Joined
·
75,663 Posts
Yes. There is no definitive answer to that question, so it is often hotly debated in the Army.Is a Ranger someone in a Ranger Bn, or someone who completed Ranger school or either?
As in, "I am/was an Army Ranger"
Yes. There is no definitive answer to that question, so it is often hotly debated in the Army.Is a Ranger someone in a Ranger Bn, or someone who completed Ranger school or either?
As in, "I am/was an Army Ranger"
So then as far as the other guy is concerned yea, he's straight up a Ranger. Certainly when it comes to libel claims against saying otherwise....He earned his tab and deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan with the 101st as an Infantry Officer.... The guy he is running against is claiming Jake isn't really a Ranger. That guy also never served......
Depends on your perspective… typically the thought is that ranger school makes you “ranger qualified”, but you aren’t a “ranger” (in an active sense) unless you are at a ranger regiment and were selected through rasp. There are a lot of fat nasty **** bags with ranger tabs because they went to “ranger school”. Don’t get me wrong I like the idea of ranger school, but it’s different.Is a Ranger someone in a Ranger Bn, or someone who completed Ranger school or either?
As in, "I am/was an Army Ranger"
If he was tabbed then he can call himself a Ranger. He was Ranger qualified even though not in Ranger BattTo clarify, some guy, Jake something, is running for office in Arkansas. He earned his tab and deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan with the 101st as an Infantry Officer. The guy he is running against is claiming Jake isn't really a Ranger. That guy also never served. From my limited knowledge, anyone who completes Ranger school is to be admired.
That's an opinion universally shared by people who have been in the Ranger regiment. I agree with you in principle, but the Army officially puts an ASI for Ranger on your MOS when you graduate from Ranger School - they don't put crap on there when you are assigned to a Ranger battalion.Depends on your perspective… typically the thought is that ranger school makes you “ranger qualified”, but you aren’t a “ranger” (in an active sense) unless you are at a ranger regiment and were selected through rasp. There are a lot of fat nasty **** bags with ranger tabs because they went to “ranger school”. Don’t get me wrong I like the idea of ranger school, but it’s different.
Well. If someone was in Ranger batt, maybe they could.Let me rephrase the question to this specific scenario. A guy, running for office, who completed Ranger school and was an Infantry officer with the 101st during a combat deployment. His campaign says he was an Army Ranger. How much, if at all, are you going to bust his balls?
Ok, difference being what?That would be like me going to Airborne School and claiming I was in the 82nd Airborne... Alot of soldiers go to Ranger School, but that does not make them a ranger.
I’d save my breathe…Let me rephrase the question to this specific scenario. A guy, running for office, who completed Ranger school and was an Infantry officer with the 101st during a combat deployment. His campaign says he was an Army Ranger. How much, if at all, are you going to bust his balls?