close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Use of Force 101

Discussion in 'Cop Talk' started by TBO, Oct 7, 2008.

  1. Wow, i did not know that.......interesting.:steamed:
     
  2. TBO.....you always post the coolest stuff!! thanks again!!
     

    TBO likes this.

  3. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Lifetime Member

    14,820
    2,147
    May 4, 2003
    TBO likes this.
  4. TBO

    TBO Why so serious? CLM

    MN's differences on Use of Force/Deadly Force between Peace Officers and non-Peace Officers:

    Items in red are Peace Officer only.
    Non-Peace Officer specific language in green.
    --------------------------

    609.06 AUTHORIZED USE OF FORCE.

    Subdivision 1.When authorized.

    Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 2, reasonable force may be used upon or toward the person of another without the other's consent when the following circumstances exist or the actor reasonably believes them to exist:
    (1) when used by a public officer or one assisting a public officer under the public officer's direction:
    (a) in effecting a lawful arrest; or
    (b) in the execution of legal process; or
    (c) in enforcing an order of the court; or
    (d) in executing any other duty imposed upon the public officer by law; or
    (2) when used by a person not a public officer in arresting another in the cases and in the manner provided by law and delivering the other to an officer competent to receive the other into custody; or
    (3) when used by any person in resisting or aiding another to resist an offense against the person; or
    (4) when used by any person in lawful possession of real or personal property, or by another assisting the person in lawful possession, in resisting a trespass upon or other unlawful interference with such property; or
    (5)when used by any person to prevent the escape, or to retake following the escape, of a person lawfully held on a charge or conviction of a crime; or
    (6) when used by a parent, guardian, teacher, or other lawful custodian of a child or pupil, in the exercise of lawful authority, to restrain or correct such child or pupil; or
    (7) when used by a school employee or school bus driver, in the exercise of lawful authority, to restrain a child or pupil, or to prevent bodily harm or death to another; or
    (8) when used by a common carrier in expelling a passenger who refuses to obey a lawful requirement for the conduct of passengers and reasonable care is exercised with regard to the passenger's personal safety; or
    (9) when used to restrain a person who is mentally ill or mentally defective from self-injury or injury to another or when used by one with authority to do so to compel compliance with reasonable requirements for the person's control, conduct, or treatment; or
    (10) when used by a public or private institution providing custody or treatment against one lawfully committed to it to compel compliance with reasonable requirements for the control, conduct, or treatment of the committed person.

    Subd. 2.Deadly force used against peace officers.

    Deadly force may not be used against peace officers who have announced their presence and are performing official duties at a location where a person is committing a crime or an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult.
    --------------------------------------------------------


    As you can see above, there are significant differences (as you'd expect) in the language of the law on how/when Peace Officers can use Force against a person, and what/when non-Peace Officers can use force against a person.


    Now we'll look at the difference between "Deadly Force" for Cops/non-Cops.
    First, for the non-Cop:


    609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE.

    The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.

    ---------------


    One very interesting niche topic of the above is "abode". MN doesn't have much case law defining what exactly an abode is. What there is suggests it's your primary place of living, meaning actual home. Cabin doesn't count, motor-home in transport doesn't count, etc. Fascinating area of law yet to be explored (tested) in MN courts.


    Now for the difference in Deadly Force law/powers for Cops:


    609.066 AUTHORIZED USE OF DEADLY FORCE BY PEACE OFFICERS.

    Subdivision 1.Deadly force defined.

    For the purposes of this section, "deadly force" means force which the actor uses with the purpose of causing, or which the actor should reasonably know creates a substantial risk of causing, death or great bodily harm. The intentional discharge of a firearm, other than a firearm loaded with less lethal munitions and used by a peace officer within the scope of official duties, in the direction of another person, or at a vehicle in which another person is believed to be, constitutes deadly force. "Less lethal munitions" means projectiles which are designed to stun, temporarily incapacitate, or cause temporary discomfort to a person. "Peace officer" has the meaning given in section 626.84, subdivision 1.

    Subd. 2.Use of deadly force.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only when necessary:
    (1) to protect the peace officer or another from apparent death or great bodily harm;
    (2) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the peace officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony involving the use or threatened use of deadly force; or
    (3) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony if the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause death or great bodily harm if the person's apprehension is delayed.

    Subd. 3.No defense.

    This section and sections 609.06, 609.065 and 629.33 may not be used as a defense in a civil action brought by an innocent third party.

    --------------------------


    As you can see, there are significant differences.
    An important factor to keep in mind is that non-Cops aren't indemnified when using force/deadly force, meaning you can be sued by the person you touch (or their family). That is why, as such, I strongly advise against non-Cops attempting to make a "citizen arrest" by using physical force against a person. You can lose a lot in a lawsuit.
     
  5. TBO

    TBO Why so serious? CLM

    I need to get a clip library to preserve vids that disappear over time.
     
  6. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,125
    617
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
  7. MB-G26

    MB-G26 Bk2MiscResource Lifetime Member

    7,103
    1,200
    Oct 9, 2001
    Missing Sharon
    Just note of thanks for this thread I just passed it on to a LE noob, full academy attendance upcoming at unknown but soon date.
     
  8. steveksux

    steveksux Massive Member

    19,359
    1,821
    Jul 12, 2007
  9. agtman

    agtman 10mm Spartiate

    2,337
    87
    Feb 28, 2001
    Midwest
    I assume this is a relevant link for this sticky.

    It's a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Ohio that arose from the prosecution of an officer for felonious assault for shooting a motorcyclist whom he had briefly pursued and had believed was "pulling a weapon."

    State v. Thomas White:

    http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/pdf/0/2015/2015-Ohio-492.pdf
     
  10. white.david

    white.david

    86
    1
    May 20, 2014
    TBO, I'm not LEO but thanks for the info. I support LE but reading this brings a different perspective to this civilian.
     
  11. Wyzz Kydd

    Wyzz Kydd

    339
    146
    Aug 18, 2001
  12. Real Police

    Real Police

    297
    219
    Sep 20, 2005
    USA
    I go back over 3 decades. Its really gotten insane out there.

    If I had to work the streets I used to on a regular basis I simply couldnt. Now its common place for the gangs to plant their flag on a intersection, flip the bird at us as we drive by, and go about their business. We might shag em if its early enough and can get an army out there but otherwise? Why get yourself killed for a neighborhood rooting for the same ones poisoning their kids? And they will shoot at you, in a heartbeat.
     
  13. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    33,426
    2,842
    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    For those with an aversion to reading multi-page threads, here is a compilation of other links and informational posts found later in this thread.

    To fully understand these, you do need to at least read the first 3 posts.
    Enjoy!! :supergrin:
     
    TBO likes this.