I thought the gun controllers always say we're not out to take your guns??? https://www.mediaite.com/election-2...yes-were-going-to-take-your-ar-15-your-ak-47/ You guys have to read this article. His ignorance of the topic is nothing short of stunning. If he thinks a 5.56 will tear someone up I wonder what he thinks most 30 caliber and larger hunting rounds would do. When have any of you guys heard anyone who knows guns speak of a round as "high impact"? Then of course there's his quote about people who have paid likely close to $1,000 for AR-15s who want to chop them up and don't need them because their weapons of war (paraphrasing). I would love to know what percentage of AR-15 owners have all the sudden come to the conclusion that these are evil weapons of war and they want to destroy their own property. Which army issues AR-15s? It would be utterly impossible for me to express how sick I am of hearing what is and is not useful for hunting. Every single pro-gun person at every single opportunity simply must push back on this absurd concept that the second amendment has anything whatsoever to do with hunting. Ugh.