close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

You vote for Romney because Ron Paul would never win...but...

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Eurodriver, Oct 4, 2012.

  1. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    Personally, I blame the candidate and his supporters.

    The candidate was lame. The supporters were repulsive.

    Both made their beds, and now will sleep in it. If you want to know why, you need a mirror, not a spotlight.
     
  2. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty

    9,581
    2,150
    Jul 9, 2005
    Wow, two anti-Romney threads with IDENTICAL titles. What are the odds? :rofl:
     


  3. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    Sent from either dailypaul or ronpaulforums.

    They are desperate to avoid the irrelevance that they have achieved.
     
  4. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty

    9,581
    2,150
    Jul 9, 2005
    Paulistas remind me a little of...

    [​IMG]

    "Did you say 'over'? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"
     
  5. Jerry

    Jerry Staff Member Moderator Millennium Member

    4,116
    1
    Dec 21, 1998
    Louisiana
    No argument! But I still would like to have seen the outcome.
     
  6. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty

    9,581
    2,150
    Jul 9, 2005
    Here's an idea. How about Paulistas focus on winning local offices, like Mayor and City Councilman. They could balance local budgets, impose strict fiscal policies and spend within their own limits. They could reduce or even eliminate the inefficient and unnecessary programs, and show fiscal surpluses.

    Once they proved their success at the local level, they could move up to statewide offices like State Senator and Governor. There they could test and prove the efficacy of their ideas and fiscal policies. They could run a state and turn it into one of the best in the nation in terms of quality of life and growth. Jobs and businesses would flock to those cities and states, if the ideas worked well.

    After proving their ideas work at the local and statewide levels, Paulistas could at least point out the successes of their programs rather than simply throwing bombs and critiquing programs put in place by others. Instead of grabbing for the whole pie, like the Presidency, try starting with a slice, like Mayor or Governor.

    It’s easy to criticize; it’s quite another to govern, at any level.
     
  7. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    2,086
    0
    Jan 8, 2006
    He probably would have vetoed the same % of bills that he voted against. I think that would be a huge step in the right direction.
     
  8. Diesel McBadass

    Diesel McBadass Tactically Epic

    10,182
    649
    Apr 15, 2011
    Dover NH
    the two party system exists because most people support one of the parties, the third party types are in the minority usually cause most people dont support them. Its simple.
     
  9. Gundude

    Gundude

    7,464
    499
    Mar 7, 2003
    That you both missed the point again is unsurprising. Look at the text in my opening post of the other thread for a hint.
     
  10. Gundude

    Gundude

    7,464
    499
    Mar 7, 2003
    Wow, two IDENTICAL incorrect and clueless posts. What are the odds? :rofl: