close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

tnoutdoors9 testing the .45ACP 230gr PDX1

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by FLglockdude, Aug 6, 2010.


  1. FLglockdude

    FLglockdude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    1,827
    1
    Location:
    East Central Florida
    #1 FLglockdude, Aug 6, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  2. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,450
    1,994
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Yeah this is worrisome. I don't use PDX1 anyway because of the cost. Still Gold Dots for me!

    I had hoped he would have done a second test with the 124+P without denim but he didn't.
     

    #2 cowboy1964, Aug 6, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  3. DRT

    DRT
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 6, 2001
    864
    8
    Location:
    USA
    My favorite line in the video was the last one.... "but think about it....in a self defense situation, your aggressor will more than likely be wearing clothing".
     
  4. triggerjerk

    triggerjerk
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    1,456
    51
    I hope he tests some .45 HST and Ranger T.
     
  5. Joshhtn

    Joshhtn
    Expand Collapse
    The eBay Guy
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    11,019
    4,263
    Location:
    Middle Tennessee
    Another great video!... Thank you hickok45 for letting him borrow your 30.

    Also, thanks to DRT for supplying ammo for some of his tests.
     
    #5 Joshhtn, Aug 6, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  6. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    107
    0
    Location:
    Richmond, Va
    Both of the .40 rounds he tested expanded beautifully.
     
  7. ctfireman

    ctfireman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    3,567
    14
    Location:
    Bridgeport, CT
    I've been carrying pdx rounds in my .40's & .45's & am bothered by this. I certainly wouldn't wanna get hit with a 230 grain bullet expanded or not but it's not doing what it's supposed to do. I use gold dots in my .380 & corbon +p's in my 9mm. Looks like i'm switching out my .40 & .45 ammo. Oh yeah, forgot about the critical defense in my .38 (new .38 owner & forgot i had it).
     
    #7 ctfireman, Aug 7, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2010
  8. KiloBravo

    KiloBravo
    Expand Collapse
    Lifetime Newb

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    4,934
    160
    Location:
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    The weird thing is...my buddy tested a 180 gr. PDX1 in 40 and had excellent result through denim into water jugs. However, I tested a .38 spl +P out of my .357 snubbie and it failed to expand and passed through all 5 water jugs with denim as well.

    I am very worried about carrying this ammo in anything now that I have seen the results duplicated over several different calibers.
     
  9. IndyGunFreak

    IndyGunFreak
    Expand Collapse
    KO Windows

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2001
    25,700
    983
    Location:
    Indiana
    Kinda my thinking... I'm thinking I'll probably switch back to Gold Dot... I'll probably just start looking online for 50rd boxes to save a few...

    IGF
     
  10. Glolt20-91

    Glolt20-91
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    3,932
    64
    Location:
    Arizona Territory
    The 230gr PDX on the right flunked the sheetrock test, 230gr FMJ on left is a lot cheaper;

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Other .45auto/230gr JHP sheetrock tested ammo, l-r;

    Federal Hydrashok, Hornady TAP, Speer Gold Dot;

    [​IMG]

    Bob :cowboy:
     
  11. novaDAK

    novaDAK
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    1,718
    1
    now we see why Ranger Bonded 124gr +P 9mm and Ranger Bonded 230gr .45 are not on this list:

    http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defense_Ammo_FAQ/index.htm#9mm

    Note the 147gr Ranger Bonded 9mm IS there, which tnoutdoors9 tested as the PDX1 147gr JHP with successful results.

    Not all PDX1 ammo is bad...the 180gr .40 and 147gr 9mm are particularly good loads.
     
    #11 novaDAK, Aug 8, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2010
  12. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    107
    0
    Location:
    Richmond, Va
    We cant let it leak out to the BG's that all they have to do to defeat modern hollowpoints is to wear four layer's of denim:rofl:
     
  13. thegriz18

    thegriz18
    Expand Collapse
    Paper Killer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    3,065
    0
    Location:
    Friend Zone
    Yet another reason why I will stick with my 165 40 Ranger T/PDX1. Both of those rounds work very well. The 45 wasn't designed with expanding projectiles in mind. I think 874 fps is on the very low side to expect much expansion. Some rounds are better than others and you can cherry piclk tests to prove whatever point you want, but for me it will remain a 165 40 at 1100fps+.
     
  14. Iceman cHucK

    Iceman cHucK
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    466
    0
    Location:
    WA state
    Penetration to me is #1 which is what this ammo should do well. Accuracy and expansion in a 45 is #2 and #3 for me assuming a good power factor. I carry the 45PDX1 and I also carry 45Ball. Not at all concerned with a lack of expansion.
     
    #14 Iceman cHucK, Aug 9, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2010
  15. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,450
    1,994
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Over penetration is not a good thing. I've never seen too many pro opinions that FMJs in large calibers is a good thing for defense shootings. Quite the opposite in fact.
     
    #15 cowboy1964, Aug 9, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2010
  16. DRT

    DRT
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 6, 2001
    864
    8
    Location:
    USA
    #16 DRT, Aug 10, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2010
  17. novaDAK

    novaDAK
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    1,718
    1
  18. dreis454

    dreis454
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    1,742
    2
    Location:
    Enfield,CT
    but NOT 4 layers of denim....:whistling:
     
  19. DRT

    DRT
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 6, 2001
    864
    8
    Location:
    USA
    #19 DRT, Aug 12, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2010
  20. dreis454

    dreis454
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    1,742
    2
    Location:
    Enfield,CT