close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

tnoutdoors9 testing the .45ACP 230gr PDX1

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by FLglockdude, Aug 6, 2010.

  1. Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  2. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    19,677
    2,125
    Sep 4, 2009
    U.S.A.
    Yeah this is worrisome. I don't use PDX1 anyway because of the cost. Still Gold Dots for me!

    I had hoped he would have done a second test with the 124+P without denim but he didn't.
     

    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010

  3. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    My favorite line in the video was the last one.... "but think about it....in a self defense situation, your aggressor will more than likely be wearing clothing".
     
  4. triggerjerk

    triggerjerk

    1,459
    51
    Dec 19, 2000
  5. Joshhtn

    Joshhtn The eBay Guy Silver Member

    11,300
    5,080
    Mar 31, 2009
    Middle Tennessee
    Another great video!... Thank you hickok45 for letting him borrow your 30.

    Also, thanks to DRT for supplying ammo for some of his tests.
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  6. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey

    107
    0
    Dec 29, 2009
    Richmond, Va
    Both of the .40 rounds he tested expanded beautifully.
     
  7. ctfireman

    ctfireman

    3,567
    14
    Feb 13, 2010
    Bridgeport, CT
    I've been carrying pdx rounds in my .40's & .45's & am bothered by this. I certainly wouldn't wanna get hit with a 230 grain bullet expanded or not but it's not doing what it's supposed to do. I use gold dots in my .380 & corbon +p's in my 9mm. Looks like i'm switching out my .40 & .45 ammo. Oh yeah, forgot about the critical defense in my .38 (new .38 owner & forgot i had it).
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2010
  8. KiloBravo

    KiloBravo Lifetime Newb

    The weird thing is...my buddy tested a 180 gr. PDX1 in 40 and had excellent result through denim into water jugs. However, I tested a .38 spl +P out of my .357 snubbie and it failed to expand and passed through all 5 water jugs with denim as well.

    I am very worried about carrying this ammo in anything now that I have seen the results duplicated over several different calibers.
     
  9. IndyGunFreak

    IndyGunFreak

    25,791
    1,052
    Jan 26, 2001
    Indiana
    Kinda my thinking... I'm thinking I'll probably switch back to Gold Dot... I'll probably just start looking online for 50rd boxes to save a few...

    IGF
     
  10. The 230gr PDX on the right flunked the sheetrock test, 230gr FMJ on left is a lot cheaper;

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Other .45auto/230gr JHP sheetrock tested ammo, l-r;

    Federal Hydrashok, Hornady TAP, Speer Gold Dot;

    [​IMG]

    Bob :cowboy:
     
  11. novaDAK

    novaDAK

    1,718
    1
    Apr 17, 2006
    now we see why Ranger Bonded 124gr +P 9mm and Ranger Bonded 230gr .45 are not on this list:

    http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defense_Ammo_FAQ/index.htm#9mm

    Note the 147gr Ranger Bonded 9mm IS there, which tnoutdoors9 tested as the PDX1 147gr JHP with successful results.

    Not all PDX1 ammo is bad...the 180gr .40 and 147gr 9mm are particularly good loads.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2010
  12. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey

    107
    0
    Dec 29, 2009
    Richmond, Va
    We cant let it leak out to the BG's that all they have to do to defeat modern hollowpoints is to wear four layer's of denim:rofl:
     
  13. thegriz18

    thegriz18 Paper Killer

    3,065
    0
    Jun 17, 2007
    Friend Zone
    Yet another reason why I will stick with my 165 40 Ranger T/PDX1. Both of those rounds work very well. The 45 wasn't designed with expanding projectiles in mind. I think 874 fps is on the very low side to expect much expansion. Some rounds are better than others and you can cherry piclk tests to prove whatever point you want, but for me it will remain a 165 40 at 1100fps+.
     
  14. Iceman cHucK

    Iceman cHucK

    466
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    WA state
    Penetration to me is #1 which is what this ammo should do well. Accuracy and expansion in a 45 is #2 and #3 for me assuming a good power factor. I carry the 45PDX1 and I also carry 45Ball. Not at all concerned with a lack of expansion.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2010
  15. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    19,677
    2,125
    Sep 4, 2009
    U.S.A.
    Over penetration is not a good thing. I've never seen too many pro opinions that FMJs in large calibers is a good thing for defense shootings. Quite the opposite in fact.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2010
  16. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2010
  17. novaDAK

    novaDAK

    1,718
    1
    Apr 17, 2006
  18. dreis454

    dreis454

    1,742
    2
    Jul 11, 2009
    Enfield,CT
    but NOT 4 layers of denim....:whistling:
     
  19. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2010
  20. dreis454

    dreis454

    1,742
    2
    Jul 11, 2009
    Enfield,CT