close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Would You Take Away Guns From Law-Abiding Citizens?

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by snerd, Jul 2, 2012.

  1. snerd

    snerd

    13,381
    3,964
    Apr 20, 2007
    Roy Huntington at American Handgunner Magazine is conducting a poll and posted in American Cop Magazine.......
     
  2. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    I, and about 5000 friends from 1st Cav were asked to do exactly that by the LA governor and the NO Mayor. We said no. Too bad everyone else didn't say no. Most did, but some didn't.
     

    Last edited: Jul 2, 2012

  3. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon "Cracker"

    11,018
    2
    Feb 18, 2009
  4. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    52,409
    4,767
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
    Hats off to you and the 1st Cav, Doc.
     
  5. HexHead

    HexHead

    4,815
    0
    Jul 16, 2009
    It should be noted that in the wake of the Katrina gun grab, several states passed laws banning gun confiscations during emergencies. TN was one of them.
     
  6. The Machinist

    The Machinist No Compromise

    6,350
    324
    Sep 20, 2009
    The Left Coast
    God bless you! That was the act of a patriot.
     
  7. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    No sweat, it's not difficult NOT doing bad things.
     
  8. JBnTX

    JBnTX Bible Thumper

    20,016
    4,161
    Aug 28, 2008
    Texas
    Why doesn't Roy Huntington post a public poll instead of having LEO's contact him privately, where the results will only be known to him?

    Sounds like a limp wristed way of making sure it's safe before going public with the information?

    I'm betting that the majority of police officers will follow orders
    and confiscate all firearms when told to do so.

    Cops will talk smack on the internet, but in real life they'll do what they're told. They'll put themselves first and not risk their jobs.

    ..
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2012
  9. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    Maybe I'm mistaken. But I sense you are being a bit over the top. That call was made without hesitation by the task force commander supported unanimously by all the staff.

    It's an illustration of the complete inadequacy and ignorance of the New Orleans and Louisiana elected government.

    We also refused to forcibly evacuate citizens. Posse comitatus and the 2nd amendment trumped their requests, that's all.
     
  10. rgregoryb

    rgregoryb Sapere aude

    8,303
    1,238
    Oct 20, 2004
    Republic of Alabama
    I am retired now, but as a LEO I would never confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens
     
  11. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    A lot of that would depend on where you are. An urban cop in Chicago would probably not go the same way as a rural Constible in Texas.
     
  12. The Machinist

    The Machinist No Compromise

    6,350
    324
    Sep 20, 2009
    The Left Coast
    I meant what I said, Doc. :supergrin:
     
  13. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    Sorry, my bad.
     
  14. bruzer

    bruzer

    624
    0
    Apr 18, 2011
    Grants Pass, Oregon
    This is the problem as I see it. Laws will be enacted. Not over night but over time. The Law Abiding Citizen will eventually become the law breaker if they don't voluntarily give up their guns when asked to do so. So when the Government moves in to confiscate guns they will be acting within the laws. You and I are now criminals and no longer Law Abiding Citizens. So when the question is asked, "Would you take away guns from Law-Abiding Citizens?". The answer is of coarse, "No". But unfortunately we will become the criminals when the time is right.
    Good luck and stay safe,
    Mike
     
  15. Gunhaver

    Gunhaver the wrong hands

    2,736
    0
    Jan 24, 2012
    That's exactly it right there. Most cops would tell you that they think a 15 round mag is not too many for a civilian to have in his gun at one time but I'll bet every last one in California would bust you for having one. It's not about what they think is right. It's about the opportunity to make an arrest. Shotgun barrel a 1/4" too short? Snapped a foregrip on your Glock rail? Don't have just the right mix of import and domestic parts on your AK? If a cop catches you chances are it's jail time. Has nothing to do with lethality or anything other than what the legislators agreed on as far as the cops are concerned.

    I have no reason to believe it would be any different if semi-autos or polymer frames or laser sights or just firearms altogether were made illegal.
     
  16. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon "Cracker"

    11,018
    2
    Feb 18, 2009
    You support wealth confiscation so why not gun confiscation.
     
  17. Gunhaver

    Gunhaver the wrong hands

    2,736
    0
    Jan 24, 2012
    You gonna follow me all around the forum shoving that up my a** now? This here is a different thread.

    For 9 years now I've been a firearms instructor with a lot of liberal friends and I've been an ambassador to the shooting sports to every one of them. I have a standing offer to all my friends and anyone they know to come to the range with me and shoot a free box of ammo just to show them how much fun it can be. I've probably spent several thousand dollars on ammo in that time. I have 12 pistols and 3 rifles for them to choose from and I'd estimate that I'm personally responsible for convincing well over 100 people to go purchase their own handgun and more than half of them have gotten carry permits. I find my method much more effective than standing around here preaching to the choir. Last I checked this was a firearms forum, not an Obamacare haters forum.

    So would you have me go back and unravel all that effort? Let every one of them know that the gun owners on Glocktalk don't want their support unless their political leanings all fall right in line with the GOP? All because you can't handle the fact that I have a sick friend and thought maybe ACA wouldn't be such a bad thing for her?

    Some of you guys here are exactly what keeps a lot of people from wanting to learn anything about guns because you're exactly what they envision when they think of a gun owner. I guarantee that I've done a lot more to further the Second Amendment that you have but you could maybe catch up with me just by keeping your mouth shut for the next 9 years.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2012
  18. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    See, that's the problem. We all remember what you say in all the threads you post in, and will consider what you say forever more in that context. Don't fret about it, be comfortable in your own skin.
     
  19. snerd

    snerd

    13,381
    3,964
    Apr 20, 2007
  20. Walt_NC

    Walt_NC

    346
    0
    Aug 25, 2010
    Noncompliace with an illegal order is easy. More difficult hypothitical scenario:

    Let's say that the Constitution was amended in a legal manner so as to revoke and repeal the 2nd Amendment. Laws were passed prohibiting ownership of firearms and requiring them to be relinquished.

    Would you, as a hypothetical cop, then obey your sworn oath to the rule of law and carry out the lawful order to confiscate guns?