Last Activity:
Apr 5, 2020 at 2:45 PM
Sep 23, 2005
Likes Received:
Trophy Points:
Oct 26, 1946 (Age: 73)
Home Page:
Los Angeles


73, from Los Angeles

bdcochran was last seen:
Engaged in conversation, Apr 5, 2020 at 2:45 PM
    1. Mrs Glockrunner
      Mrs Glockrunner
      Thanks for the input on the murders in 1910. 99% of the jokes I post are ones that have been forwarded to me in emails. If I think any of them are way out of whack, I'll check for accuracy, or just not post.

      I'm glad you're enjoying my posts. I appreciate the kind words. I try to have a wide range of jokes for people to read and enjoy.

      Have a great day!
    2. lawman800
      What kind of class are they running there this month? Edged weapon defense/tactics?
    3. quake
      (2nd part; due to character-limit)

      Also, the lens (5mm on a 1/5" imager) is relatively "tight", providing a pretty narrow picture. At a distance of 20 feet, you’ll likely get a viewing area of maybe 10 feet wide. That’s pretty narrow. For a hallway or watching a specific door or such, it’s probably fine; but for an “area” view up close, there will be a lot of non-viewable space.

      Don’t mean to sound negative on it; DLink is usually good stuff. I just don’t have any experience with this particular product. If you do try it, I’d be curious how it works for you.
    4. quake
      It's an abnormally-small imager at 1/5"; most retail-sold cameras are 1/4", and most professionally-installed ones are 1/3". May not be a true problem, but that means the imager is a chip 1/5” x 1/5” (0.2” by 0.2”) square, and so has only 0.04" of space to receive and recognize an image; just 36% of the area of a 1/3" imager. Typically this means just less light-gathering ability and resolution, and the resolution seems to be an issue in this case. It lists a maximum resolution of 240 lines if running full video of 30fps. My suggestion would be to turn the fps down to 20fps, to get double the resolution. Fwiw, the cameras we install run 520 lines of resolution and up, and I personally wouldn’t want less; but there’s nothing really ‘wrong’ with it.
    5. LongGun1

      I think sometimes many think they will be just as effective during a bad SHTF as during good times shooting in perfect weather from a benchrest at a paper target! Like you stated...big difference. I know what real hunger is & how it can effect performance...the same with bitter cold, sweltering heat, have-not-slept-for-days fatigue, fever, etc. Same goes for practicing under the above conditions...low light & night as well!
      So I favor any edge I can get to compensate for less than favorable well as against numeric disparity combined with the element of surprise. So....the most effective weapon for the majority of SHTF scenarios I can envision is the electro-optic dot sighted AR, AK or similar.... fairly lightweight, compact, reliable, low recoil, high capacity, accurate, easy to operate/maintain/etc & quick to acquire targets 0-300m under all lighting conditions. Not only for me...but those less capable/less familiar with weapons also. :)
    6. Bolster
      No, I WISH I knew Kydex. I don't. Sorry!
    7. AK_Stick
      How long ago was that?

      Lights, and fighting with them has come a LOOOOONG way in the last few years. Alot of the methods and thoughts of older training have been changed, or flat out disproven with the modern lights.

      It was one thing when tac lights were new and not nearly as bright as today. But with the modern lights like the X300,400 TLR series. They far outstripe any of the older stuff.
    8. syntaxerrorsix
      If a knife is all you can have, more power to you. It doesn't improve their defensive characteristics. Like I said in the post, it's better than a short pointy stick. Besides, the posters talking about knives for defense in that particular thread were talking about 4" folders. If I'm carrying a knife for defense it will the biggest pointiest one I can find :)
    9. quake
    10. quake
      Just the generic Nite-Ize "C/D Upgrade" version that's $8 or so at walmart, or at least used to be. It's shaped like an old-style flanged flashlight bulb so it can be used in a lot of different lights. Doesn't put out anywhere near the light of the mag-led LED's, but works fine for what we use it for - just general walking-around light in a dark house during outages. For task lights or intense, up-close work, you'd want something better but it's good for what it is.
    11. volsbear
      Maybe. But bad chinese buffets is a legitimate threat as well.
    12. wonderwolf
      No I understand, I was playing devils advocate kinda. I've shot a lot of night matches with just irons and a rail mounted light. And a lot more long range matches in failing light. I understand the virtues of a scope but saying one is required?? Generally I see people buying 6-28X power scopes and are surprised when something is so close as 200 yards and they have trouble tracking the target or can't find it. I guess from what I took from your comment was that you had to scope and dope all the rifles. I've known my share of "old guys" who have trouble seeing the front sight at camp perry. They usually flank me on the line and tell me how lucky I am to be young and not need glasses.
    13. lawman800
      True that. I am not that advanced in my rifle craft. I was happy to be able to hit the 9x and 10x consistently on a B-27 from the 50 yard prone in outdoor slight breeze conditions on a shared Mini-14.
    14. lawman800
      Did you mean to send this to me?
    15. bdcochran
      Thank you.
    16. MajorAmby
      Sup man, I've been reading some of your posts and you seem to know what the heck you're talking about!
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • About

    Oct 26, 1946 (Age: 73)
    Home Page:
    Los Angeles