close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

AN ARMY OUTGUNNED Physics Demands A New Basic Combat Weapon

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Anglin_AZ, Jan 4, 2013.

  1. Anglin_AZ

    Anglin_AZ

    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
  2. TactiCool

    TactiCool

    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Location:
    Southeast LA.
    This article reminds me of that old .280 intermediate round the Brits developed in the late '40's. 'Murica wasn't interested at the time.
     

  3. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick AAAMAD

    Messages:
    20,681
    Likes Received:
    5,351
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Location:
    Wherever they pay me to park
    Not going to happen
     
  4. Harper

    Harper

    Messages:
    2,610
    Likes Received:
    15
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Why not? It sounds like a good cartridge. It'd be decent for deer hunting too.
     
  5. NIB

    NIB

    Messages:
    2,192
    Likes Received:
    560
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Location:
    Lost Angeles
    Any caliber change would have to encompass all of NATO no matter how much anyone thinks NATO is outdated. Whatever anyone thinks of NATO, we still have many friendly nations under it. Just because it works fine in the AR platform doesn't mean it will work in the various other NATO rifles. The SA-80 comes to mind which took years as well as for H&K to uncluster pluck it. Plus the budget will no longer be there for any new caliber, rifle, or sidearm for years to come.
     
  6. Ragnar

    Ragnar

    Messages:
    6,539
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Location:
    Sometimes here, sometimes there
    Correct. We are so married to the AR and its 5.56mm round that we can't just drop it.

    General MacArthur had the same issue when the M1 Garand was being developed. The rifle was designed for a new .276 cartridge but there were vast stocks of .30-06 ammunition sitting around and he ordered the Garand to be made in .30 cal.
     
  7. mrmedina

    mrmedina NRA Member

    Messages:
    5,028
    Likes Received:
    4,009
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004
    Location:
    Albuquerque,NM
    Military has talking this game for ten years+. I just believe that the old (DOD)guard won't allow anything but M-16s. But the new thinking is a different weapon and caliber.

    Remember the US Army only allowed Springfield Trap-door single shot rifles. But Sitting Bull and friends showed that was a mistake.
     
  8. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Messages:
    47,220
    Likes Received:
    18,538
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    An Army Outgunned? That will come as news to the Army. A gun guy or two in the Army want a cooler new gun. That's about all.

    If they want to change the tactics and marksmanship training to go along, then they might be headed somewhere.
     
  9. m2hmghb

    m2hmghb

    Messages:
    8,695
    Likes Received:
    89
    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Location:
    Livin in the country of NJ
    The M1 Garand was in .276 Pedersen and held 10 rounds, Douglas MacArthur ordered it redesigned in 30-06 to simplify logistics as well as make use of available war stocks and manufacturing capabilities. The same holds true of the 5.56. With the advent of OTM bullets being approved by JAG there is a decent round available for longer ranges. The Army will never wholly switch to a new caliber, but certain units may, special forces have been experimenting with things like this for a while now.
     
  10. BlackPaladin

    BlackPaladin

    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    50
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere out there
    Simply going to restate NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. 2 times a year the military lackies say they want to evaluate some new wing ding rife and cartridge. They never actually buy any of them, they just like to play with the test products.
     
  11. GlockinNJ

    GlockinNJ

    Messages:
    2,738
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Location:
    PRONJ
    I just read about LWRCI's Six8 in GNA. Sounds like it was made to answer this call.

    http://www.lwrci.com/articles/SGNLWRCsix8.pdf

    But I agree that it's probably easier to colonize Mars than change the primary weapon/caliber of the US military. The retooling of production facilities and equipment and associated systems would be enormous and not something Uncle Sam is willing to undertake, especially now that we are facing massive cuts in the DoD budget.

    The .223 works good enough.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  12. KalashniKEV

    KalashniKEV

    Messages:
    6,391
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2003
    Location:
    NoVA
    Physics demands it!

    ...too bad no one else does.

    Next...
     
  13. M&P15T

    M&P15T Beard One

    Messages:
    23,657
    Likes Received:
    5,998
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.
    Let's worry about producing enough 5.56, before we go running off half cocked about another "new" cartridge.

    Let's get civilian supplies of M193 rolling smoothly first.
     
  14. aircarver

    aircarver Descent Terminated Silver Member

    Messages:
    30,672
    Likes Received:
    8,671
    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, Republic of Texas
    Seems to me ballistics figured little in the adoption of 5.56 ...


    Logistics ruled: How many rounds can you cram in a boxcar ?

    .
     
  15. KalashniKEV

    KalashniKEV

    Messages:
    6,391
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2003
    Location:
    NoVA
    They still do... and always will.
     
  16. SC Tiger

    SC Tiger Jive Tiger

    Messages:
    23,691
    Likes Received:
    10,121
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I have heard the US Military had 1 billion rounds of .30-06 in stock at that time. When you think of it like that and figure in that this was right before WWII I believe, keeping the same caliber made sense.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  17. BigDeeeeeeee

    BigDeeeeeeee Reluctantly Deplorable!

    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    118
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2002
    Location:
    Kootenai County, I-Da-Hoe
  18. harlenm

    harlenm Millennium Member

    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    811
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 1999
    Location:
    CT
    .300 blackout, just need a new barrel in current ARs.
     
  19. banger

    banger

    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    423
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Location:
    Where evil lives
    Why won't it happen?

    Quite literally MILLIONS of M-16 rifles in service.

    BILLIONS on rounds in armories across the Globe.

    Dozen of countries wedded to the 556 platform.

    Millions of magazines, spare parts and accessories and spares in inventory.

    Countless dollars to obsolete what is considered by many to be a perfectly adequate system.

    I just don't see it happening.

    Lastly, if you look at the tables provided in the initial article, the new caliber simply does not offer a compelling enough reason to warrant a system wide re-arm.

    Sorry.

    A closing thought, further consider that the nation is already over 16 TRILLION Dollars in debt...Where would the money come from?...The Chinese...
     
  20. brisk21

    brisk21

    Messages:
    4,206
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Location:
    Michigan
    6.8 SPC seems like a good solution to me. Then let me have all the 5.56!!!