close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Yep, let's legalize drugs...

Discussion in 'Civil Liberties Issues' started by Detectorist, Jan 8, 2013.

  1. syntaxerrorsix

    syntaxerrorsix Anti-Federalist CLM

    9,406
    125
    Oct 3, 2000
    Lakeland, FL.
    The real point you still fail to see is that the Federal drug laws are unconstitutional. Those laws are the responsibility of the State according to the Tenth Amendment.

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Of course you can keep supporting the perversion of our laws and justify it anyway you like. It will still be funny when you start *****ing about how the government doesn't protect the laws and rights that support your agenda.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  2. series1811

    series1811 Enforcerator. CLM


    The real point is you seem to think that your opinion is controlling authority.

    The founding fathers saw this one coming.
     


  3. syntaxerrorsix

    syntaxerrorsix Anti-Federalist CLM

    9,406
    125
    Oct 3, 2000
    Lakeland, FL.
    If you can find a shred of evidence that can support federal drug laws after reading the 10A I'll be impressed. Want me to wait?

    Or is this going to be another one of those moments when you realize you can't support your argument similar to your attempt at judicial review?

    Did you even spend 15 minutes and Google it? Were you shocked when you discovered the Marbury v Madison was essential a power grab and that it was never presented to the people or states for ratification? Just an assumed power afterwards?

    No, probably not. You continue on with platitudes and coy remarks. You've got it all figured out and fully accept that the government is your master.

    Enjoy it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  4. Ohio Cop

    Ohio Cop

    5,487
    416
    Mar 1, 2012
    The Rust Belt.
    And again I reiterate, how does it feel that no matter what you type you are still wrong?
     
  5. syntaxerrorsix

    syntaxerrorsix Anti-Federalist CLM

    9,406
    125
    Oct 3, 2000
    Lakeland, FL.

    Your opinion has been found wanting. You don't seem to be able to debate with facts either. So I feel fine knowing that some people can't be re-taught things they hold sacrosanct.
     
  6. Ohio Cop

    Ohio Cop

    5,487
    416
    Mar 1, 2012
    The Rust Belt.
    I can live in fact.

    This is what I abide by:

    http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2925

    I can't really recall ever enforcing a federal law. If we do, I've never seen a summons for one :tongueout:

    This is all I do. Catching an addict with three grams of Heroin isn't going to land him in Club Fed. Even the guys charged with aggravated trafficking are charged through the lower courts.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  7. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    51,971
    4,422
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    I take this post as confirmation that if the law says you must seize guns, you will. You abide by the code.

    I suspect you'll beat your chest about it too, what with all the guns you see associated with crime.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  8. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    39,325
    10,094
    Jan 3, 2010
    S FL
    :rofl::rofl:

    I am uncertain it is to our advantage as a species to have school crossing guards at high schools.
     
  9. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    41,593
    8,229
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    I agree. Do they have those now? My generation survived, or didn't, without crossing guards.
     
  10. Ohio Cop

    Ohio Cop

    5,487
    416
    Mar 1, 2012
    The Rust Belt.

    I have already taken guns via court order. :tongueout:
     
  11. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    51,971
    4,422
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    You can make a joke about it but I think it's obvious what side of that line you will be on if guns are ever made illegal.

    You will.....enforce the law.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  12. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    33,378
    2,756
    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    Which law would that be?
     
  13. Ohio Cop

    Ohio Cop

    5,487
    416
    Mar 1, 2012
    The Rust Belt.
    You compare arrests for drug offenses to me taking guns door to door?

    :whistling:
     
  14. Ohio Cop

    Ohio Cop

    5,487
    416
    Mar 1, 2012
    The Rust Belt.

    None. He is just being as anti-LE as he always is.
     
  15. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    51,971
    4,422
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    Certainly.
     
  16. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    51,971
    4,422
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    I'm not anti LE
     
  17. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    33,378
    2,756
    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    Of course not. You are just anti anyone who enforces laws with which you disagree. :thumbsup:
     
  18. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    51,971
    4,422
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    I'm not that either

    My community uses stop signs to enforce residential speed limits. I disagree with that but I hold no animosity toward the LEO who writes the tickets
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  19. syntaxerrorsix

    syntaxerrorsix Anti-Federalist CLM

    9,406
    125
    Oct 3, 2000
    Lakeland, FL.
    Fixed it for you.