Joined

·
845 Posts

1 - 20 of 32 Posts

Joined

·
845 Posts

Joined

·
14,500 Posts

They would be exactly the same because they both hit a steel plate.

Joined

·
5,681 Posts

I have been keeping this data in a little word processing file and decided I would share... If any moderators are looking they should probably make it a sticky 10mm Bullet Lengths------------------ Barnes 125gr HP pure copper bullet .624” Barnes 140gr HP pure copper bullet .682"...

www.glocktalk.com

Penetrate what?Imagine we have two hardcast bullets of the same profile, same diameter, differing only in weight and length. They are both launched so that they have identical momentum(e.g 155gr @1350fps and 180gr @1162fps). Which will penetrate further and why?

That is the unknown in your example.

Joined

·
845 Posts

Both fired into identical medium. Lets say ballistic gelatin.Penetrate what?

That is the unknown in your example.

Joined

·
34,074 Posts

More velocity = more resistance and less penetration.

Joined

·
40,929 Posts

Joined

·
3,921 Posts

Sounds

The 180 has potential to penetrate 32+ inches of gel, based on this test:

10mm Auto Self-Defense Ammo Ballistic Gel Tests - LuckyGunner.com Labs

180 Federal Trophy Bonded 32''+ penetration, no expansion, 1,227 fps

Bonus unsolicited thoughts on the 180 load:

If you are carrying for SD against a bear, reasonable choice.

Over penetrative for SD against human.

ETA the 155 would probably go 32+ inches of gel too based on a non-expanding HP with less velocity that did:

Handgun Self-Defense Ammunition - Ballistic Testing Data

Remington 155 HTP 32+ inches penetration, no expansion, 1075 fps

155 hard cast also over penetrative for SD against human attacker.

For the gold star 💥 as the only response directly answering the question!

Joined

·
34,074 Posts

But the lighter bullet in the OP's scenario IS being driven faster, hence why the momentums are the same. But as we both explained, the extra resistance from the higher velocity means the heavier bullet penetrates more. It really is more about that than about the SDs since momentums are the same.

From a math perspective I think a more interesting question is: how much more momentum (velocity) would the lighter bullet need in order to overcome the added resistance due to its higher velocity?

Joined

·
4,633 Posts

Where is the gell test to support the posited theoretical conclusions or to raise other issues?Both fired into identical medium. Lets say ballistic gelatin.

Joined

·
9,893 Posts

But momentum is not based only on velocity.From a math perspective I think a more interesting question is: how much more momentum (velocity) would the lighter bullet need in order to overcome the added resistance due to its higher velocity?

Joined

·
40,929 Posts

Why i said you would have to increase momentum with higher vel. SD is just another metric showing the ability of a bullet to penetrate.But the lighter bullet in the OP's scenario IS being driven faster, hence why the momentums are the same. But as we both explained, the extra resistance from the higher velocity means the heavier bullet penetrates more. It really is more about that than about the SDs since momentums are the same.

From a math perspective I think a more interesting question is: how much more momentum (velocity) would the lighter bullet need in order to overcome the added resistance due to its higher velocity?

Joined

·
40,929 Posts

So here is an example. The 165 has higher vel thus momentum, 181 v 167. Expansion is almost identical but the 180 is still higher SD. The diff on penetration is the addl momentum by raising vel.Where is the gell test to support the posited theoretical conclusions or to raise other issues?

| 22.4" |
| .49" | 1101 |

Hornady 180 gr XTP Custom |
| 20.9" |
| .50" | 933 |

Joined

·
1,785 Posts

The longer bullet goes deeper... Hmm, there are so many sex jokes to choose from.

Joined

·
14,500 Posts

1) How are you calculating this? I have not worked with sectional density much but I understand it is weight/diameter squared. For a 40 cal I get (155/7000)/.16 and (180/7000)/.16 or 138 and 160 ?Its called sectional density. In your example the 155 has a SD of 89, the 180 104.

2) Is this calculation always done with the beginning diameter? Doesn't this neglect the bigger final mushroomed diameter (if any) and the lessened penetration it would give?

Thanks.

Joined

·
9,893 Posts

Yes, and yes. It's simply comparative, not real world. It really is only defined at an impact velocity. Most LE trained "firearms experts" opposite of me use muzzle velocity. If my client is so inclined, pretty easy to get them excluded under Daubert for common and simple mistakes.2) Is this calculation always done with the beginning diameter? Doesn't this neglect the bigger final mushroomed diameter (if any) and the lessened penetration it would give?

Real world would take impact velocity, solid mechanics, computational fluid dynamics and the path through everything except STP air.

It is complex to do. It took a few hours to convince a judge that my methodology combined with MRI data was valid to prove an entrance velocity. That included three barriers prior to the skin. Skin, muscle, fat, bone, marrow, connective tissue and the organs all have energy thresholds for surface penetration and then traveling through. As the velocity decreases and the diameter increases, those variables change. Tearing, coring, cutting, smashing again, all have different levels of energy use.

After the hard work is done, it's actually easy to add up all the contributions from entry until final rest to come up with the entrance velocity.

That said, it's rarely beneficial to do the time consuming work to prove an entrance velocity as usually, it is only needed to prove distance from shooter to the person hit with a bullet. It's also why I am very careful what cases I take. 😎

Joined

·
40,929 Posts

There is actually a program i use. SD changes as the bullet expands, weight/dia sq, the expanding bullet dia is getting larger, weight is the same. Why its really a metric for solids, not expanding bullets, but its still relative. Drive identical weight bullets the same vel, the larger expanding bullet penetrates less.1) How are you calculating this? I have not worked with sectional density much but I understand it is weight/diameter squared. For a 40 cal I get (155/7000)/.16 and (180/7000)/.16 or 138 and 160 ?

2) Is this calculation always done with the beginning diameter? Doesn't this neglect the bigger final mushroomed diameter (if any) and the lessened penetration it would give?

Thanks.

Joined

·
40,929 Posts

But in the above example, no.The longer bullet goes deeper... Hmm, there are so many sex jokes to choose from.

Joined

·
845 Posts

Muscle is 1.04grams/cc

lead is 11.34grams/cc

180gr is .631"

155gr is .580"

The 180gr bullet is 9% longer than the 155gr.

Since according to Newton, penetration is directly proportional to object length, the 180gr bullet will always penetrate 9% further than the 155gr.

1 - 20 of 32 Posts

Glock Talk

A forum community dedicated to Glock firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, troubleshooting, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums

Alex Smith
969 Replies

DonGlock26
941 Replies

NoJoy
867 Replies

Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!