Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Ruble Noon, Jul 24, 2012.
what if....one or more homeboys were packing heat? could it be why the shooter gave up?
Forget "20%". All it would maybe have taken was ONE. But the law abiding honor "gun free zones". And get slaughtered.
He would have gone to a "gun free zone". A Church or a School, perhaps.
LTC Dave Grossman had something to say about that in the second hour of Armed American Radio.
The only issue I see is the less accurate and cross fire. Though, I think it would have been an amusing outcome if the guy dramatically popped out to commit this act and the majority of the theater opened up on him instead before he got a shot off.
Kind of like trying to rob a cop bar.
This little s**t would have soiled his groin protection if he suddenly found himself on a two way gun range.
Not sure it would of made much of a difference. This D bag had a rifle, body armor, and surprise on his side. Sure I would like to think at least one or more armed person(s) could have made a impact, but doubtful given the circumstances, don't think the outcome would of been better or worse.
This asshat is not a crazy person IMO, he planned this and was prepared, hard to stop a lone gunmen like this.
If the killer would have been stopped by an armed citizen, the media would have dropped the entire story within hours.
i believe someone would have taken him out, body armor or not you still feel the impact plus the sound and sight of returning fire may have disrupted him
There is no way crossfire, or poorly aimed fire, from armed citizens, or police, or even gangbangers, could have caused anywhere near the death and trauma, caused by letting one shooter shoot anyone he wanted to, for as long as he wanted to.
Even with body armor, getting shot hurts. It would have probably led to a distraction that may have had him miss some opportunities to shoot unarmed people fleeing, and maybe encouraged him to flee.
We'll never know for sure.
I think I'll keep going armed to movies, like I have for many years.
In this era of Travon vs Zimmerman, that one guy illegally carrying a gun would have a serious decision to make regarding his own personal survival and freedom.
It probably took too many seconds to realize that it was not a SWAT cop, not a Batman promotion, not a joke, and a real threat.
Not everyone is willing to sacrifice everything for a room full of probable liberal sheeple. I hate to admit this, but I hope I'm never asked to be a hero for a bunch of random strangers.
We can speculate till were blue in the face But fimly beleive that causaultys would have been less ! Out of respect for the familys that lost loved ones,I WILL NOT repeat this persons name !
Looks like the best bet is to not patronize businesses that declare themselves as gun free zones. Pretty sure even here where guns are allowed in theaters, most won't be carrying. I don't go to movies alone, so my default position is to always shoot back, but that could change depending on the circumstances at the time.
If the only theater in your community has a no guns policy, consider waiting until movies come out on blue ray, and watch them at home. Inform the theater about why you will not spend money there.
Remember, the crime came off *his* initiative, and his planning was pretty careful, no matter how crazy. The guy who surrendered like a ***** wasn't going to pick a hard target.
I have given this card out along with an informative conversation, with some success.
Exactly! This is why just the possibility that someone might fight back would have quite possibly made him (and other cowards that commit these types of crimes) re-think his actions. Of course he might have just chosen another gun free zone as the target.
Just a bunch of maybes. I wish the mover goers were armed. But they weren't, and even if some of them were armed, it's still a big maybe on whether it would of made a difference.
I'm just taking a wild guess here, not to many people(myself included) are prepared to react or even know how to act in that type of situation. Smoke/tear gas bombs, full body armor, rifle, surprise on the shooters side in a crowded, loud, and dark movie theater, hard nut to crack.
Seeking cover and protecting your own would be the best option IMO. If you are armed and had a chance at a shot, by all means. Considering the circumstances though, luck would have to be on your side.
Regards to the bold, amen.
I don't feel right without my g31, and only go to a few places where carrying is prohibited.
I want one of those, pass it around the places I would like to visit and carry at the same time.