close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

You vote for Romney because Ron Paul would never win...but...

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Eurodriver, Oct 4, 2012.


  1. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc
    Expand Collapse
    MAJ (USA Ret.)

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    34,969
    9
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    Personally, I blame the candidate and his supporters.

    The candidate was lame. The supporters were repulsive.

    Both made their beds, and now will sleep in it. If you want to know why, you need a mirror, not a spotlight.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    9,217
    1,855
    Wow, two anti-Romney threads with IDENTICAL titles. What are the odds? :rofl:
     

  3. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc
    Expand Collapse
    MAJ (USA Ret.)

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    34,969
    9
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    Sent from either dailypaul or ronpaulforums.

    They are desperate to avoid the irrelevance that they have achieved.
     
  4. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    9,217
    1,855
    Paulistas remind me a little of...

    [​IMG]

    "Did you say 'over'? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"
     
  5. Jerry

    Jerry
    Expand Collapse
    Staff Member Moderator Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 1998
    4,116
    1
    Location:
    Louisiana
    No argument! But I still would like to have seen the outcome.
     
  6. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    9,217
    1,855
    Here's an idea. How about Paulistas focus on winning local offices, like Mayor and City Councilman. They could balance local budgets, impose strict fiscal policies and spend within their own limits. They could reduce or even eliminate the inefficient and unnecessary programs, and show fiscal surpluses.

    Once they proved their success at the local level, they could move up to statewide offices like State Senator and Governor. There they could test and prove the efficacy of their ideas and fiscal policies. They could run a state and turn it into one of the best in the nation in terms of quality of life and growth. Jobs and businesses would flock to those cities and states, if the ideas worked well.

    After proving their ideas work at the local and statewide levels, Paulistas could at least point out the successes of their programs rather than simply throwing bombs and critiquing programs put in place by others. Instead of grabbing for the whole pie, like the Presidency, try starting with a slice, like Mayor or Governor.

    It’s easy to criticize; it’s quite another to govern, at any level.
     
  7. Syclone538

    Syclone538
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    2,086
    0
    He probably would have vetoed the same % of bills that he voted against. I think that would be a huge step in the right direction.
     
  8. Diesel McBadass

    Diesel McBadass
    Expand Collapse
    Tactically Epic

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    10,135
    613
    Location:
    Dover NH
    the two party system exists because most people support one of the parties, the third party types are in the minority usually cause most people dont support them. Its simple.
     
  9. Gundude

    Gundude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    7,379
    469
    That you both missed the point again is unsurprising. Look at the text in my opening post of the other thread for a hint.
     
  10. Gundude

    Gundude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    7,379
    469
    Wow, two IDENTICAL incorrect and clueless posts. What are the odds? :rofl: