Welcome to the greatest muscle car era

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Kichigai, Jun 26, 2013.

  1. Yes, its the new muscle era

    0 vote(s)
  2. No, only the originals are true muscle cars.

    0 vote(s)
  1. Kichigai

    Kichigai 気違い Was Mr30s

    What do you think? Is now the greatest muscle car era? Some of the new cars are putting up big HP numbers and speed that make the old muscle cars look much slower. Don't get me wrong, I love old american muscle and restored a 67 RS/SS camaro big block but it is hard to ignore the numbers and performance.


    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Hands down the best cars are made today. Just the refinements in handling make a difference. My wife has a 66 mustang. It is a great car but after a day of hard driving I an worn out. It is fatiguing to drive the older cars compared to the new ones.

  3. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock Scouts Out

    My every day driver is a Hemi Charger. Yeah, I'm liking this throw back stuff.
  4. I agree. Not only can you get high HP straight from dealership, but mpg is up as well.
  5. Kichigai

    Kichigai 気違い Was Mr30s

    This is true and FAR higher reliability
  6. It is hard to debate the numbers of today (thanks to technology not available previously). I do love the current Camaro (I talk myself out of buying one at least once every two weeks) but I still gravitate to the older muscle cars. I just think they look so damn cool.
  7. the main problem with today's musclecars is cost! Yeah, NEW musclecars were relatively expensive back in the old days but a 2 to 3 year old car was certainly cheap enough and you could work on them yourself.
    Today's musclecars are certainly better in almost every way compared to the original musclecars of the past but how many do you see in teenage of early '20 year old hands with someone "souping" them up in their driveway?

    To Herrglock: If you drive one of those new 4-DOOR cars Dodge foolishly calls a "Charger" , It ain't a Charger! Chargers were only made with 2 doors! Here is a REAL Hemicharger!


  8. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock Scouts Out

    How silly of me. It had a Dodge sticker price on it, says Hemi on the engine, has Charger markings on it. You're right, I'm sure it's a Pinto.

    I had a '71 Duster and yeah, I'm old enough that kids my age had the late '60s/early '70s cars in HS and college. I like my current Charger better than pretty much any pony or muscle car I grew up with.
    #8 HerrGlock, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013
  9. M&P15T

    M&P15T Beard One

    Current muscle cars are even easier to work on.

    Long-tube headers, performance cats, axle-back exhaust, X and H pipes, intake/CAI systems, are all very easy to install. If I added a super-charger and up-graded fuel injectors (or any other combo of performance up-grades), tuning the engine is simply a matter of having Bamatunes e-mail me the proper tune, and me loading it into the car.

    Hell, I could have one of 9 different tunes on my car in 10 or so minutes from now.

    Then there are all of the suspension, wheel & tire, and brake system up-grades, plus the usual LSDs and drive-shafts and such.

    And sorry to say, but 20 somethings are not anymore likely to have a real muscle car now, than they were back in the 1960s. It's not a question of age, but money.

    Modern cars are actually very easy to work on. The death of the carb has been a blessing, with tuning a car to run correctly with after-market up-grades a simple matter of a down-load.
    #9 M&P15T, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013
  10. Kichigai

    Kichigai 気違い Was Mr30s

    I am with you
  11. Actually, performance is cheaper now than "back in the day".

    1968 Hemi Charger sticker was $4,821. That's $32,271 in 2013 dollars. Easy to beat the Charger in every category for that price today.

    And you'll have a faster car that handles so much better, is so much safer, more reliable, easier to repair, holds value better, etc.

    But I also like the vibe of the '60s vehicles. You look at something that was built with all the structural integrity and attention to detail of a food truck burrito, and people drove 'em like they were rockets!!!
    #11 Cashgap, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013
  12. Bill Powell

    Bill Powell Cross Member

    Oh, I don't know. I bought a 68 Dodge Dart 340 six pack and 4 speed, It would run right at 12 flat in the quarter in the mid teens. The front end was loose so it cornered kind of twitchy. I paid 175 dollars for it.
  13. Kichigai

    Kichigai 気違い Was Mr30s

    I should have made this a poll so that people could vote on old vs new muscle car :brickwall:
  14. M&P15T

    M&P15T Beard One

    Please share the details of the rear suspension, rear end gearing, wheels and tires, and transmission.

    Plus, whatever was done to the engine, and power out-put.

    I ask because, stock, 1968 340 Darts were 15.2 second 1/4 mile cars. So, unless the car you're speaking of had some serious power and traction improvements, the 1/4 mile times you've quoted are incorrect.

    Hell, the 440 GTSs only did 13.3 second 1/4 mile times.
    #14 M&P15T, Jun 26, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2013
  15. You forgot to consider... Memory drops about .1 sec ET and adds about a MPH to top end every year, in my experience.
  16. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1 Federal Member

    :bowdown: __ :thumbsup:
  17. :rofl::rofl::rofl:

    What I have seen is slightly different.

    When waiting in line getting into the drag strip (i.e. before gates open) there are so many 10 second cars its shocking. The gates must be magical. Simply passing through them makes cars somewhere between 5 and 7 slower. I am not sure what causes, this, but my intuition is that the gates must have some sort of EMI that affects the tuning on the cars and damages the gasoline. Otherwise, I just can't figure out how a 10 second car only runs a 17 a few hundred feet later?
  18. ilgunguygt

    ilgunguygt Enslaved in IL

    Too bad average joe can barely afford one, or in many cases cant. In 1970 when the Chevrolet beast was the LS6 chevelle it was about a 3600 dollar car. Minimum wage was about 1.60 an hour then. Thats 2250 hours of work to pay for the car. Nowadays Minimum wage is 7.25 an hour and the cost of the top performing camaro is well above 40k. Your 7.25 wage when applied to the previous 2250 hours required to pay for the chevelle comes up to less than 17k.

    Yes, the cars are faster but the average joe that used to buy them cant afford to anymore.
  19. The new "muscle cars" are nice, but the real ones had big blocks.
  20. M&P15T

    M&P15T Beard One

    You mean "original ones".....

Share This Page