close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Zimmerman and Common Sense

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Amsdorf, Mar 31, 2012.

  1. AA#5

    AA#5

    5,099
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    I agree 100%. Whether or not the shooting was justified, Zimmerman's first mistake was playing cop & private eye.

    The police would have probably questioned Martin & said "Have a nice day" & there wouldn't have been any fight.
     


  2. Dexters

    Dexters

    4,191
    2
    May 3, 2004
    ga
    I agree with what you wrote.

    "Perhaps not, at that point, but…his, literally, fatal error was choosing to ignore the police department’s instruction to NOT pursue, to NOT follow, to let the police handle it. "

    Isn't the above still in question. I remember reading that Z might have been getting back or going to his car when attacked.

    Search the net there are some stories about it.

    Bottom line on Z case - if he was wrong we will never hear the end of it. If T was wrong, it will slowly fade away.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012
  3. Rumbler_G20

    Rumbler_G20

    344
    4
    Dec 5, 2011
    N. Florida

    I have a question please.

    How do you "report and observe" what you can not see?


    You make the case that was his "duty". So I'm just wondering how he could do that without following Martin. Which, by the way, is absolutely NOT illegal or even immoral, at least in Florida.:dunno:
     
  4. DOC44

    DOC44

    15,726
    4,736
    Jan 10, 2004
    in my recliner
    A little information is a dangerous thing.... what did Z do? did he continue to follow T or did he return to his car? both accounts are out there. both cannot be true.

    Doc44
     
  5. G-19

    G-19

    1,735
    0
    Jul 1, 2004
    We need to wait until all the facts are in before casting judgement, either way.

    I also agree that it is sad that the death of this young man is being used as a racial issue.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012
  6. LASTRESORT20

    LASTRESORT20 LongTerm-Guy

    18,566
    26,261
    Aug 10, 2010
    NC

    Good point....and now all wait for the facts....well...maybe not all it seems.
     
  7. RC-RAMIE

    RC-RAMIE

    2,700
    1
    Mar 8, 2010
    I won't comment on if Z was right or wrong because I don't have enough info. Personally when I CCW I become more concerned with my and my family safety and less concerned with other peoples property and go way out of my way to avoid confrontations.


    "Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it is realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy. - Ron Paul
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012
  8. HarleyGuy

    HarleyGuy

    3,420
    132
    Mar 29, 2008
    All of this will rely on two decisions:

    If the state decides to charge Zimmerman and if they do, the verdict of the jury.

    Until Zimmerman has had his day in court and proven either innocent or guilty, in the eyes of the law he is to be considered innocent.
     
  9. DOC44

    DOC44

    15,726
    4,736
    Jan 10, 2004
    in my recliner
    somebody needs to tell Al and Jessie how the law works.... well since holder is in charge I don't guess it works anymore the way it is supposed to.

    Doc44
     
  10. hogship

    hogship It's MY Island

    It's been over 30 years ago that I was a Sheriff's and Highway Patrol dispatcher. Back then, I was the one who answered the phone and talked to those seeking emergency LEO, ambulance, and fire department assistance.

    These thoughts keep occurring for me in the Zimmerman case:

    Although told to do so by the 911 dispatcher, Zimmerman had no legal obligation to not pursue Martin. (Hindsight in this case is 20/20.) I would think the decision for him to participate was still open to his own personal evaluation, up until the moment police were physically present. After all, his eyes, ears, and instincts are more valid than a someone on the phone. He is certainly responsible for his own actions at all times, and will need to deal with the consequences of his actions.

    If he was there and armed, couldn't it be assumed this was part of what was considered his responsibilities? I don't know the answer to that, but it seems that apprehension, detention and/or armed response is certainly in the cards......no?

    I'm not making any judgements here.......just commenting on aspects of the case that might be worthy of discussion.

    On another note, if Martin was beating on Zimmerman, I doubt the gun was anywhere but concealed until after the physical altercation was under way (It would be foolish to assume Martin began beating on Zimmerman, knowing he was armed.)......I don't know that the gun only came into action after physical battery had started, but if it were the case, it would indicate something for consideration by those who are open to the idea that Zimmerman had planned to shoot Martin all along........can that be assumed?

    ooc
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2012