close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Worth looking at

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by allrad, Aug 1, 2011.

  1. allrad

    allrad

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    -----
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2011
  2. lsbbigdog

    lsbbigdog

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pretty cool setup. The biggest complaints I hear about 1911 is people are afraid to carry in cond 1 . Why I don't know but this might make those people more at easy carrying a 1911
     

  3. JohnJak

    JohnJak sadly spent

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Michigan
    Bill's system has been out for awhile. You will find that 1911 purest will resent this idea. I find it rather useful in todays world.
     
  4. drc767

    drc767 Navy CSAR

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Just something else to fail in that "fatal moment". If you are uncomfortable carrying C1 with a 1911, you probably shouldn't be carrying a 1911. And installing one of these to make somebody else feel more comfortable should they see my concealed carry 1911 with the hammer back is the least of my concerns. This is the equivalent of installing a manual safety on a Glock.....It is a "gimmick" product that, unfortunately, will probably have many customers.
     
  5. CMG

    CMG

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2001
    Messages:
    3,616
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    Don't Mess with Texas
    :agree:
     
  6. Ranger325

    Ranger325

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pineland
    Sorry, but I think solutions are for problems, and I don't see one here. First time I've been called a 'purest'....................

    Regards,
     
  7. lsbbigdog

    lsbbigdog

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree . If they are that concerned they should be carrying another weapon.
     
  8. Nakanokalronin

    Nakanokalronin JMB & MTK

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,916
    Likes Received:
    67
    Is there a problem with C'd & L'd? :dunno:............;)

    ETA: Just thought I'd mention a little tid bit long ago. I remember when I got my second handgun, a SA Mil-Spec 1911 and read of all the fears of C'd & L'd carry. I thought okay, I'll leave my 1911 with an empty chamber, cocked back with the safety off and carry it that way as much as I can and see if the hammer drops on its own. Well to make a long story short, the hammer never dropped. I would even purposely bang the holster into counter-tops and door ways to see if it could be jarred enough to "fire". Nothing ever happened.

    One thing I don't think some people realize is a commander hammer is actually protected by a beaver-tail from getting hit if the 1911 is dropped on it's back. Most of them are cupped inside the BT and almost all of them are shorter than the BT when cocked back.

    MY LGS has a BHP with the SFS system installed and I found it odd at best.

    In reality, its a mental thing. I've found plenty of people afraid of 1911 C'd and L'd carry that have no problem with a fully loaded/chambered Glock. I believe people associate the hammer of a 1911/BHP with the hammer of a revolver.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  9. fnfalman

    fnfalman Chicks Dig It

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2000
    Messages:
    51,997
    Likes Received:
    4,370
    Location:
    California & New Mexico, US
    Is this system similar to the FN or Daewoo system where the gun is on SA but the hammer is forward?
     
  10. polizei1

    polizei1 It WAS Quack

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    Ha, how dumb. Those who are afraid of an exposed hammer are just silly. Most of the time it's the same people who carry a glock or some other striker-fired gun with NO safety's at all, besides those "action safeties."
     
  11. lsbbigdog

    lsbbigdog

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like the ones that carry without one in the chamber even better.
     
  12. HotRoderX

    HotRoderX Gen4 BETATester

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont see how people can feel unsafe with a 1911 in condition 1. To me the only thing safer is a double action revolver.

    I don't see how people carry a Glock with one in the chamber. Sorry but I need a external safety I can snap on or off to feel comfortable with. When it comes to gun safety I want something I can physically feel. I don't want something that I hope works.
     
  13. faawrenchbndr

    faawrenchbndr DirtyThirty fan CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    36,379
    Likes Received:
    651
    Location:
    Troy
    Why the hell should I be concerned if someone sees my weapon with the hammer cocked?

    C&S makes some great parts,......these are just not for me.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  14. lsbbigdog

    lsbbigdog

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's mostly newbs that I hear these comments from. I think just the look of a cocked hammer makes them nervious . Once the understand the way the safety features work they seem more at eased .



    I always carry one in the chamber in my Glocks. The only way they go boom if you squeeze the trigger or shoot .40sw:whistling:

    I know thats been a debate for a while with LEO's . Some feel it's safe to have external safety if an assailant tries to unarm an officer and the perp not knowing about the safety feature can buy the cop time .Some argue they don't want to be hampered buy disengaging a safety if the weapon is drawn. I believe Massad Ayoob did an article on this in one of the magazines.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  15. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    105,744
    Likes Received:
    4,662
    Location:
    PA
    I agree with Dave 100%.
     
  16. rvrctyrngr

    rvrctyrngr Senior Moment

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Gator Nation
    I'll tell you all from experience that the SFS system is dangerous! I bought a pair of FN HiPowers that had it (couldn't pass up the deal).

    I took one through a defensive pistol class and found out that drawing at speed from the holster, it is possible to jam the mechanism in such a way that it locks up the entire gun. I had to manually re-cock the hammer to clear it. Once? Okay, a fluke. It happened a minimum of 5 times. I had to get another HiPower out of my bag to do the rest of the class.

    Sent the thing to Wayne and asked him to rebuild it completely. Now I have another great shooter that is actually my favorite HiPower. Kudos to Wayne.

    Stay away from the SFS (on a carry gun, any way).
     
  17. 40 0'Glock

    40 0'Glock

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    I'll stick with Cocked and Locked for 1911s, as intended. For hammer-down carry there are plenty of other excellent pistol options out there.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  18. tango44

    tango44

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,103
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Miami Florida
    That is not new I remember seen a Colt with that kit called triple action I guess!
     
  19. bladeandbarrel

    bladeandbarrel

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes, if you are pulling the trigger while dropping the safety I believe this dumb system goes **** up.
     
  20. rvrctyrngr

    rvrctyrngr Senior Moment

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Gator Nation
    That's pretty much what was happening. Pushing for speed, I was getting on the trigger before the system had fully re-cocked the hammer...it's not exactly an instantaneous process...and everything went Tango Uniform.

    Not an issue with a 'standard' configuration, obviously.