close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

CZ-75 or BHP?

Discussion in 'CZ Club' started by JK-linux, Apr 11, 2010.

  1. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  2. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,223
    Likes Received:
    6,037
    Location:
    PA
    I have both and both are outstanding 9mms.

    My CZ is the standard DA/SA, not the SAO version.
     

  3. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  4. seamaster

    seamaster

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    785
    Both are solid guns and imo just about equal but I have experienced some ftf with a new HP. The two older HP's I've shot have been perfect as is was every CZ75 that I shot. My newer CZ P-01 has also been flawless and ffeds any wide mouth hollow point ammo I can find.

    I would choose the CZ over a Portugal assembled HP.

    Can you shoot both before choosing?

    Seamaster
     
  5. cruz lee

    cruz lee

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    Rio Grande Valley
    CZ fan here...75BD amd 40b...:wavey:
     
  6. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  7. seamaster

    seamaster

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    785
    Perhaps call CZ customer service and ask about parts availability for the older CZ75.
     
  8. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  9. the perfesser

    the perfesser

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    0
    Own both. My 75B with standard safety (not decocker) was my first full-sized 9mm. I liked it so much that I had to get a somewhat similar Mk. III HP, and then other CZs and a "classic" HP.

    If the choice were between a 75B and a Mk. III HP, I would get both, the former first to take care of my defense/sport needs, and then the latter when I had the money.

    But you favor a pre-B, so my comparison does not fit your parameters. I have never had the urge to own a pre-B. I mean no offense: Is there a practical -- not aesthetic or sentimental or collecting reason -- for this?
     
  10. mitchg233

    mitchg233

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the hp is slightly slimmer, and a little better for small hands.
     
  11. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  12. Cambo

    Cambo

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    2,546
    Location:
    New Jersey
    I have a CZ 75(used to have a SA one as well) and had a Hi Power. Both are great guns, but I like the CZ grip, trigger, sights, safety, balance much better.
     
  13. dober-man

    dober-man

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    4
    i have a bhp,and both cz's sao & dao.the cz's are great guns. i like the single action a little better.all three are great guns.i have yet to see a cz 75b have ftf.i cant say that about any other make that i own or have owned.
     
  14. stopatrain

    stopatrain Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
  15. JK-linux

    JK-linux

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,799
    Likes Received:
    243
    .....
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  16. magpie maniac

    magpie maniac

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Congratulations on the Hi-Power. I own two BHP Standards (a 1969 and a 2009) and absolutely love them. My newer one actually is in my daily carry rotation.

    Back when I was shopping for a non-polymer 9mm, it came down between the CZ and the BHP. I went with the Hi-Power because of feel, parts availability, reliability, and nostalgia. I'll eventually add a CZ to my collection, but owning a BHP is a rite of passage. A must for any self-respecting gunowner. :)
     
  17. big68

    big68

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Missouri
    You poor thing. Enjoy that BHP and let us know how she does. Congrats and I am sure a CZ will be in your future.
     
  18. SDDL-UP

    SDDL-UP

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    544
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Idaho
    I own both and I'd take the CZ first. Better ergonomics, DA/SA, higher capacity.

    Just one note of caution about NEW CZ's, they are suffering from quality control issues as of late. I've had THREE different CZ's have the slide serrations also machined into the slide rails - not good. Because of this I will not purchase any more CZ's without a personal inspection. The old pre-B serrations were concave and I don't think there was any way this type of flaw could have happened.
     
  19. mitchg233

    mitchg233

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think having the option to DA is underrated. For that reason I would prefer the CZ.
     
  20. Bret

    Bret Crimping Master

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    475
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    North Georgia
    I own several of each and think your question really should have been which one to purchase first. Overall, the cosmetic quality of the Browning or FN Hi Powers is better than the CZ's. Both are reliable without getting a gunsmith involved. The CZ's feel slightly better in my hand, but the HP is good too. Two of my CZ's came from the factory with recoil springs that were too weak, so they might have to be replaced. The HP recoil springs were just fine. The CZ sight white dots are way to small. The stock HP trigger is awful. Plan on removing the magazine disconnect if you want to make it the way it should be. Plan on using a CZ in SA mode. Manually decocking a CZ so you can carry it in DA mode but can't use the manual safety doesn't seem too safe to me. The CZ's are heavy for concealed carry. I really wish they made a SA CZ75 Compact with an aluminum frame. I'd buy one in a second. I could go on, but the bottom line is that both are good pistols. Get one of each when your budget permits.