close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

26 States Decline ObamaCare Exchange; 'Administrative Nightmare' Seen

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by snerd, Dec 14, 2012.

  1. snerd

    snerd Deep State

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,300
    Likes Received:
    10,917
    Location:
    Oklahoma!
    Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/121412-63...inistrative-nightmare-seen.aspx#ixzz2F4h0xhAb

    This is going to be a cluster****.
     
  2. janice6

    janice6 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    35,884
    Likes Received:
    23,688
    Location:
    minnesota
    More control. What the Government wants. It means more money.
     

  3. stevelyn

    stevelyn NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,205
    Likes Received:
    4,615
    Location:
    Fairbanksan in Aleutian Hell
    Good. The more of a goat-rope it becomes, the better it's chances at failing.
     
  4. engineer151515

    engineer151515

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    14,291
    Likes Received:
    471
    The Democrats wanted it. They got it.


    Since when have the Feds shied away from bloated, inefficient, expensive bureaucracy?
     
  5. engineer151515

    engineer151515

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    14,291
    Likes Received:
    471
    The Democrats wanted it. They got it.


    Since when have the Feds shied away from bloated, inefficient, expensive bureaucracy?
     
  6. ken grant

    ken grant

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    578
    Location:
    middle ga.
    The goal of the healthcare law is for the Feds to take over the control of all healthcare.

    These states are just playing into the Feds goal.

    Single payer, Fed control is what the law wants.
     
  7. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    12,129
    Likes Received:
    9
    The problem is the Feds can't do it as the law specifically says they are not funded to do it! It's the last chance we have of getting rid of it! The people said we didn't want it and it was Unconstitutional the SCOTUS changed it to make Constitutional- in the ruling that in itself was Unconstitutional. Cause as worded in the law it wasn't a tax it was a penalty! Now the States are saying no you wanted this BS you run it cause we can't afford it! Now the Feds have two choices let it fold under it own weight or go back and change the law to allow funding! That means they have to vote in the House to change the law! So we can force through Repeal!:supergrin:
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2012
  8. pugman

    pugman

    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Messages:
    6,280
    Likes Received:
    493
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    And we have a winner.

    Remember, when Obamacare was originally discussed and proposed the goal was a single payer system much like Medicare.

    I work for the largest healthcare insurance provider in the country. Realistically, behind closed doors the big boys (United, the Blues, Cigna and Aetna) have discussed a single payer is nearly impossible at this stage of the game - 3-4 maybe. This isn't to say ten years down the road it might finally be down to one.

    And of course you ARE going to get pushback from hospitals and physicans. Remember, for the first two years Obamacare reimburses at MedicCARE rates - then it goes to MedicAID rates. There is a reason Medicaid is considered the payer of last resort.

    I wish I could find the model which showed how this would work...it set up tens if not hundreds of additonal federal agencies and the crossowalk gave me a headache even looking at it.
     
  9. sbhaven

    sbhaven

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    4,783
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Constitution State
    The Obamacare organizational chart....
    [​IMG]
     
  10. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    13,286
    Likes Received:
    366
    Good!

    This might actually be the end of it.

    The R's were outnumbered and couldn't stop it.
    Roberts went full on retart and wouldn't stop it.
    An electorate with critical thinking fail wouldn't unelect it.

    So it may end up destroying itself. Created to be unworkable due to dem stupidity and pollyanna-ish wishing the world were perfect, they run up against logistics and arithmetic. Serves the idiots right.