close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Blue Label G43 pricing?

Discussion in 'Cop Talk' started by FiremanMike, Mar 18, 2015.

  1. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    4,140
    Likes Received:
    660
    Location:
    The interwebs
  2. rotorwind

    rotorwind

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    486
    Location:
    AZ
    I heard $350 on another thread. Not sure if that's accurate. Hope so.
     

  3. Vigilant

    Vigilant

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Inside the Perimeter
  4. COBRA90GT

    COBRA90GT

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
    G42 was ~ $320ish so I'd expect the G43 to be priced close to that, hopefully less than the standard $398 (for blue label). Stay tuned for official pricing in the meantime...

    YMMV
     
  5. BlackPaladin

    BlackPaladin

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Also wondering here.

    If someone that works day shift can check with Atlantic Tactical in the morning, my guess is they might have some idea, as they are one of the larger blue label distributers.
     
  6. chip1wa

    chip1wa

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    1
  7. LongRifle75

    LongRifle75

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Im signing on. Id like to know this as well...............
     
  8. GD2J

    GD2J GoDirectly2Jail

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,604
    Likes Received:
    508
    Location:
    The Old Dominion
    A while back I picked up a Kahr PM9 though their firearms instructor purchase program, and while it's a great little gun I prefer a Glock trigger.

    I might just give this a whirl if the price indeed turns out to be right.
     
  9. ChrisJn

    ChrisJn "Old Bill"

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,943
    Likes Received:
    201
    Location:
    Baldwin Co, Alabama
    $358 Blue label
     
  10. nikerret

    nikerret Mr. Awesome

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,565
    Likes Received:
    319
    Location:
    Kansas
    Finally, I get one right, again. I said they would release this after they sold a bunch of the G42's. I'll have one, at least to try it out.
     
  11. Vigilant

    Vigilant

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Inside the Perimeter
    Quick and dirty comparison, PM9 vs. G43. Both have polygonal rifling. CM9 has standard rifling, and typically sells for a bit less that the stated Blue Label price for the G43. PM9 is a bit pricey. The only advantage of the G43 that I can see from my perspective is the Glock trigger. Is that worth the extra length, width, height and weight? To some perhaps, but not to me.


    Kahr PM9 G43

    Barrel Length: 3.1 3.39
    Overall Length: 5.3 6.26
    Height: 4.0 4.25
    Width: .90 1.02
    Weight no mag: 14.0 16.19
    Empty mag wt.: 1.9 1.76

    Edit: The cut and paste did not work quite right, but you can still see the comparison.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2015
  12. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    46,951
    Likes Received:
    17,880
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Which is what we've been asking for, for years.

    I don't understand the comment.:dunno:

    What did anybody think a Glock single-stack 9mm would be? Certainly not a single-stack version of a bigger model, which would defeat the whole purpose of making it slimmer.

    We weren't asking for a single stack Glock to be smaller than a PM9, we were asking for a version of the PM9 that was not made by Kahr.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2015
  13. Vigilant

    Vigilant

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Inside the Perimeter
    My point is that the only real benefit that I can see it offers over a PM9 or CM9 is the Glock trigger. 3/10 of an inch more barrel length should not make much of a difference in velocity. So the choice appears to be compact size and an unfamiliar trigger versus more size and weight for a Glock trigger.
     
  14. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    4,140
    Likes Received:
    660
    Location:
    The interwebs
    I owned a pm9 for awhile, I was ok, but I didn't like what I perceived as being a high bore axis and I really hated that it was damn near impossible to strip the upper and clean the firing pin/channel. I followed all the instructions to a T and never got that thing apart.
     
  15. Vigilant

    Vigilant

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Inside the Perimeter
    Practice makes perfect on field stripping a PM9. It still takes me some time. This is the smallest handgun I own, and it fills a niche.

    Although there are some other minor differences in dimensions, one thing to consider is the fact that the specs show a difference in width of the G43 vs. the G26 of 1.02 inches vs. 1.18. That comes out to .16 inch more width for the G26 with height and overall length being close to the same either way. As most of us know, there are a lot of benefits to be had with the G26 or its .40 and .357 Sig counterparts, for only .16 inch more width.
     
  16. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    4,140
    Likes Received:
    660
    Location:
    The interwebs
    Yeah, I'm not 100% on this gun tbh. I think I might wait until I can hold it first..
     
  17. mntrpr

    mntrpr

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I just ordered one and paid 358 + tax.
     
  18. wprebeck

    wprebeck Got quacks?

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,261
    Likes Received:
    3,572
    Location:
    Mm..looks like heaven
    Well, it's got one thing going for it, that Kahr doesn't:

    It's not a Kahr. Or a Kel-tec. Or any other lower tiered handgun. It's a Glock, with all the quality the name implies.

    Yes, I'm a snob - I admit it. The "cheapest" guns I have are a pair of Taurus revolvers that have less than one hundred rounds through either of them. I have a 44SS6 that I deer hunt with, and it might get shot two-three times per year. The other is a Tracker .357 that I rarely shoot. Last time it went "bang" was nearly five years ago. I used it for deer hunting, since I had a broken wrist, and couldn't use the other revolver. Dropped a buck at 30 yards, with an offhand unsupported shot.

    They work fine, for what I need. For carry guns, I prefer something with a bit more of established quality behind it. Before being hired at my agency, I carried a Colt Officer's Model (Lightweight). I now carry a Gen4 G17 daily. When I retire, I'll probably stick with my Glocks, as I've gotten quite accustomed to them over the years. I've been a Glock armorer for about a dozen of those years, and own six Glocks at the moment. Not a lot, but all I "need" right now.

    Thought about a 42, but I'm not a .380 fan. More power to those who are, though. Just pick a good gun!
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2015
  19. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    4,140
    Likes Received:
    660
    Location:
    The interwebs
    They give you an ETA?
     
  20. Vigilant

    Vigilant

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,582
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Inside the Perimeter
    No offense taken, but I would not consider Kahr to be a 'lower tiered handgun'. As I said, the PM9 fills a niche for me, when I need something compact and light. The vast majority of the time, I pocket carry an M&P 9C. To each their own.