Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Forum at

Why should YOU join our forums?

  • Reason #1
  • Reason #2
  • Reason #3

Site Description

Unprofessional cop with open carry activist

Discussion in 'Cop Talk' started by frizz, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. frizz


    Jul 6, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2012
  2. Hack

    Hack Crazy CO Gold Member

    Perhaps if you explain your question, and statement in detail.

  3. Yay! I want people to look at me! I feel special!
  4. Hack

    Hack Crazy CO Gold Member

    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012
  5. 3rdgen40

    3rdgen40 .45 fanatic

    May 3, 2008
    Professional,Courteous Police Officer deals with attention seekers.That's what the title of this thread should be.
  6. Ducowti


    Jan 11, 2009
    The POV cameraman is a total doosh. That encounter probably had him running home to punch the clown to lingerie catalogs.

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
  7. Wonder140


    Mar 20, 2009
    Orlando, FL
  8. Hack

    Hack Crazy CO Gold Member

    I looked at the video. To me it looks like younguns going out for attention seeking. They got their attention from a professional who was being professional. Admittedly I have seen worse on YouTube.
  9. beatcop


    Aug 13, 2003
    New England
    -I am recording you
    -why are you carrying an AR-15 (downtown)

    Nothing to see here folks, just attention seekers getting what they want.
  10. Dukeboy01

    Dukeboy01 Pretty Ladies!

    Apr 30, 2000
    Lexington, KY
    What I saw was two civil libertardian d- bags being attention whores and the cop doing his best to to his job without aggravating the situation. What exactly was "unprofessional" in the video, frizz? Give us a time stamp or some specific quotes. Don't just post and run.

    I stand by my original judgement of you in the first Coptalk thread you posted. You're a "concern troll." You're slicker and more low key than most of our trolls, but a troll all the same.
  11. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    What is your purpose in posting this? It's a multiple choice question...

    1. To pull cops into another OC contentious discussion with OCing GT members?

    2. To pull OCers into Cop Talk to get into mud slinging contests with LE members?

    3. To create another confrontation thread with cops and OCers going at each other?

    4. Other ______________________________________


    Sep 30, 2010
    PHX AZ
    I'm thinking the OP's post was sarcasm. The police officer in the video was quite professional. What I don't understand is why the OCers didn't walk away when the cop gave them that option multiple times...
  13. wprebeck

    wprebeck Got quacks?

    Oct 20, 2002
    Mm..looks like heaven
    Because they're *********s, that's why.

    For the record -

    Nowhere in the Constitution is it written that one must be an absolute ******* in order to exercise one's right guaranteed under that document. Too many people, including a number on this board, feel that confrontation is in order, merely to make themselves feel good about carrying a gun. They think, "Man, I really showed that jack booted thug, pig of a cop" when acting like an immature child.

    Further, those same *******s get all upset about a cop getting a bit nasty during an encounter, also forgetting that the Constitution doesn't specify that law enforcement officers must be polite all the time.

    *******s, I tell ya.
  14. dbak


    Jun 22, 2012
    charlotte nc
    Kids are gay

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
  15. HalfHazzard

    HalfHazzard Señor Member

    Feb 7, 2012
    Republic of Texas
    So the instigator's (the video guy) hands and feet are out of view. The cop should just yell, "WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO KICK ME!" and then whoop the **** out of these guys.:cool:

    Problem solved.
  16. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Jan 16, 2005
    Because, aside from being stupid POSs, their only purpose for going through town with rifles was to provoke a confrontation with police and put it on youtube. They want to show that the officer was violating their rights and to walk away when he told them they could would not create that impression.

    What I want to see is the video when a non-officer takes their guns and beats their ###es. If you've ever dealt with or known people like these (and you aren't one) you know a 16-year-old gang banger could rob them without being in serious danger.

    My best guess is, in their minds, like that Leonard fellow with the orange AK, they think they will be some sort of heroes to gun owners. They don't get that the only people who think they're "cool" when they see these videos are their fellow mall-ninja-nerds who also just recently added guns alongside their comic book and sci-fi hobbies.
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012
  17. HalfHazzard

    HalfHazzard Señor Member

    Feb 7, 2012
    Republic of Texas
    Post this on world star hip hop... then all the gang bangers that watch YouTube would know these idiots walk around with unloaded guns.
  18. jdh31313


    Dec 31, 2006
    S.E. Georgia
    I would have took the officer up on the offer to see his rifle :)
  19. jeepinbandit

    jeepinbandit Sgt. USMC

    Dec 27, 2007
    NAS Fort Worth JRB
    Cop was professional didn't seem to be bullying them or anything made a contact.

    The kids weren't total *********s but you could tell their adrenline was up and were talking at 1 million miles an hour. And the cop had much more knowledge on the law than they did and I was impressed with that :)

    Misleading title is misleading and I'm usually very pro open carry and anti bad cop. This cop wasn't a bad guy.
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2012
  20. jbglock


    Aug 18, 2012
    I'm starting to think all this OC stuff was started by anti gun activists to make all gun owners look bad.

    wprebeck, you hit the nail on the head. Nothing in the constitution says I have to be polite if you aren't. Of course people tend to equate an officer not being polite with having their rights violated. Do these states where this seems to occur frequently not have the charge of going armed to the terror of the public?