close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Went to buy a Nano, came home with a 27

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by atyszka, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    So, I went to the LGS to look at and buy the Beretta Nano. I've been wanting a high-quality carry gun. My Kel-Tec PF9 broke an ejector for no apparent reason. They had the Nano on sale for $399. Seems like a very nice gun, comfortable, smooth (but long) trigger, well made, nice and smooth with nothing external to snag. I compared it to a Glock 27 to see how much smaller it was. It was quite a bit (maybe 3/4") less in OAL, about the exact same height, and the width was visibly less than the 27, but still pretty close.

    When I asked to see how it compared to the Glock, the guy kinda said what I knew deep down, "it's nice, but it's no Glock".

    So after about 60 seconds of deliberation I went with a used Gen4 27 that they had. Aside from needing a thorough cleaning (which it got as soon as I got home), it looked practically brand new.

    So that now makes 5 Glocks in the collection. I'll make it to the club this week and run a couple hundred through it.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012
  2. rilkil23

    rilkil23

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    60 miles south of Denver.
    I haven't carried my Ruger LC9 since I bought a used G26 a few weeks ago. Congratulations to you.
     

  3. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    105,668
    Likes Received:
    4,613
    Location:
    PA
    Congrats on the G27.
     
  4. lyodbraun

    lyodbraun

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Congrats on the new G27, so much better than that Nano... you made a wise choice....
     
  5. SJ 40

    SJ 40

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    14,830
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Location:
    Vermont
    Congrats ! I think you made the better choice. SJ 40
     
  6. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Agree fully with that. As bad as I am with spending $ on guns, I would have had the 27 sooner or later anyway, since I wanted one regardless, so sooner is better.
     
  7. snowbird.40

    snowbird.40

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    703
    Likes Received:
    98
    Location:
    North coast and the desert
    Good move. My son was letting me know about the M&P Shield this spring (before I even knew they existed), so I took a look at the specs and saw it weighed exactly .75 ounce less than a G26. I just so happened to be in the market for my LAST handgun --- one that I can carry effectively, use for home defense, and shoot in competition with quicker double taps (the ONLY reason I wound up with a Gen 4 Model 26 instead of my old trusty G27).

    You will probably find yourself carrying the G27 more than your other guns, maybe even your other Glock, although you don't mention which models you have.
     
  8. PrecisionRifleman

    PrecisionRifleman

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    5
    Congrats!! Put some Trijicon's on that thing and you are set! :D
     
  9. Glk30

    Glk30

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2012
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    1
    I am a big fan of the 27.. Have one on my side as I type this now. I'd take 10 rounds of .40 over 7 rounds of 9mm any day any time... Good choice, cause at the end of the day it isn't a Glock.

    For the 27 I recommend GAP mag plates and a good holster... I like OWB.
     
  10. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    This is my stable.

    Gen4 35, Unlimited/Open, Lone Wolf barrel, Jager comp, Jager guide rod with 15# spring, Burris FastFire III, Zev fulcrum trigger and striker, Zev springs, SJC magwell, Tru-Grip, few dress-up parts.

    Gen4 35, GSSF legal, 3.5# connector, a couple trimmed springs, Warren/Sevingy sights, and Tru-Grip. (SWSA resetting trigger in at moment).

    Gen2 22, GSSF legal, 3.5# connector, a couple trimmed springs, Warren/Sevingy sights, and Tru-Grip.

    Gen2 19, stock.

    Gen4 27, 24 hours old, polished stock trigger components, smooth Gen4 trigger bar. Trijicons and a couple more mags with Pearce extensions on order.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. donovan655

    donovan655

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    lmao. I went to my lgs to look at the nano and the shield. Went home with a gen 3 g23. totally and completely unimpressed with the nano. I had money burning a hole in my pocket too.
     
  12. fuzzy03cls

    fuzzy03cls

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Florida
    If the nano comes out in .40 I'll buy it.
     
  13. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    .40 might have made a difference for me too. But then will it give up one more round in the mag? 5+1 would be a tough sell for me, I ruled out the XD(S) for that reason.
     
  14. GPBob

    GPBob

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0

    When you say smooth Gen4 trigger bar, what do you mean?
     
  15. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    The trigger face on the compacts and sub-compacts have serrations, something to do with US import laws. The full size models have a "smooth" trigger face. So I took a Gen4 trigger bar assembly from my 35 and dropped it in, after polishing. I prefer the smooth trigger face.
     
  16. Roering

    Roering Sorting nuts

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,241
    Likes Received:
    151
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    I have a G23 currently and find it great albeit a little on the large side for concealed carry. If I find myself in the market for something smaller to better fit the bill I'd probably go with a Kahr PM9 over a G26 because it is slimmer but finding one to give a test drive will be difficult.
     
  17. scccdoc

    scccdoc

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    1
    Love my 27, however, there is a noticeable difference in weight compared to the 9.
     
  18. SFla27

    SFla27

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South Florida, USA

    ^^^This, this, this....and this.^^^

    For those of us who do not possess the skills of the great Hickok45, a GAP mag floorplate does noticeably-improve controllability.

    Overall value is high, even for a 26, but more so for a 27.

    Enjoy.
     
  19. Glock40man

    Glock40man

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    7,058
    Likes Received:
    164
    Location:
    The Midwest
  20. atyszka

    atyszka

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Was looking on Glockparts.com and I don't see anything specific to GAP, looks like the same floorplate (part # SP03206) is used for 9, 40, 357 and GAP.

    I have 2 Pearce extensions on the way for the pinky rest. Shot 300 rounds today and it was controllable, although by the end the inside of my palm was a little raw.