Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

*Video* Off-Duty Miami Cop Busted Doing 120mph In Marked Cruiser!

Discussion in 'Cop Talk' started by ULVER, Oct 29, 2011.

  1. ULVER

    ULVER Dixie Rebel

    Jan 8, 2001
    ATL., GA. USA
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2011
  2. use2b6L32


    Apr 26, 2006

  3. South Fla

    South Fla ©South Fla 2015

    Oct 10, 2006

    As far as pulling over a marked cruiser, how did she know that it was not stolen when it would not pull over? It might not have been reported as stolen as of yet.

    Yes, and at gunpoint until she could verify it was an actual law enforcement officer. a supervisor.

    Looks like some of you West Coasters have a few things to learn.
  4. I concur! The gal had no way of knowing that the car wasn't stolen or if the possible cop driving it had become unhindged. They are human too and have issues to deal with like everyone else. (Like no cop has ever committed suicide.) IF he was legit in running as he was, there's the radio to relay his intentions. She was 100% Right On in protecting the public against the reckless driver and then protecting herself against the unknown occupant. The vehicle occupant may have immediate access to numerous loaded weapons. I'd back her actions 100%! I wonder if she called for back-up. I certainly would have.

    My county had an incident several years ago where a private auto repair shop mechanic was "road testing" a "repair" he made by speeding down county roads. He too was stopped and jailed. His answer was he did it because he could. The repair was an oil change and lube. :faint:
  5. Palmguy

    Palmguy Boom.

    Oct 29, 2006
    NW FL
  6. JTipper.45


    Nov 14, 2004
    She did her job and as a supervisor I would have expected no less. The only thing I would have gotten on to her about is approaching the car without a cover unit. There was no way to tell what the situation was and who was in that unit. As far as the off duty officer, I can't say I have never been away from home and had a personal emergency that I had to get back in a hurry. However, 120 is way too fast and by looking at the video it appears to be raining or misting. That is just crazy. If he did have a legit reason, as SOON as the lights came on he should have hit the shoulder if anything not to put another officer in danger having to chase his butt down.
  7. PinkoCommie

    PinkoCommie Unusual Member

    Sometimes, we are our own worst enemies.


    The only thing that sucks is that the asswipe put another law enforcement officer in an uncomfortable (and dangerous -- 120mph is always dangerous) situation. Entitled *******. The badge gives you the right to do a lot of things. If you want to clown around, though, change into civvies and do it in your own car.
  8. RVER


    Aug 3, 2004
  9. captcurly


    Sep 14, 2008
    Southern Delaware
    The Miami officer is a jerk and should be terminated from the force. I would like to see his personnel folder. I was on the job for 30 years and this yo yo has not defense for his actions. This jo mo was doing over 120 MPH and he deserves whatever he gets.
  10. IndyGunFreak


    Jan 26, 2001
    That happened here in Indiana... about 5-6yrs ago I believe (maybe longer).

    Trooper pulled over a city K-9 Officer for driving over 100mph down the highway, then the city officer resisted the Trooper, and the trooper had to use force to restrain him.

    It was pretty big in the news, and he got some disciplinary action, etc. (edit: the city officer did)

    The irony of it all, is the Trooper that made the stop/arrest, was accidentally bitten by a city K-9 during a foot pursuit about a year later. Scuttlebutt was it was intentional, but he seemed to admit he didn't hear(when numerous other officers out there did) the K-9 officer ordering guys to stay back because he was releasing his dog.

    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  11. fespo276


    Mar 31, 2007
    Sorry, but who is she to pull over another MARKED unit. How does she know he is not going to a call? What if he was a SWAT operator going to a call out? Then, once the car stopped she HANDCUFFS a uniformed police officer for a motor vehicle violation? Give me a break.
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  12. Pepper45


    Jun 15, 2006
    Only he wasn't going to a call. Simple radio traffic can verify that. SWAT officers are selected for their superior skills at many different things, but most important, is their decision making skills. No SWAT officer worth a damn is going to be doing 120+ on a crowded highway without lights and siren. Handcuffing a uniformed police officer isn't out of line, not for a violation, but for a crime. In my state he'd be charged with a felony, and rightly so.

    The trooper screwed up. She shouldn't have gone halfway with this. But then again, she shouldn't have been put in that position by some idiot running that speed to an off-duty gig 20 miles outside of his jurisdiction, putting the safety of the public at risk because of his stupidity.

    Look at it this way, if he'd pulled over right away, they'd have had a "whose badge is bigger" contest, and this would have been a much different story, one that I really wouldn't care about. But the moment that he decided he didn't have to yield to emergency lights and siren, and was going to continue at a high rate of speed, accelerate and attempt to elude the trooper, all bets for treating him like a "fellow officer" went right out the window. He did that, not her. Yield right away, and we'll deal with it on the side of the highway. I may call you a retard, I may tell you what I really think of you, but the side of the highway is where things stop if you don't force me to talk to your supervisor. Don't yield, force me to chase you for several minutes at 120+? You're going to jail, and it's you that made the decision for me.
  13. fespo276


    Mar 31, 2007
    Should the speeding cop just have pulled over? Sure, I agree. However, I just don't think she should have attempted the stop in the first place. We are going to just have to disagree there. If she really wanted to make something of it, get the plate and complain to the "powers that be" at the speeding cop's department.

    But, sorry, I don't care how its classified, it ain't a "crime" worthy of pointing a gun at another uniformed cop and handcuffing him. A crime is an abused kid, a robbery victim, a beat up spouse, a murder victim. Seen plenty of those, and I am sure you have, too. Something tells me, however, she has not.
  14. Pepper45


    Jun 15, 2006
    I agree, but eluding is a felony here. If I turn on my lights, and the violator doesn't stop, they turned a traffic ticket into a felony arrest. I don't know what FHP policy is, but my department's policy is that if I am going to charge someone with a felony, I am to secure them in handcuffs, and at a minimum, transport them to my office. There, the issue may be referred to the DA's office, or they may be lodged on a probable cause affidavit. But I'm required to take them into custody, and that means putting them in handcuffs.

    If I was forced to do what she did, cuff a uniformed cop, he wouldn't be uniformed long. I'd peel off his shirt/vest/belt/etc, because there is no reason he needs to be ID'd as LE when around scumbags in custody. Maybe referring the case to the DA would be enough, and he could be released. But he endangered the lives of everyone on that road. Sure, he's a good driver. Sure, we all are. But his decision making skills SUCK. Even given his attitude, he knew what he was doing was wrong. He knew he was doing it with an "I'm above the law I enforce" attitude.

    I say again, this would have turned out much differently if he'd pulled over right away. It could have been handled on the side of the road, or with the guy's supervisor, and not gotten into a pissing match once the MPD guy was id'd. Running put him right in line with the kinds of people that you and I arrest on a daily basis. I can't make excuses for someone like that. It sucks that he put his family in that position, but it sucks equally for the family of the cop that is really dirty, or doing other criminal things. He dishonored the badge by his actions, and needs to be held accountable for them. If he escapes a felony, or even skates on the criminal charge completely, he doesn't need to be in this career field.
  15. Hrsuhd


    Mar 26, 2008
    Oregons Bay Area
  16. eaglefrq

    eaglefrq NRA Member

    Oct 4, 2009
    The Twilight Zone
    You are what is wrong with the select few police who feel they are above the law. It doesn't matter whether the off duty was right or wrong, you will defend him, because he is a cop.

    If that had been a "civilian" speeding at 120mph, she would have been justified in your eyes, but since it was a cop, then let him drive recklessly and complain through the chain of command.

    The off duty cop is a criminal. At a minimum, he is guilty of reckless driving and eluding.

    I'm willing to bet you roll through stop signs and speed while in your cruiser, because apparently you are there to enforce the law, but not follow it.

    Law enforcement should be held to a higher standard. If they can't obey the law, then they have no business enforcing the law.
  17. jenrick


    May 8, 2005
    Central Texas
    State law of course differs, so I'm not getting into that discussion.

    What if he had been responding to a call in a "silent code 3" response? It's in our official policy I can drive like a bat out of hell without my lights and sirens if need be. Not saying the dude wasn't an idiot for driving that fast, not saying he doesn't deserve to get canned for doing it, but I also think the trooper took care of business the wrong way as well.

  18. fespo276


    Mar 31, 2007
    This will be my last comment.

    I am NOT defending the speeding cop. Speeding is wrong and dangerous, and might properly be addressed through enforcement action. Failing to stop may, in fact, be criminal. No excuse.

    However, there could have been many legitimate, legal, and "law enforcement related" reasons to explain why he was driving like that: SWAT call out, silent code 3 response to crime in progress, actual code 3 response in which he thought driving with his lights off would be safer/faster, etc., etc.

    My only point is that her INITIAL reaction, to pull him over and assume the worst, could have interfered with that response. I think a uniformed officer in a marked police car should be given the benefit of the doubt and be allowed to proceed unencumbered. Following up later through his chain of command would have served to address the issue, without running the risk of interfering with a potentially legitimate law enforcement function.

    Again, my only point.

    Oh, and I am not what is "wrong" with law enforcement. I have sacrificed more than I care to think about, or explain to you, to be a police officer. I'm the guy who handles every call to full completion (and then some), never takes a meal break while at work, almost never calls out sick, backs up my fellow officers, would never even think of breaking the law, and volunteers my on free time to better my department. I am honest, dedicated, and professional and, after more than a decade in law enforcement, am growing more and more tired of defending myself to an ungrateful citizenry.
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  19. GPalmer

    GPalmer CLM

    May 20, 2006
    Same in Florida, say hi to a second degree felony.

    316.1935 Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer; aggravated fleeing or eluding.—
    (1) It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he or she has been ordered to stop such vehicle by a duly authorized law enforcement officer, willfully to refuse or fail to stop the vehicle in compliance with such order or, having stopped in knowing compliance with such order, willfully to flee in an attempt to elude the officer, and a person who violates this subsection commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
    (2) Any person who willfully flees or attempts to elude a law enforcement officer in an authorized law enforcement patrol vehicle, with agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle, with siren and lights activated commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
    (3) Any person who willfully flees or attempts to elude a law enforcement officer in an authorized law enforcement patrol vehicle, with agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle, with siren and lights activated, and during the course of the fleeing or attempted eluding:
    (a) Drives at high speed, or in any manner which demonstrates a wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.