close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Your input please

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by Alliance50, May 15, 2012.


  1. Alliance50

    Alliance50
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    524
    1
    Location:
    Where ever ccw permits are allowed!
    OK
    Thru many yrs of handling firearms, Being trained and being the trainer I have come to form some opinions on three kinds of handguns.
    To start the 1911 from any manufacture, the Sig sauer particularly to the P series and the glock.

    I have come to the conclusion for me of course is those three type of hand guns to be the most reliable, the easiest to get just about any part and do the work myself, And for me all three carry and shoot very well. OH I forgot I also think when it comes to DETAIL stripping those three are also the easiest.
    Now the XD's and XDM's are coming close but it seems that getting parts for those are still limited.

    So give your thoughts and maybe talk about the weapons you feel that way about.

    It seems that to many guns either need to be sent in to be repaired even for simple repairs or a Gunsmith is required.
    Time consuming and expensive as far as I am concerned.

    SO what do you all think?:wavey:
     
    #1 Alliance50, May 15, 2012
    Last edited: May 15, 2012
  2. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo
    Expand Collapse
    Ancient Member
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 1999
    987
    111
    Location:
    Free Republic of Tejas
    deleted
     

    #2 Ronaldo, May 15, 2012
    Last edited: May 15, 2012
  3. TSAX

    TSAX
    Expand Collapse
    USAF Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    10,162
    6
    The same of what your saying can be said for holsters, sights and other accessories.

    Glocks and 1911's will probably always have the most parts available/accessories because of popularity and its stronghold on the market. The Sig P series is also popular but its not as easy to do it yourself gunsmithing as Glocks and 1911's are. The same can be said for XD/XDM's. Im on the XD site and these guns are gaining in popularity but these guns arent that easy to do it yourself gunsmith and do a full take down/disassemble like the Glock and 1911 platforms.

    In a few more years I would guess there will be more parts/accessories available. When XD's first came out they took a little time to gain traction and slowly people/companies started making things for them. Just looking at the GT vs XD sites, the GT and 1911 sites has much more posts, users, threads, etc.

    Another example would be the availability of triggers. XD/XDM has 3 main ones and they cost about $100 to $200, Springfield Custom Shop, Powder River Precision and Springer. The 1911 trigger availability is endless like the Glocks. Just look at the Vanek, Fulcrum, Skimmer on the higher end. Ghost and the simple "-" connector or heck a do it yourself polish job on the internals for low cost. And several more options in between.









    :50cal:
     
    #3 TSAX, May 15, 2012
    Last edited: May 15, 2012
  4. ronin.45

    ronin.45
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    11,340
    780
    Location:
    NE OHIO
    The 1911 and Glock compare favorably where parts and accessories are concerned. I'm always amazed when people compare them about detail stripping. The 1911 has way more parts and on a modern gun they are much tighter fitted. I can understand how stripping a 1911 can be considered easy once you've mastered it, but in no way is it as easy as a Glock.

    The Sig doesn't have near the aftermarket support for parts and accessories and probably falls in the middle on detail stripping.
     
  5. Steve in Az

    Steve in Az
    Expand Collapse
    Glock 26

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2000
    1,314
    29
    Location:
    Arizona
    I've tried 2 Sig's in the past; a P229 and P239, and neither work well for my high-thumbs grip. Both were fantastic/accurate guns, they just didn't work for me ergonomically. Same for a bunch of others (M&P, Steyr, the list goes on) all great guns, they just didn't have the whole package I was looking for. I keep coming back to Glock's (since 1987) for 3 reasons:

    1. Sans catestrophic failure, I can fix it myself---inexpensively
    2. Simple, durable, reliable, and accurate
    3. They fit my style of grip

    I simply haven't found a gun that posesses all of these traits like the Glock, for it's niche purpose. Of course I'm a HUGE fan of the 1911, and parts for that are everywhere, it just doesn't fit my CCW role.
     
    #5 Steve in Az, May 15, 2012
    Last edited: May 15, 2012