close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Application for ND oil refinery approved, would be first built in US in 30

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by G17Jake, Oct 10, 2012.

  1. G17Jake

    G17Jake

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    723
    First built in 30 years. I hope it doesn't hit a roadblock.
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  2. Indianashooter

    Indianashooter

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Indiana
    With Barry in office, one never knows how this will turn out.
     

  3. Angry Fist

    Angry Fist Dehumanizer® Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    40,227
    Likes Received:
    10,106
    Location:
    Hellbilly Hill
    Now lets get some new nuke plants online, too! Investing in infrastructure is a great way to create jobs.
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  4. pesticidal

    pesticidal Eh? CLM

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2002
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    North Dakota
  5. frank4570

    frank4570

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,508
    Likes Received:
    8
    Good. We need more refineries and more wells. We are our own worst enemies in this topic.
     
  6. Naelbis

    Naelbis

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    229
    Location:
    ND
    If she came out and said anything but that she would never have a prayer...the oil boom is too important to the state economy. Now this particular refinery project has some help in the fact that it is partially funded by and located on one of the reservations. So they have the whole minority thing going although most of the jobs created will end up going to non-tribal members out of necessity.
     
  7. G17Jake

    G17Jake

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    723
    I was wondering if that helped get the application approved.
     
  8. clint curtis

    clint curtis

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Good, they can put it on the U.S. market instead of piping it to Houston and shipping it abroad.
    Screw W's buddies.
     
  9. ray9898

    ray9898

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Messages:
    14,755
    Likes Received:
    2,289
    Location:
    Georgia
    Dosen't matter.....we will still buy it at the market price. 'Drill here' does nothing to help the prices we pay, there is no discount.
     
  10. Angry Fist

    Angry Fist Dehumanizer® Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    40,227
    Likes Received:
    10,106
    Location:
    Hellbilly Hill
    Otherwise, the price wouldn't be so damn high in Alaska.
     
  11. Bruce H

    Bruce H

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2000
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    763
    Location:
    missouri
    Now the sierra club and every other tree hugger bunch will head to court. Maybe in another thirty years.
     
  12. camelotkid

    camelotkid non-believer

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,937
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Oak Ridge, TN
    sadly most people don't understand that
     
  13. sourdough44

    sourdough44

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    488
    Location:
    WI
    Yes, I'm sure the fact that it is on 'reservation' land was a large factor in approval. I wonder how the production taxes will play out, compared to a refinery not on res land & not owned by 'Native Americans'.

    Just saying, the way it goes around here is they make millions with tax advantaged casinos & then give pennies on the dollar to the local community as a goodwill gesture. They also sided with the lefties to come out against the wolf hunt in WI.
     
  14. HexHead

    HexHead

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    4,815
    Likes Received:
    1
    I guess the Indians figure it will be even more profitable than a casino?
     
  15. sourdough44

    sourdough44

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    488
    Location:
    WI
    Yes, it's a lot easier to make $$ if your tax & regulation liability is drastically lower than the competition. Look at the smoking laws, the Indian properties choose to pass on that law. The smokers have flocked to the smoker friendly casinos. No I don't smoke & never had, many say fine.

    It's also easier to sell fuel when your taxes are much lower. On top of that, I'd expect Gov't $$ kicked in to encourage development on reservation property. The left is always squawking about 'corporate welfare' to big oil. You can also expect a streamlined permitting process compared to off res property. What's the status of that AZ refinery that's supposidly in the works?
     
  16. Dennis in MA

    Dennis in MA Get off my lawn

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2001
    Messages:
    42,700
    Likes Received:
    2,815
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    Why????

    First oil refinery in 30 years.

    Now stop and think about that.










    In the last 30 years, our gasoline consumption has not increased to require another refinery IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY!

    30 years ago, gasoline was $1 a gallon and we thought it was expensive. It's risen faster than inflation over that period (forget that it was $1 back in the late 90's) yet our consumption has not risen dramatically.

    We don't need a whole lot more refineries. We don't need more wells. We need more truth.

    Truth is: We have lots of oil.

    Truth is: We are nowhere NEAR peak oil.

    Truth is: We should run the Arabian fields DRY before tapping our own. (Why use ours now - they have more and are friendly to us.)

    Truth is: Oil should be about $40/bbl and gasoline at $1.75. And none of that has to do with increasing production or refining.
     
  17. mixflip

    mixflip

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,825
    Likes Received:
    4
    We have had the exact same number of refineries in the US since the 70's yet the number of cars, planes and trains used in the US has steadily increased.

    Its obvious we need more refineries.

    The refinery I worked at was built in 1901 and was pegged at max production every year I was there.
     
  18. harlenm

    harlenm Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 1999
    Messages:
    9,611
    Likes Received:
    562
    Location:
    CT
    More supply=lower prices.
     
  19. Z71bill

    Z71bill

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    16,538
    Likes Received:
    3,788
    Location:
    Texas
    Then explain why WTI is $20 less a barrel that Brent?

    Isn't $20 (~18%) less a discount?

    While you are at it - explain why natural gas is so much cheaper in the USA VS the rest of the world?

    Both are market prices - which would you rather buy at?

    IMHO the increase production & lower usage IN THE USA has lowered the price of WTI (VS Brent).

    But why would anyone need proof that increasing supply and reducing demand lowers the price? :dunno:
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2012
  20. Z71bill

    Z71bill

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    16,538
    Likes Received:
    3,788
    Location:
    Texas
    BTW - just because no new refineries have been built - the capacity of some existing refineries has increased DRAMATICALLY in the last 30 years.

    It is much easier - from a regulatory & cost justification stand point - to increase existing facilities VS build new from scratch.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2012