close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Thoughts on fixed vs. adjustable sights

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by Big_Grumpy, Sep 24, 2010.

  1. Big_Grumpy

    Big_Grumpy Go Cheese!

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    WI
    I noticed in another thread some folks aren't fans of adjustable sights on their 1911's. Being in the information gathering stage of a possible first purchase, I was wondering what the reasoning is?

    I was thinking it would be better to have them and dial the sights in to POI than compensating for fixed sights.

    Am I way off base or are there other factors at play?

    Thanks guys!
     
  2. glock2740

    glock2740 Gun lover.

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    18,888
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    NW Ark.
    I like fixed on my combat guns and adjustable on my target guns. I do have a few adjustable combat sights and those are cool.
     

  3. knedrgr

    knedrgr

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,377
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    C to the L to the E
    +1. The only 1911 I would consider w/o a fixed sight might be a 22LR upper for only target/trigger practice.
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  4. asiparks

    asiparks

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Portland. OR
    All of my 1911 shooting is done within 25 yrds max, most of it at around 10-15yds.
    At those distances POI Vs POA hasn't been an issue, I'm just concerned with getting good solid groups.
    If they're 3" below or above the POA, it doesn't really bother me, so long as I'm on form and grouping nicely.

    My only 1911 with adjustables is my Valtro and I had to have the rear blade replaced after it sheared off. That did not endear me to them...
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  5. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,991
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    +2...
     
  6. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    105,722
    Likes Received:
    4,643
    Location:
    PA
    I like both.

    At the range, I prefer large black adjustable sights and red Fiber optic front sights.


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2010
  7. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,991
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    i prefer no dot's on the rear sight and either a tritium or FO front sight
     
  8. samuse

    samuse

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    5,375
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    South TX
    I prefer fixed rear sights. Plain black with a plain black or some kind of bead front.

    I mostly shoot IDPA, Harrison's fixed rear that replaces Bo-Mar and LPA adjustables are getting very popular.
     
  9. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,364
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Alabama
    My guns with adjustable sights have been adjusted twice. Once when new and again when I changed to fibre optic front sights.
    My fixed sight guns took a little more effort to get on target when new but I was even able to find correct height fibre optics for them so have not had to make changes.

    I think Mr Harrison's sights are a great idea but they cost more than the adjustables. Many years ago there was an outfit in Texas that made a "fixed Bomar" for about half the price of adjustables.
     
  10. Jason D

    Jason D INFRINGED Silver Member Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    42,029
    Likes Received:
    1,058
    Location:
    Mivonks, MI
    I don't care for guns with fixed sights.
     
  11. bac1023

    bac1023

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    105,722
    Likes Received:
    4,643
    Location:
    PA
    I'm not big on dots either.