close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Wilson Combat not selling to anti-gun states

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by Jim1970, Feb 28, 2013.

  1. Jim1970

    Jim1970 Learnin'

    508
    7
    Jan 2, 2005
    Wyoming
  2. DustyJacket

    DustyJacket Directiv 10-289

    6,642
    296
    Oct 16, 2008
    Missouri, East of KC
    A little less impressive.
    How many state agencies pay WC high prices?
     

  3. SpringerTGO

    SpringerTGO

    2,831
    378
    Jul 30, 2011
    Would you prefer Wilson continues doing business as usual with those states?
    At least they are taking a stand, unlike some other manufacturers.
     
  4. I am glad to see this. The more the better!
     
  5. PEC-Memphis

    PEC-Memphis Scottish Member

    5,390
    1,042
    Oct 19, 2006
    Doh ?
    Its not going to make much difference until Glock, S&W, Colt and (maybe) Springfield do the same.

    Will Hi-Point, Davis and Jennings be the major suppliers to local, state and federal LE then?
     
  6. glock2740

    glock2740 Gun lover.

    18,888
    14
    Jun 19, 2008
    NW Ark.
    Glock, Sig, S&W, HK, Springfield and Colt could make some real noise. I hope they do. I would LOVE to see Glock tell the NYPD to take a hike. And when gloomberg turned to another company, be given the finger and told wear to go stick it.
     
  7. MD357

    MD357

    4,125
    12
    Jul 13, 2008
    In a perfect world...... but.... it ain't gonna happen.
     
  8. RetailNinja

    RetailNinja

    1,229
    3
    Jan 31, 2007
    Tuktoyaktuk
    I got banned from Coptalk for posting this same thing, albeit in a rather snarky fashion :rofl:
     
  9. DustyJacket

    DustyJacket Directiv 10-289

    6,642
    296
    Oct 16, 2008
    Missouri, East of KC
    That is my point - WC produces high-cost semi-custom firearms.

    State and local agencied won't buy a $3,000 handgun when they can get $500 Glocks.

    Same idea on shotguns and rifles.

    Therefore, if is really an empty gesture - the only people affected are civilian shooters.
     
  10. SpringerTGO

    SpringerTGO

    2,831
    378
    Jul 30, 2011
    Wilson sells rifles, magazines, and other parts and accessories. But if Wilson only sold cleaning patches, maybe other cleaning patch manufactures would join in.

    What if Taxi companies refused to drive if their drivers couldn't carry? Not that they do carry, but the point is, the more companies that jump on this the better. We need conventions to look elsewhere, and whatever industry is willing to speak out to do so.
    It's appalling that Kimber has been silent through all this. If you are reading this Kimber, move your company to a pro 2a state.

    I certainly wouldn't bash any company by calling their actions "empty gestures".
     
  11. okie

    okie GT Mayor

    64,670
    1,533
    Oct 28, 2001
    Muskogee Ok.
    This:supergrin:
     
  12. bac1023

    bac1023

    104,080
    3,509
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    That would be cool for sure, Joe :cool:
     
  13. AK74play

    AK74play

    1,604
    3
    Jun 26, 2010
    Indiana
    I got an e-mail from Wilson Combat and the list at that time was up to 76 different suppliers and manufacturere and growing every day. This is a GOOD thing for the 2nd Ammendment. A few of them are.
    Larue Tactical
    Olympic Arms
    Cheaper than Dirt
    Spikes Tactical
    Barret Firearms Bravo Company
    Stoner Arms

    And this is just a few. These are big name companies and as this trend continues we will all become stronger in the anti gun war.
     
  14. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    10,280
    23
    Jun 13, 2005
    Tejas
    :upeyes:

    Always one in the crowd who has to find a negative in everything.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2013
  15. This news has created quite the debate on a different section amongst its LEO posters. I've stayed out on that one...

    As a LEO I understand the concern some have with firearms companies "punishing" street cops who have no control over what laws are passed by their state governments. I, however, can only commend companies like Wilson Combat and Magpul for taking a stand and putting their money where their mouth is.

    I can only think God I live and work where I do. I'm contrast to many states, we've got quite a few pro-gun bills making their way thorough the legislature right now.


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2013
  16. FloorPoor

    FloorPoor

    132
    3
    Jan 27, 2013
    Yep, now that would be impressive, but LEA's being a HUGE percentage of their business, it's probably NOT going to happen.
     
  17. RetailNinja

    RetailNinja

    1,229
    3
    Jan 31, 2007
    Tuktoyaktuk
    I take it I'm not the only person that RussP banned?:wavey:

     
  18. bill4282

    bill4282

    81
    0
    Jul 9, 2009
    Same old tired thing "Company puts the almighty dollar ahead of principles and moral obligation to support their customer base" If the bans go through and The Big Dogs stay silent, last Glock or Kimber I'll ever buy. At leastWilson had the guts to publicly state their position. Guess we all know what The Big Dogs are.
     
  19. droptrd

    droptrd

    64
    2
    Aug 22, 2012
    Illinois
    Good for WC. I hope more follow suit