxprnstar Goth Lover

    Messages:
    1,013
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Zombie Patrol
    Ditto that for me. Plus if they do trains, who is to say that truck will not be shortly afterwards.
     
  5. KY Moose

    KY Moose

    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    518
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2001
    Location:
    Republic of Northern Virginia
    Coming from DHS, it doesn't surprise me. IMHO, it's a bad idea.

    Hell, DHS did a fine job of throwing away millions of dollars to small town departments to buy equipment for responding to terrorist incidents, when those departments don't have the manpower or training to respond to that type of incident.
     
  6. Tvov

    Tvov

    Messages:
    5,660
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2000
    Location:
    CT,USA
    I have to agree with you on this. Guys in my department are working on, and have been, getting some of that money for HazMat gear way beyond basic equipment. This is silly considering the basically zero odds we would ever need it, and that our SOPs for anything beyond a minor HazMat is to back off, secure the area, and wait for the boys from the state.

    Most of these guys have the attitude of- "It's not 'our' money!" (yes it is, ever heard of taxes??), and "If we don't get it and spend it, someone else will!" (that doesn't make it right).

    I am really beginning to sound like an "evil old timer" in my department.
     
  7. Tvov

    Tvov

    Messages:
    5,660
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2000
    Location:
    CT,USA
    Anyway, are terrorists really going to read the placards anyway??
     
  8. aspartz

    aspartz

    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    133
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2000
    Location:
    Sandstone, MN 55072
    The terrorist are more likely to have a copy of the manifests. The odds of them needing the placards to select a target is about zero.

    InRE DHS grant money -- When I took my HazMAt ops class, it was funded by DHS, so it was supposed to be targeted to bio-terrorism rather than a random accident. Exactly what are the odds of the former out here in the boonies?

    ARS
     
  9. Rob72

    Rob72

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Location:
    OKC, OK
    To my mind, removing the placards would assist any "Terr-***" action. Transport of hazmat is largely common sense/public domain, you're only hiding info from the people that need it. Removing the placards increases the liklihood of getting first responders in closer to a good secondary explosive, which in turn will occupy more resources recovering/evacuating the FR's.

    Think it through: set off a "good'un" that will call out half a dozen engines, PD's East/West/North/South whatever side patrol units, and three or so medic units. Either with shooters, or an equally impressive secondary IED, get a significant portion of the responders, then go for one (or a couple) of the good high-visibility, soft-targets, like a school, ball stadium, etc.. No big challenge for 12 informed, dedicated individuals.....:soap:
     
  10. DaleGribble

    DaleGribble Sandwich!

    Messages:
    7,489
    Likes Received:
    875
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Land of the toothless!
    I used to feel the same but now I have to disagree.

    Remember the HAZMAT incident in Graniteville SC where nine people died and over 200 were hospitalized? Well I was working that night and I was there due to a mutual aid agreement. When our small EMS agency got a huge portable decon shelter last year I thought it was a big waste, not anymore. I recently got my tyvex suit and all the goodies (after the incident). When I signed up for the suit I thought it to was a waste, now I'm glad I have it!

    Just because an agency might be small and in a low threat area does not mean they are immune.
     
  11. KY Moose

    KY Moose

    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    518
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2001
    Location:
    Republic of Northern Virginia

    I'm not saying everyplace is immune to an attack, just that the money is not being spent wisely or going to locations where the threat is greater like those places that have been/or have planned to be attacked.

    Say a small agency gets money from DHS to purchases HAZMAT equipment for domestic preparedness that their normal budget would not allow them to have and they spend over thirty thousand dollars on the stuff. What happens when the shelf life expires on some of the supplies? If they barley get by on their normal budget, who is going to replace the equipment or pay for the special initial/continuing training for CBRN or other terrorist related incidents?

    If some places in small town America can barley muster enough people to respond to fire and/or EMS calls during the daytime, how are they going to handle a terrorist incident? Since the federal government is not going to give this money to the greater risk areas, then MHO is that since Congress had to treat this as pork and get their states and districts a cut of the money, then each states should be required to set up special response task forces to respond within their states in order to get cash.