close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Win AA452 9mm load help

Discussion in 'Reloading' started by xtratoy, Oct 24, 2010.


  1. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    I have done a lot of searching and haven't been able to find any load info using Win AA452 and 9mm luger/Parabellum with 115gr. bullets. Found a list from an older Speer manual which lists a load for a 124 gr bullet. If anyone has any experience or info that they would share it would be most appreciated.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. dudel

    dudel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    4,573
    146
    Location:
    Texas Hill Country
    Burn rate has it at 24, with WST(20), HP38 (22) 231(26) and Green Dot (29).

    Other charts have it closer to HP38 than any other powder. I'll see if my Propellant Profiles book talks about it. It's not one I recall seeing used with 9mm.

    Burn rates are relative numbers, so that them with a grain of salt. I'd start with the lightest load available for GD and work up.
     

  3. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    You can use the 124 data with a 115 bullet, but not the other way around.
     
  4. dudel

    dudel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    4,573
    146
    Location:
    Texas Hill Country

    I can see why you're having problems finding a 9mm load - AA452 is a shotgun powder!

    When researching powders, my go-to book is "Propellant Profiles". It's a good source of information on all commercially available powders. There are many times when it will list pet loads for pistol using shotgun powders or rifle loads using pistol powders, etc.

    Not so in the case of AA452. It does however mention that Speer #11 lists 13 pistol rounds using AA452. That might be a good place to start. It mentioned 45ACP and 38spl (no mention of 9mm).

    Unless you've just got of ton of the stuff, I'd really suggest going out and getting a pound of a powder better suited to 9mm. There are many choices available. Your asking of the question tends to imply a newb status (apologies if this is not the case), as such, you don't want to be working up loads with a relatively fast powder, with little reference material and experience. This is a case were a chronograph would almost be required equipment (along with one of Jack's ex wifes).

    When makeing the powder selection, it might be useful to know if you are trying to build a plinking round, or a max power round and how you plan to meter the powder.

    Hope that helps,

    Don
     
  5. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,465
    815
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Dudel, come on, most pistol powders started life as shotgun powders.:dunno:
    WST was 452AA replacement back in the early 90s. So they are close but not identical. The loading data form the Speer #11 is very valid. As Whiskey notes, you can always load lighter bullets using heavier bullet data.
     
  6. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    If you read post #4 in this thread:

    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=29118

    The poster states that Phil Hodgdon says AA452 is the same as Hodgdon Trap 100. I would not go on this information alone, but would contact Hodgdon via email and see what they say.
     
  7. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
  8. dudel

    dudel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    4,573
    146
    Location:
    Texas Hill Country
    Fred, come on, I pointed out that there are powders that can be used both ways. :dunno:

    The reason the OP isn't finding many 9mm loadings is because 452AA is primarily a shotgun powder. Some shotgun powders work better than others in pistols.
     
    #8 dudel, Oct 24, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2010
  9. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    I have about 10 lbs of the powder. I found the list from Speer earlier and that is where I got the load for the 124 gr. bullet. Been reloading over 30 years and that is why I am asking and not just extrapolating based on burn rate of powder. just because the burn rate is similar doesn't mean the load density or charge weight will be equal. I do have a chronograph but I was trying to avoid the time involved in making a bunch of incremental loads and then driving an hour to shoot in the rain to see if one would work. I was just hoping someone had first hand knowledge of the powder with with a 9mm load. Here is what I found so I thought that someone might have some more info on the powder. Maybe i will just load up some 122 gr. lead FP bullets I have but I wanted to load up a thousand of the 115 gr. JHP I have.

    Winchester 452AA Loads from the Speer manual:

    Caliber Bullet Charge Vel.
    .32 S&W Long 90 Speer HBWC 1.6 674
    1.8 737
    .32 H&R Magnum 100 Speer Plinker 4.4 953
    4.9 990
    90 Speer HBWC 2.3 780
    2.5 811
    .32-20 WCF 100 Speer Plinker 7.3 1424
    8.1 1476
    110 Speer Varminter 6.8 1313
    7.4 1339
    110 Speer Spire Point, Round Nose 6.8 1246
    7.4 1295
    130 Speer HP, Flat Nose 6.4 1159
    7.1 1217
    .380 ACP 95 Speer TMJ 3.3 913
    3.7 1016
    9mm Parabellum 124 Speer TMJ 4.9 1064
    5.4 1142
    .38 Super 95 Speer TMJ 6.5 1316
    7.2 1336
    .38 S&W 110 Speer HP 3.0 796
    3.3 857
    125 Speer SP, HP 3.1 792
    3.4 844
    148 Speer BBWC 2.9 703
    Crimped in top lube groove 3.2 736
    .38 Special 148 Speer BBWC 2.8 772
    3.1 802
    148 Speer HBWC 2.8 743
    3.1 787
    158 Speer LSWC, LRN, LSWC HP 3.6 763
    4.0 842
    110 Speer HP 4.5 934
    +P 5.4 1072
    .357 Magnum 148 Speer HBWC 3.0 758
    3.3 812
    158 Speer LSWC, LSWC HP 5.0 960
    5.5 1004
    110 Speer HP 12.5 1434
    13.5 1488
    125 Speer SP, HP 10.5 1261
    11.5 1349
    .41 Magnum 220 Speer SP 8.3 1004
    9.3 1052
    .44 Mag. 240 Speer SP, HP, TMJ 12.5 1197
    13.5 1205
    .45 Auto Rim 200 Speer LSWC 3.5 665
    4.0 743
    .45 ACP 185 Speer TMJ Match 4.3 757
    4.7 819
    200 Speer TMJ Combat 5.0 841
    5.5 898
    200 Speer HP 5.0 868
    5.5 916
    230 Speer TMJ 4.7 760
    5.3 825
    260 Speer HP 4.6 712
    5.0 786
    Note: Per Handloader’s Digest 1994, 13th. Edition, Scot 453 “performs almost Identically to Winchester 452AA”
     
  10. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,465
    815
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Yes, you did, my point was in jest. Most powders we use today were sg powders way back when. Stick w/ the Speer #11 data or the op has some older Hogdon data. I shot #s of it in 45acp before it was discontinued. When I spoke to a Win rep at EndofTrail in 1990, he told me WST was it's replacement & loading data I use today is pretty close to what I used for 452AA back then.:dunno:
     
  11. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Something being a replacement means it has the same use, but not that it uses the same data. The F14 replaced the F4, but it's not the same thing. I just don't want anyone to think it's a given that they use the same data.
     
  12. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,465
    815
    Location:
    so.cal.
    You are correct, it's why I said the data is close, but not identical.
     
  13. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    Put together some loads at 5.0 gr.AA452 and 115 gr FMJ. shot over the chrony and they were pretty mild. Avg 1050 fps with ejection just barely getting out of the gun. I will try 5.5 grs. next time I have a chance. Shot out of my Glock 35. It has a LoneWolf 40-9 conversion barrel in it.
     
  14. dudel

    dudel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    4,573
    146
    Location:
    Texas Hill Country
    Congrats. Sounds like you are well on your way. 10 pounds is too much to toss. Glad you could find a use for it.
     
  15. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Pressure wise, that 5.0 might just be about the top. I would try less than 5.5 for my next step. A 10% increase in powder charge results in a 20% increase in pressure. 20% is a big jump. The sluggish ejection doesn't necessarily mean you are at less than max pressure. You're using a light bullet with a slide made for 40SW which is a bit heavier than the 9mm slide.


    It's up to you, obviously, but I would either be happy with brass I don't have to chase, or try 5.2 grains.
     
  16. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,465
    815
    Location:
    so.cal.
    It's not that slow a powder. Bumping to 5.5gr is not working up a load. Try 0.1gr increments, 10rds at a time.:whistling: Your result is pretty much what I get from WST. At 5.5gr, you are running the edge of max for sure.
     
    #16 fredj338, Oct 25, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2010
  17. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    OK, I'll take it in smaller steps.
     
  18. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    I worked up to 5.5 of AA452 and was getting 1125 FPS and decent ejection (2 foot) to my right. No pressure signs yet. I never mentioned that I have a 13 lb. Lone Wolf recoil spring in the gun. I am going to try 5.6, 5.7 and 5.8 gr. Just looking to get load around 1150 and call it good if get decent groups with it. I have been using CCI small pistol primers. Its raining now and I have no idea when I will get a chance to try these next loads out. I sat in the truck for over two hours waiting for the rain to just slack off from a rainstorm to light rain to check out the last loads :crying:.
     
  19. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,465
    815
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Go slow, 452AA will get funny on the top end. You'll see no appreciable vel gain by adding powder, that platue says it's time to stop.
     
  20. xtratoy

    xtratoy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    71
    6
    are you saying that 1125 fps is the best that can be expected out of this powder? Not arguing as it may well be, but what are you basing this on? I have been looking at my reloading manuals and at hodgdon.com and I admit I don't understand how a bullet and powder combo can produce higher pressure yet slower speeds than the same bullet with a different powder. I just figured that if Winchester white box 115 FMJ is throwing brass further and showing flatter primers I was still good for a tenth of a grain or two. BUT...... I've been wrong before:faint: I'm always ready to listen to someone who may talk me out of doing something dumb.