Joined
·
14,332 Posts
Assuming the details of the incident presented in the AAR are accurate and true - there should be criminal charges and civil liability attached for the decisions made by so-called "leadership".
I've had riot control training both in the academy and a limited amount while as a member of SORT before moving to my new spot, so I have a little background on how **** should be done. Baltimore didn't do it right, and that's a major understatement. Forcing officers into a riot scene without gear, and mandating that they are even allowed to wear a helmet, as they were being assaulted by rocks and other flying debris is simply inexcusable and demands criminal charges for those who made that decision. Further, civil litigation should follow - I see no reason to allow "commanders" to needlessly endanger the lives of police officers - and to not pay a steep price for doing so.
These decisons should come with a dear price. The leadership - or lack thereof - caused countless injuries to those who signed up to protect their community. If I act outside of established law (both statutory and case), policy, and fail the "reasonable person" litmus test long since established by the USSC in most cases that involve use-of-force - I will be held responsible. Said responsibility will include much more than the loss of my employment...and we all know it. Those responsible for this debacle should be held to the same standard.
I've got class to go to, and will reply more later, but I'll leave you guys with this: I'll be damned, if I will stand there and willingly allow myself to be hit with rocks and not defend myself and my fellow officers. It'd either be time to go home, or to sack up and do what we gotta do, employment worries taking a back seat.
**** that noise.
I've had riot control training both in the academy and a limited amount while as a member of SORT before moving to my new spot, so I have a little background on how **** should be done. Baltimore didn't do it right, and that's a major understatement. Forcing officers into a riot scene without gear, and mandating that they are even allowed to wear a helmet, as they were being assaulted by rocks and other flying debris is simply inexcusable and demands criminal charges for those who made that decision. Further, civil litigation should follow - I see no reason to allow "commanders" to needlessly endanger the lives of police officers - and to not pay a steep price for doing so.
These decisons should come with a dear price. The leadership - or lack thereof - caused countless injuries to those who signed up to protect their community. If I act outside of established law (both statutory and case), policy, and fail the "reasonable person" litmus test long since established by the USSC in most cases that involve use-of-force - I will be held responsible. Said responsibility will include much more than the loss of my employment...and we all know it. Those responsible for this debacle should be held to the same standard.
I've got class to go to, and will reply more later, but I'll leave you guys with this: I'll be damned, if I will stand there and willingly allow myself to be hit with rocks and not defend myself and my fellow officers. It'd either be time to go home, or to sack up and do what we gotta do, employment worries taking a back seat.
**** that noise.