close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

tnoutdoor9's test of Winchester PDX 124+P

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by cowboy1964, Aug 1, 2010.

  1. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    19,723
    2,149
    Sep 4, 2009
    U.S.A.
  2. glocknbruce

    glocknbruce

    622
    0
    Mar 7, 2010
    Kentucky
    thats too bad...my wal mart has those in stock, too :(
     


  3. JBP55

    JBP55

    9,639
    247
    Mar 4, 2007
    Louisiana
    Judging from all the tests available.

    PDX1 = More penetration and less expansion.
    HST = More expansion and less penetration.
    Gold Dot falls between these two.
    Ranger T results are similar to Gold Dot.
     
  4. I think that is possible in any ammo out there today. It seems to be a rare occurrence, but wouldn't rule it out for any ammo, especially shooting through four layers on denim.

    I would like to see it retested.
     
  5. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey

    107
    0
    Dec 29, 2009
    Richmond, Va
    This guy isnt quite as scientific or as detailed, but I watch his videos as well. This video shows the 124 gr+p PDX1 expanded: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M283nWhLPmk
    I agree, this could happen with any ammo not just the PDX1's. I think we still need to see more testing on this round in the future.
     
  6. TWS G26

    TWS G26

    551
    8
    Dec 29, 2000
    Middle Tennessee
    Yes, I was very surprised as well. Too bad you could not hear my off-camera comments when I found the bullet. The ammo donor sent me an entire box, I have a few extra rounds and will retest at some point in August.
     
  7. jeffreybehr

    jeffreybehr Silver Member

    765
    3
    Mar 14, 2009
    Phoenix, AZ USA
    One sample does NOT a statistically-reliable conclusion make.

    Did tnoutdoor9 run out of time? Jugs?

    My results of testing mutliple samples of the .40-cal. PDX1 in waterjugs--without denim--is significantly different.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2010
  8. Preußen

    Preußen Wildey's here

    1,003
    0
    Jul 22, 2007
    Area 51
    Exactly!
    Conclusions cannot be drawn from shooting one bullet▬at least five should be fired from the same lot or box..
     
  9. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2010
  10. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    Without denim? Who cares. Just about any bullet will expand in water with no intermediate barrier like clothing in front of it.
     
  11. hotpig

    hotpig IAFF Local 4766 CLM

    Passed the FBI tests and beat out Gold Dot for the largest contract to date.
     
  12. glocknbruce

    glocknbruce

    622
    0
    Mar 7, 2010
    Kentucky
    that speaks volumes.........i wonder how many rounds the feds tested???
     
  13. Man, this still makes me leary though. I was planning on switching to these too.
     
  14. DRT

    DRT

    864
    8
    May 6, 2001
    USA
    A few points:

    1) FBI heavy clothing isn't as stringent as IWBA 4 layer denim protocol that was specifically developed when certain large LE agencies experienced failures to expand with loads that met FBI criteria. Loads that reliably expand in the IWBA protocol have proven to be reliable performers in OISs. I'm also not all that impressed with Gold dot's performance after IWBA heavy clothing.

    2) Whether a fundamental design flaw, or production quality variability, these various tests give me some doubts. While all designs will have occassional failures, seems like a few too many for me to feel comfortable with this design.

    3) http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1250492 hmmmm
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2010
  15. Mwinter

    Mwinter I'm MilkMan Dan

    1,208
    0
    Oct 26, 2001
    On what grounds did it beat out Gold Dot? If something meets minimum standards and is less expensive, then that's a 'win' as far as contracts, etc. go. The FBI did run a reduced-velocity 165gr GDHP for a while.

    With regards to tests, I'd like to see 5 or rounds chronied from a lot, then bullet from the same lot fired. When I get duty ammo for my agency, I always chrony, pull bullets, section/tear down sample rounds, etc. to try and find any problems with the lot.

    An early lot of 64gr GDSP .223 rifle ammo *sucked* through windshield glass, and was beaten by a lighter more conventionally manufactured JSP in a test I was present for. Later lots of the same product seem to be doing much better through glass in published tests...go figure.
     
  16. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1 Federal Member CLM

    24,191
    2,570
    May 24, 2000
    Beaumont,Texas
    I recently "tested" the new Winchester 165 .40 PDX1 ammo.

    From 10 yards, with my HK USP .40, it took 4, 1 gallon water jugs to stop this rd.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Shooting water jugs is not scientific, but it is fun to do. Many shooters at the range cannot believe you can retrieve a fired bullet.

    :cool:
     
  17. Glock19Fan

    Glock19Fan Cool Guy

    1,729
    7
    Mar 25, 2003
    Tennessee
    Was that denim, or newsprint?

    To me it looks more like newsprint, but I cant say for sure.

    Just my opinion, but I give newprint/phonebooks, ect absolutely no credit whatsoever. I think clay give a much better representation of what I bullet does. Cellulose is just completely unrealistic.

    Would have been much better off using jugs full of water. :upeyes:

    Sorry to sound bitter, its just I have noticed that 99% of ALL bullet failures in backyard testing happen through newsprint of phonebooks. I cant recall ANY failures in strait water. YES, bullets expand better in plain water, but at least the dont risk being clogged with paper.

    Not only that, but outside of the jug, soaked newsprint and phonebooks dehydrate very quickly. As they are left to drain, and more importantly, as the energy from the bullet pushes the water out, the consistancy goes down.

    I regularly test in my own ballistic gelatin. If anyone is interested, send me a few rounds and I would be happy to test them for you.
     
  18. Mwinter

    Mwinter I'm MilkMan Dan

    1,208
    0
    Oct 26, 2001
    G19fan,

    PM me with a ship-to address....I'll send you some ammo to shoot. What calibers of ammunition can you run?
     
  19. novaDAK

    novaDAK

    1,718
    1
    Apr 17, 2006
    It was concluded it was a bad lot of ammo. The new version (which is also now sold as PDX1 180gr) had some issues with expansion reliability in its early production runs. They had to redesign the 180gr bonded bullet because the old version (which looks like a plain JHP without the jacket "petals" folded over into the cavity) had major issues of expansion reliability through heavy clothing.
     
  20. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Millennium Member

    807
    0
    Aug 11, 1999
    Lost In Space
    When the FBI thought the downloaded 165/40 Fed HS was the best, did everybody else?

    When the FBI thought the downloaded 165/40 Speer GD was the best, did everybody else?

    Why think this FBI pick is better than anything else?

    It's the best for them based on how they test and rate ammo. I've got a copy of the RFP, and there's way more to it than meeting min specs and having the lowest price; that's not how they do it. Ammo is tested and scored, ammo w highest score gets the contract if the price is acceptable. You get the contract by being the best value, not the lowest bidder. Ditto pistolas.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2010