2nd Amendment: Definition of the right to bear "Arms"

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by TrustMyG23, Feb 23, 2013.

  1. TrustMyG23

    TrustMyG23

    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    deleted******
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2013
  2. jdeere_man

    jdeere_man CLM

    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    130
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    MO
    I don't disagree, but good luck finding a consensus on that.
     

  3. railfancwb

    railfancwb

    Messages:
    17,349
    Likes Received:
    18,045
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
    I agree. The Miller decision in the 1930s said as much by subjecting sawed off shotguns to NFA because they were not in use by the military.

    However, when the amendment is frequently misquoted that we "...have the right to bare arms...". :-(


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
  4. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Location:
    Tejas
    The wording has been read many ways by folks on both sides. Not sure it will ever be "settled" what the "meaning" is. Some folks think it means what you do, other point to things like "well regulated" as meaning it speaks of some type of "organized" control over firearm ownership.

    I think the 2nd As beauty and it's curse is it's brevity when it comes to debating it.

    I do not think the 2nd A is as all inclusive as some on here but I do think it is much more inclusive than some in America. The introduction of "hunting rights" into the debate and how widespread that is used in mainstream America today is pretty amazing to me.

    This debate is not going to end anytime soon.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  5. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    Messages:
    18,509
    Likes Received:
    12,302
    Joined:
    May 4, 2003
    It also says "bear".
     
  6. WT

    WT Millennium Member

    Messages:
    5,416
    Likes Received:
    4,400
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  7. jdeere_man

    jdeere_man CLM

    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    130
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    MO
    It also says that. Try to interpret that. Quite frankly any weapon could be considered dangerous
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  8. AsSeenOnTV

    AsSeenOnTV

    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Location:
    A liddo Northwest of you.....
    Yep, and the Vietnamese had the new weapon of a liberal media that gave them the technological advantage!
     
  9. CaptCave

    CaptCave

    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    32
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Location:
    NC
    And to get to that opinion, they had to completely ignore the fact that 'trench guns' were used in WW1.

    My opinion is Miller should have never happened.
     
  10. gwalchmai

    gwalchmai Lucky Member

    Messages:
    30,496
    Likes Received:
    11,470
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Outside the perimeter
    "Well regulated" means that the point of aim of the sights coincides with the point of impact of the bullet at the prescribed range. A well regulated militia is a group of citizen soldiers who can hit what they aim at.
     
  11. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Location:
    Tejas
    Interesting definition but one that could be logically challenged in a court of law IMO. Makes a heck of a bumper sticker though :supergrin:

    The debate that is going on is not for the folks that are already decided on the matter on either side. No one is changing their mind in those two groups. It is the undecided that will decide it to a large degree. I think the "arguments to convince" need to be tailored towards them.

    The other side does a better job than ours in many cases in my opinion. The whole "hunting" terminology trick has worked very well for them.
     
  12. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    Messages:
    59,815
    Likes Received:
    50,840
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Location:
    S FL
    :rofl::rofl:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. devildog2067

    devildog2067

    Messages:
    16,710
    Likes Received:
    2,094
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    Yep.

    Nope. It doesn't say any of that.

    "Nobody knows" because it's not a "fact".

    I happen to pretty much agree with you, but I also know the difference between "what I wish was true" and "facts." What you state is not a "fact."
     
  14. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer

    Messages:
    32,822
    Likes Received:
    29,905
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    I read where he seems to be saying arms means anything you can hold in your arms. Is that your understanding of what he says? If so, do you agree with that position?

    Seems like hand grenades, machine guns, and bazookas should be legal then. But no fighter jets, tanks, or battleships.

    I don't know for sure, but I guess I'm ok with that. But we gotta do a better job locking up dangerous criminals because I wouldn't want them able to buy those things at the hardware store like the rest of us should be able to without background checks.

    ___________
    I joined the NRA, have you yet?
     
  15. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    Messages:
    59,815
    Likes Received:
    50,840
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Location:
    S FL
    I agree. Just because a statement sounds really good does not mean it is a fact. Just because a statement we want to be a fact does not mean it is a fact. Just because we read some stuff we may not be on the same level as people who have advanced degrees and study, teach, and render judgement on Constitutional issues.


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2013
  16. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Location:
    Tejas
    Root of the problem. People read the same words and come away with different meanings. Also why the founders put measures in place to be able to settle the disagreements as they occurred. Heck they could hardly agree on them as they wrote them so not sure why we should expect it to be any different now. :dunno:

    I am not in favor of a boundless 2nd A myself. Someday one of you guys would have your own Deathstar.

    [​IMG]

    I am not OK with that.



    :tongueout:



    And for the record nobody is using Bazookas anymore :supergrin:
     
  17. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Messages:
    63,403
    Likes Received:
    60,180
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Well, it says "arms"...nothing else you wrote there is true, but it does say "arms.":upeyes:
     
  18. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer

    Messages:
    32,822
    Likes Received:
    29,905
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    I most certainly would use Bazookas.

    I was just out clanging the gong with my .44 magnum revolver. If legally allowed, I'd love to buy a WWII era bazooka, hopefully find some ammo, and shoot it out back, maybe blow up an old washing machine or something like that :)



    ___________
    I joined the NRA, have you yet?
     
  19. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    Messages:
    10,280
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Location:
    Tejas
    Oh I would too. :supergrin:

    My dad carried one in the Marines back in the 50s. But the U.S. Military is not using them any more was my point. :)
     
  20. stevemc

    stevemc

    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    If you think in the context of the times, arms were probably black powder actuated firearms. The "Government" they were concerned with was probably more the crown of England, and their laws concerning citizens rights than their newly formed union. I believe there was more national pride and willingness to fight common enemies, than fearful suspicion of the homeland government.