[Zombie Steve]

Not for me...

 

[PlasticGuy]

They feel wierd, and look terrible. Gimme a short or medium length conventional trigger and I'm a whole lot happier.

 

[fnfalman]

It's your gun so whatever floats your boat.

I don't think that the flat trigger is any less gimmicky than skeletonized hammers with the oblong shape instead of round shape. Or a thumb safety with "this" type of curved extension versus "that' type of curved extension.

 

[Zagato]

seems like the only difference is the trigger finger extends a bit more. The trigger pulls straight back, curved or straight.

Little handed fellas probably prefer the curved.

 

[SVTNate]

I've never tried one, but I prefer a medium or long length solid trigger myself.

What I can't stand are 3-hole triggers on a 1911, and unfortunately most come with the darn things these days (like those awful looking front cocking serrations)

 

[Comedian]

I recently felt a flat trigger on a Sig Scorpion 1911 and it actually hurt my finger slightly. So long, curved for me.

 

[brisk21]

No. They are terribly ugly.

 

[hogship]

What I can't stand are 3-hole triggers on a 1911, and unfortunately most come with the darn things these days (like those awful looking front cocking serrations)

Ya.......those "skeletonized" triggers are just as ugly as flat triggers.

What would be really repulsive is a skeletonized flat trigger.

ooc

 

[M&P Shooter]

I went with this trigger after looking at photos of different 1911's and realized the flat trigger looks very ugly.

http://www.midwayusa.com/product/156142/ed-brown-videki-national-match-trigger-1911-aluminum-silver

 

[G26S239]

I went with this trigger after looking at photos of different 1911's and realized the flat trigger looks very ugly.

http://www.midwayusa.com/product/156142/ed-brown-videki-national-match-trigger-1911-aluminum-silver

:thumbsup:

 

[NeverMore1701]

Ya.......those "skeletonized" triggers are just as ugly as flat triggers.

What would be really repulsive is a skeletonized flat trigger.

ooc