close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Titegroup Powder

Discussion in 'Reloading' started by F106 Fan, Oct 24, 2011.

  1. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan

    8,033
    268
    Oct 19, 2011
    The other day I ran across a load on this forum for 9mm: 3.2 gr Titegroup, Montana Gold 147 gr CMJ and 1.15 OAL.

    Sounds good to me as this appears to meet the IDPA minimum power factor of 125. Initially, I will be shooting an XD 9 with a 4" barrel. I wouldn't be surprised if I needed to add 0.1 gr or so to actually get the velocity. If I decide to compete regularly, I will probably try to get in the SSP class with a G34 that I would buy for the purpose.

    I understand the reason for heavy bullet/low velocity.

    My LGS doesn't stock Titegroup so I'll have to order it and pay the hazmat fee. It doesn't make sense to buy just a 1# can for $25 and then pay $25 for the fee. I starts to make more sense buying 4# or even 8#. But an 8# canister will load about 17,500 rounds. Kind of a lot. The 4# would be more reasonable at 8,750 rounds. Still, that's a lot of powder if the load doesn't work out.

    The question: is there any consensus that this is a reasonable load for IDPA? I know that WSF is popular but the pressure is much higher for the same velocity. I guess I could add some WSF to the order and share the fee.

    Any thoughts?

    Richard
     
  2. mknpwr

    mknpwr

    342
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    Can't help you on the load data but can your LGS order it for you? That would save the HAZMAT fee.
     


  3. PCJim

    PCJim Senior Member

    2,950
    1
    Aug 4, 2008
    FL
    Find some other local reloaders (inquire at your local range) and place a group order/buy?
     
  4. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,709
    925
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    I am not buying the pressure readings in the Hodgdon data. While powders do change burn rate in diff calibers & bulelt choices, I am not buying that TG hits the pressure wall before WSF. It's just not been my exp.:dunno: You are right though, buying 4# of powder to save some $$ & then hate it is not saving money. There must be a local shop someplace around you that carries TG. It's quite popular for some reason I haven't figured out yet, but popular still.
     
  5. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan

    8,033
    268
    Oct 19, 2011
    My bad! I didn't notice that Titegroup has the pressure in CUP and WSF has the pressue in PSI. I should have thought about the "Maximun Loads" as being a maximum regardless of the units. Duh!

    There may be gun shops in Sacramento that carry the powder but the cost of driving there will start to eat into the savings over the Hazmat fee.

    So, you're preferring WSF over Titegroup? I don't really care which I buy and buying a can of both is certainly workable.

    Richard
     
  6. ron59

    ron59 Bustin Caps

    6,927
    20
    Jan 3, 2009
    Smyrna, GA
    Buy 4# of the TG and 4# of the WSF. Try them both and use them both up.

    I'm using TG right now. Per the IDPA Nationals Survey, it's the most popular powder used there. Some don't care for it because of the increased risk of a double charge... but as long as your careful, it works pretty good.
     
  7. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan

    8,033
    268
    Oct 19, 2011
    Buying both powders isn't such a bad idea. I see that both can be used for 40 S&W as well as 45 ACP. I don't currently load 40 S&W but I do load a bunch of 45 ACP.

    I use 700-X for 45 ACP. The short story is that I used to shoot a LOT of 12 gauge shotgun and it seemed reasonable to use the same powder.

    I don't know that either WSF or Titegroup is a preferred powder for 40 S&W or 45 ACP but at least it is a way to use up the powder if I don't like it in 9mm.

    Richard
     
  8. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,709
    925
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    For minor loads, no doubt. TG has no place in trying to make major IMO, regardless of caliber. Then again, I am a TG hater.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2011
  9. WiskyT

    WiskyT Malcontent

    11,682
    1
    Jun 12, 2002
    North Carolina
    I don't see what TG does that other fast powders don't. I use the original TG, Bullseye. I don't shoot IDPA, so I don't have to use the same powder everyone else does to come in 12th place.

    I would just locate TG on the burn rate chart and pick a powder close to it that your local store doe have. The start load of any fast powder should be good enough for IDPA. You can get 850fps with AA#2, Bullseye, Red Dot, or TG and you'd never know the difference.
     
  10. nastytrigger

    nastytrigger Mediocre Member

    2,241
    0
    Apr 10, 2005
    Indiana
    I'm using TG currently, but it's the only powder I've ever used. Been reloading for just a couple months. I've had no issues with it, but I'm only doing 3.6gr starter loads with 124gr 9mm.

    I've almost finished shooting my 500rds of Berry's plated. Almost time for more 9mm, but I think I'll start doing .45ACP next. I'm going Precision Delta for my next 9 and 45 bullet purchase.
     
  11. shotgunred

    shotgunred local trouble maker

    8,743
    968
    Mar 1, 2008
    Washington (the state)
    Its 11th place whiskey not 12.:poke:

    A little tightgroup goes a long ways. Buying 8 pounds would be a several year supply. Especially if you are using it only for its intended purpose. Light 9mm and 40 sw IDPA loads.

    Look at a different store. Not all stores carry the same stuff.
     
  12. WiskyT

    WiskyT Malcontent

    11,682
    1
    Jun 12, 2002
    North Carolina
    You would have come in 10th if you used 3.8 Bullseye. 3.7 is only good for 13th.

    BTW, Red Dot is VERY bulky. I haven't used any of it yet, but 3.whatever may very well fill more than half of a 9mm case.
     
  13. unclebob

    unclebob

    7,375
    352
    Oct 14, 2000
    Mary Esther FL
    For me 8 pounds is only 16,000 rds. Not even a years worth.
     
  14. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan

    8,033
    268
    Oct 19, 2011

    I have no issue with using Bullseye. I am currently using at 4.5 gr for the 115 gr bullet. I don't have chrono data just yet but it MIGHT get to 125 PF.

    I don't think I have found a published load using Bullseye and the 147 gr bullet. I'll look again tomorrow. Between Hornady, Sierra, Speer and Lyman, you would think my books would have the load. Alliant deosn't show a load either.

    Richard
     
  15. tac_driver

    tac_driver

    82
    0
    Apr 25, 2008
    bullseye 3.5 bullet berry's 147gr PRN Brass Win COL 1.15 Avg Vel 908.5 PF 133
    2" groups at 15yds Glock19
     
  16. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,709
    925
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    Red Dot was my choice for light 45colt loads shooting CAS. It is quite bulky & pretty accurate w/ lead bullets. It runs well in the 45acp @ any sane vel/pressure level.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2011
  17. RowdyOne

    RowdyOne Constant Lurker

    181
    0
    Jul 26, 2000
    State of Confusion...
    I use 3.3-3.4 gr of TG with a 147 Berry's at 1.15 out of my Glock 34 for IDPA/Production. Gives me a 135PF. At that charge it fills just about half of the 9mm case. A double will fill it up, but not spill over.
     
  18. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan

    8,033
    268
    Oct 19, 2011
    Thanks for all the advice.

    I have ordered some Titegroup and WSF plus I have Bullseye on hand. I have also ordered some Berry's 147 gr RN bullets. I haven't used plated bullets but I haven't used Titegroup/WSF either. I guess it will be a grand experiment.

    When I was looking for powder at my LGS, I noticed that they had a G34 in stock. It was looking so forlorn; just sitting there, waiting for someone to give it a good home. They also had a G35; maybe there is a good reason to shoot 40 S&W in SSP.

    Weather permitting, the local IDPA group has their monthly clinic the first Saturday of each month with matches on the first Sunday. I think I'll stop by and check it out.

    Richard
     
  19. unclebob

    unclebob

    7,375
    352
    Oct 14, 2000
    Mary Esther FL
    :arg:
    I have never shot IDPA. But have thought about trying my hand at it. So I’m just curious why people like the G34 & G35 for IDPA. To me it seems like a G19 would be a better choice because of drawing out of a holster? What am I not seeing?
     
  20. FireGuy

    FireGuy Into The Breach CLM

    264
    28
    May 20, 2002
    Hiding In The Rockies
    The longer slide means longer distance from rear to front sight. That gives me a better sight picture at distances where the front sight blade would cover the entire A zone. The recoil is also softer with less perceived muzzle rise. Time needed to get the longer slide out of holster is not a factor compared to the rest of the motions needed when drawing.

    Am using the standard 3.8 gn of TG with 124 gn MG CMP in my G34. Added the tungsten rod and a 14 lb spring. Shoots greta with a PF of 130+.

    Have fun at the IDPA match then try out the darkside with USPSA. :supergrin: