Joined
·
3,352 Posts
The chief was one of the first on scene. IIRC 2 Uvalde officers received grazing wounds, after they arrived on scene. They claimed they didn't know where the gunfire was coming from and retreated.
The chief may have been the first officer that made it into the school to the outside of rooms 111 and 112.
He claims he wasn't in charge. He didn't have any radios, or body armor.
BUT HE WAS DIRECTING WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THAT HALLWAY.
Asking for keys, shields, breaching tools, and perhaps directing other officers to evacuate the rest of the school. But he claims he wasn't in charge.
A DPS Agent (not sure what that means) flat out told the group in the hallway, if there were injured in with the suspect, THEY NEEDED TO MAKE ENTRY.
The chief who wasn't in charge, said the walls were paper thin, and they needed to evacuate the surrounding classrooms, to "save" those students.
Breaching tools, ballistic shields, and keys were in that hallway within minutes, but the chief, who wasn't in charge, still kept the other officers from going in.
One of those classroom doors had a lock that wasn't working, so it wasn't keeping the door shut. Per Col McCraw, the lock itself was working, but the strike plate in doorframe was misaligned, so the door wouldn't lock shut.
Arguing about ICS, when the guy in charge, who doesn't have a radio, he had a cellphone, is making tactical decisions, and scene management decisions, he attempted to negotiate with the shooter, but he also claims he wasn't the incident commander, is pointless.
He wasn't following active shooter protocols, or ICS protocols.
But he doesn't seem to understand how bad this response was.
It's like once there was a closed door between LE and the shooter it became a barricaded suspect call, in the chief's mind. Or, the chief was completely unable to take a course of action, engage an active shooter, that would result in ANY death caused be LE, even if it was the active shooter that died.
The chief may have been the first officer that made it into the school to the outside of rooms 111 and 112.
He claims he wasn't in charge. He didn't have any radios, or body armor.
BUT HE WAS DIRECTING WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THAT HALLWAY.
Asking for keys, shields, breaching tools, and perhaps directing other officers to evacuate the rest of the school. But he claims he wasn't in charge.
A DPS Agent (not sure what that means) flat out told the group in the hallway, if there were injured in with the suspect, THEY NEEDED TO MAKE ENTRY.
The chief who wasn't in charge, said the walls were paper thin, and they needed to evacuate the surrounding classrooms, to "save" those students.
Breaching tools, ballistic shields, and keys were in that hallway within minutes, but the chief, who wasn't in charge, still kept the other officers from going in.
One of those classroom doors had a lock that wasn't working, so it wasn't keeping the door shut. Per Col McCraw, the lock itself was working, but the strike plate in doorframe was misaligned, so the door wouldn't lock shut.
Arguing about ICS, when the guy in charge, who doesn't have a radio, he had a cellphone, is making tactical decisions, and scene management decisions, he attempted to negotiate with the shooter, but he also claims he wasn't the incident commander, is pointless.
He wasn't following active shooter protocols, or ICS protocols.
But he doesn't seem to understand how bad this response was.
It's like once there was a closed door between LE and the shooter it became a barricaded suspect call, in the chief's mind. Or, the chief was completely unable to take a course of action, engage an active shooter, that would result in ANY death caused be LE, even if it was the active shooter that died.