Joined
·
21,063 Posts
No thanks - it will pick up on the metal detector!
If you're referring to the CCF Raceframes, no, they're out of bidness. I have a stainless version but unfortunately the rear portion of the locking block broke. That part is a permanent installation with no replacement possible. It'll probably still work but I'm not taking any chances. I think the recoil impulse was such that the stiffness of the steel frame didn't allow for any flexing when the slide returned to battery. (for those in the know, yes, I'm aware of the differences in the locking block on the CCF vs the Glock. Per CCF's instructions, I was using the factory barrel, not an aftermarket) It was a joy to shoot and extremely accurate but it didn't last very long. I think Robar had some of their left over inventory a while back but most is probably all gone now.I haven't heard anything about the aluminum/steel frames for Glocks for years. Is that company still in business?
:rofl:No thanks - it will pick up on the metal detector!
I never gave that much thought 'til now, but I have to agree.The metal frames for Glocks never made a whole lot of sense to me.
I'm not a big fan of aluminum frame guns either.However, if I did buy one, I'd certainly go steel, not aluminum.
I have some great handguns with aluminum frames, but I'll always prefer steel.I'm not a big fan of aluminum frame guns either.
That's the impression I received from some of your posts that I've read.I have some great handguns with aluminum frames, but I'll always prefer steel.
The purpose, of course, is to make money in the pistol aftermarket parts arena. :supergrin: Beyond that, the stated advantages of a metal frame are: increased frame rigidity, thereby enhancing accuracy (aluminum/steel), recoil control due to increased weight (steel) allowing for quicker follow-up shots. Personally, with the CCF steel frame, I didn't notice an increase in my accuracy nor were my split times between shots decreased significantly, if at all. I did notice a significant difference in the feel of the trigger when making deliberately aimed, precision shots. Except for the frame, I was using the stock Glock parts. The trigger pull was much smoother and the shot break felt much cleaner. I can only attribute the nicer feel of the trigger to the rigidity of the frame allowing less "slop" in the interactions between the trigger bar/disconnector/striker.What is the purpose. If you have a purpose for a metal frame Glock, then explain.
I think Glock has proven, without question, that a polymer framed firearm is easy and cheap to produce, and actually lasts as long as the owner has interest in it, and also just as long as the metal framed firearms do.
Me also.....I just don't prefer the weight.I have some great handguns with aluminum frames, but I'll always prefer steel.
The purpose, of course, is to make money in the pistol aftermarket parts arena. :supergrin: Beyond that, the stated advantages of a metal frame are: increased frame rigidity, thereby enhancing accuracy (aluminum/steel), recoil control due to increased weight (steel) allowing for quicker follow-up shots. Personally, with the CCF steel frame, I didn't notice an increase in my accuracy nor were my split times between shots decreased significantly, if at all. I did notice a significant difference in the feel of the trigger when making deliberately aimed, precision shots. Except for the frame, I was using the stock Glock parts. The trigger pull was much smoother and the shot break felt much cleaner. I can only attribute the nicer feel of the trigger to the rigidity of the frame allowing less "slop" in the interactions between the trigger bar/disconnector/striker.
Since retiring the CCF frame, if I want to shoot a steel-framed handgun I'll pull out my Sig Scorpion Carry or S&W 686. If I want an aluminum framed gun I'll take along my Sig 226. But mostly, I'll take along my black/fde/od "Tupperware" 19, 17, 34, or 41. Or 30S. Or 26. Or . . .
No more pignose!What is the purpose....
No more pignose!![]()