close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Carbon vs. Stainless

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by 20South, Jan 25, 2011.

  1. 20South

    20South

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    East of CBUS
    I do not think this is a repost, but I found it on one of those "other" sites and thought it was very interesting. I have always heard different things about the pitfalls of stainless in a 1911, much of it to do with galling, hardness, tight fits, accuracy, etc... I still am not sure there is a definitive answer about "best", but this sheds some light on at least one manufacturers steel standards:

    posted by Wilson Combat Rep:

    Here are the current specs. These are subject to materials availability, but this is current. Maybe a moderator can make it a sticky?


    Carbon Frame 4140 Carbon forging 26-30 RC
    Carbon Slides 4340 Carbon forging 38-42 RC

    Stainless Frame 400 Series forging 26-30 RC
    Stainless Slide 400 Series forging 38-42 RC

    Stainless Barrels 416R (rifle barrel grade) forging, 40-42 RC

    Aluminum frames-7075 T6 forgings, mil-spec hard anodized.

    So, as you can see-the hardnesses for stainless and chromemoly (carbon) are the same. Stainless doesn't machine as cleanly, so there is more fitting required. If you fit it too tightly or improperly, it can gall.

    http://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=300386

    I guess I will just have to pick up one of those stainless models and put it through its paces to be sure :dunno:
     
  2. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,774
    Likes Received:
    6,578
    Location:
    PA
    I'm not huge fan of stainless for the 1911.

    Virtually all my high end models are carbon.
     

  3. AZ Husker

    AZ Husker

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Location:
    Phoenix
    For my shooing/carry guns I am a fan. Since they've worked out the metallurgy to prevent galling, I've had not one problem with any of my stainless pistols in the last ten years. The extra rust prevention is a great help here in AZ where I sweat like crazy in the summers. It's a nice extra to be able to strip your gun and spend 15 minutes in a bead blasting cabinet and have it come out looking brand new.
     
  4. 20South

    20South

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    East of CBUS
    That was kind of what I read into the WCR post. I can understand the comment that they are harder to fit and that could be why there are some negative perceptions about SS - ie manufacturers putting ill fit 1911s into the marketplace. Good to hear you have had so much success with them!
     
  5. Jim S.

    Jim S.

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Northwest Indiana
    The quality of stainless steel for use in guns has improved tremendously since the days of galling and hardness issues.
    I think they are perfectly reliable and durable these days.
    I would not worry about getting a stainless gun as long as it is fairly new.
     
  6. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,774
    Likes Received:
    6,578
    Location:
    PA
    Stainless is much improved, but I still prefer carbon.
     
  7. PlasticGuy

    PlasticGuy

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2000
    Messages:
    5,165
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have never had a problem with either. Carbon can be fitted a bit tighter and might be slightly more durable, but the difference is minor and stainless is obviously more corrosion resistant. I'm far more concerned about the quality of the 1911 than whether it's carbon or stainless.
     
  8. Rinspeed

    Rinspeed JAFO

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2001
    Messages:
    10,954
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Location:
    NY
    The very only thing SS has going for it is the resistance to corrosion. For most high stress parts it's a poor choice compared to carbon steel. The problem with SS is not the material itself it's what's added to it to make it machinable which is sulfur. The better quality barrels use 416R SS which is lower in sulfur content but more expensive and harder on tooling.
     
  9. FLIPPER 348

    FLIPPER 348 Bigfoot enthusiast enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    25,008
    Likes Received:
    6,245
    Location:
    Bend Oregon
    Carbon Steel & Wood make for the best 1911s
     
  10. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,774
    Likes Received:
    6,578
    Location:
    PA
    For once, we agree, FLIPPER. :supergrin:
     
  11. AZ Husker

    AZ Husker

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Location:
    Phoenix
    I know you have an impressive collection Bac, but what do you carry daily?
     
  12. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,991
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    A Kimber CDP II
     
  13. Nestor

    Nestor Lean & Mean

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    12,852
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    Location:
    Canada
    I love carbon, but I can see stainless only in my future.
    I'm going to stay in Alberta for good (just bought a house) and the weather here can be brutal and I mean it.
    For practical reason and against my preferences I'm going to stick with stainless.
     
  14. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,774
    Likes Received:
    6,578
    Location:
    PA
    It is more corrosion resistant.
     
  15. FLIPPER 348

    FLIPPER 348 Bigfoot enthusiast enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    25,008
    Likes Received:
    6,245
    Location:
    Bend Oregon
    Well I did put some new vintage GI black plastic grips on my aluminum Fusion .22 build because the wood grips just did not 'feel' right on it. Wood was made for steel I guess.
     
  16. Hokie1911

    Hokie1911 >

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Carried the EGW at all?
     
  17. BGPD

    BGPD

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Serving small town America
    While I like the aesthetic appeal of carbon and wood, my duty 1911s are stainless. My off duty ones are blued. When I am on duty, the open belt gun gets exposed to all the elements and scratches from hits/fights. Easily polished out and as said before, stainless is more corrosion resistant.
     
  18. Nestor

    Nestor Lean & Mean

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    12,852
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    Location:
    Canada
    Agree.
    For this reason I bought S&W model 64 (instead of model 10) lately.
    If You want to do shooting all year long here, having stainless won't hurt (maybe except my feelings).
    However I may buy BHP soon and this won't be stainless gun, but hell...I want one anyway :cool:
     
  19. FM12

    FM12 I need AMMO!

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Alabama
    Either. My favorite 1911, the smith & wesson, is stainless. Love it!!!!
     
  20. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    107,774
    Likes Received:
    6,578
    Location:
    PA
    No Paul.

    I need to get it to the range and put some more rounds through it. It is an awesome shooting gun though. I'm just so used to my Kimber.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011