close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Thoughts on fixed vs. adjustable sights

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by Big_Grumpy, Sep 24, 2010.

  1. Big_Grumpy

    Big_Grumpy Go Cheese!

    579
    3
    Jul 21, 2009
    WI
    I noticed in another thread some folks aren't fans of adjustable sights on their 1911's. Being in the information gathering stage of a possible first purchase, I was wondering what the reasoning is?

    I was thinking it would be better to have them and dial the sights in to POI than compensating for fixed sights.

    Am I way off base or are there other factors at play?

    Thanks guys!
     
  2. glock2740

    glock2740 Gun lover.

    18,888
    13
    Jun 19, 2008
    NW Ark.
    I like fixed on my combat guns and adjustable on my target guns. I do have a few adjustable combat sights and those are cool.
     


  3. +1. The only 1911 I would consider w/o a fixed sight might be a 22LR upper for only target/trigger practice.
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  4. asiparks

    asiparks

    304
    0
    Sep 17, 2006
    Portland. OR
    All of my 1911 shooting is done within 25 yrds max, most of it at around 10-15yds.
    At those distances POI Vs POA hasn't been an issue, I'm just concerned with getting good solid groups.
    If they're 3" below or above the POA, it doesn't really bother me, so long as I'm on form and grouping nicely.

    My only 1911 with adjustables is my Valtro and I had to have the rear blade replaced after it sheared off. That did not endear me to them...
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  5. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    9,991
    9
    Jan 7, 2002
    NE Ohio
    +2...
     
  6. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,892
    2,894
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    I like both.

    At the range, I prefer large black adjustable sights and red Fiber optic front sights.


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  7. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    9,991
    9
    Jan 7, 2002
    NE Ohio
    i prefer no dot's on the rear sight and either a tritium or FO front sight
     
  8. samuse

    samuse

    5,375
    21
    Jul 30, 2008
    South TX
    I prefer fixed rear sights. Plain black with a plain black or some kind of bead front.

    I mostly shoot IDPA, Harrison's fixed rear that replaces Bo-Mar and LPA adjustables are getting very popular.
     
  9. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson

    4,323
    62
    Jul 10, 2001
    Alabama
    My guns with adjustable sights have been adjusted twice. Once when new and again when I changed to fibre optic front sights.
    My fixed sight guns took a little more effort to get on target when new but I was even able to find correct height fibre optics for them so have not had to make changes.

    I think Mr Harrison's sights are a great idea but they cost more than the adjustables. Many years ago there was an outfit in Texas that made a "fixed Bomar" for about half the price of adjustables.
     
  10. Jason D

    Jason D INFRINGED Silver Member Millennium Member

    42,006
    1,034
    Jun 16, 1999
    Mivonks, MI
  11. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,892
    2,894
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    I'm not big on dots either.