close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Thought this might be worth a thread.

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by Norske, Apr 12, 2012.


  1. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    (Per a previous thread discussing societal organization, so this kind of appears to be non-sequitur)

    Hunter-Gatherers are family groups. They are governed by family ties. While family groups may have a "religion", they do not need "religion" so much as larger groups do.

    When mankind settled down into sedentary clans, towns, nations, empires, and what have you based on agriculture, family ties were not enough to keep differing families from acting out of the needs of their families at the expense of the greater society.

    "Something" was needed to keep such societies together.

    That "Something" was originally Religion, and now in more modern times, it is "Government".

    I break "government" down into three basic types:

    (True) Monarchy
    Secular without respect for individual liberty.
    Secular with respect for individual liberty.

    Basically, I view "Monarchy" and "Secular without respect for individual liberty" as being pretty much the same.

    They differ only in that Monarchy asserts that authority has been handed down to them by "God", and Secular w/o r.f.I.L. tries to supplant "God" with some other nebulous idea like "Aryan Superiority" or "Dictatorship of the Proletariate" or some such bushwah.

    Before you point out that the UK is a monarchy, I consider the UK system as being in the "Secular with respect for individual liberty" column since while your head of State is a Monarch, your head of Government (the PM) is not. And while the "Rights of Englishmen" continue to dwindle, they are not yet completely gone.

    I view Monarchy as the "lowest common denominator" system.

    Witness, the society of Pharoah during the time of Moses and Incan society at the time of Columbus. Separated both by an ocean and a couple of thousand years.

    Rich agricultural societies, masses of serfs/slaves/peons at the bottom, above them a warrior class, above them a noble class, above them a God/King. Both put the excess energies of the masses to work building ridiculous, opulent, tombs for the God/Kings....Pyramids!.....in both cases.

    This cannot be a coincidence.

    It is innate human nature.

    I believe that even today, mankind seeks to gravitate towards such "pyramidal" societal structures.

    The Nazis and Communists were - and are! - Monarchial in all but name (note three generations of "Kim"s, grandfather, son, grandson, ruling North Korea in the time there have been 11 different US Presidents).

    Warrior class (Red Army; SS/SD), Elite class (Communist party member/Nazi party members), God/King (Fuhrer; Party Secretary). Masses with no rights.

    Same structure. Different names.

    Here in the USA, our Democratic Party (in reality, the "Anti-Democratic Party") is trying to dismantle our Constitution and Bill of Rights and arrogate themselves into a new elite nobility from whom will eventually emerge a God/King.

    If the rest of us (as they would have us be) would-be peasents/serfs/slaves don't keep them in check, of course.

    The next Presidential Election in November may well determine whether the USA will remain "Secular with Respect for Individual Liberty" or backslide into Monarchy and pyramid building.

    And the rest of the World, with us.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 Norske, Apr 12, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2012
  2. Roering

    Roering
    Expand Collapse
    Sorting nuts

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    5,229
    144
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    Sounds like a thread for the political issues forum. Perhaps the mods can move?
     

  3. fgutie35

    fgutie35
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    2,760
    120
    Location:
    deep southeast Texas
    It is good for a paper due for extra points in your sociology class, but let me tell you of why that little pesky word you seem to despise, have to be part of every society in order for it to be a balance. One word will null all of what you just wasted soo much time in typing "Selfishness". Selfishness has even infiltrated religion at almost every level; no matter what religion we are talking about. That Eutopian World you dream off where religion does not exists and everyone holds hands and sings Kumbaya, is as real as Obama's Hope and Change.
     
  4. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    Bitter much? :supergrin:

    I seem to recall singing "Kumbaya" a lot at the every-Summer Christian Mind-Control Camp the Church my parents supported was involved in.

    I do think mankind would be much better off by growing up and rejecting Organized Religion for the silly superstition it is.

    Just as we eventually grow up and no longer believe in Santa, the Easter Bunny, and the Monsters in our closets.

    :dunno:

    But I do think we need to understand the dynamics of how societies form themselves, if we are to avoid backsliding into Monarchial Tyranny.

    Whether that Tyranny is Theocratic or some other nonsense like Nazi or Communist or American (Anti-) Democratic Party.
     
  5. alwaysshootin

    alwaysshootin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    3,749
    1
    Just remember these phrases!

    " Communism, isn't for the communist! "

    " socialism, isn't for the socialist! " :wavey:
     
  6. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    Religion is politics and politics includes religion.

    It belongs in both.

    :dunno:
     
  7. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    Both are for the elites at the expense of the masses.

    :faint:
     
  8. alwaysshootin

    alwaysshootin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    3,749
    1
    Just as the government we are looking at now, don't you think?
     
  9. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    No, we are not there yet. :upeyes:

    Are Obama and his crowd moving us towards it? :shocked:

    Definitely. :steamed:

    This November's Presidential election may well determine whether or not "Government of the People, and by the People, and for the People" will vanish from the face of the earth or not.
     
    #9 Norske, Apr 12, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2012
  10. fgutie35

    fgutie35
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    2,760
    120
    Location:
    deep southeast Texas
    We don't grow out of it, we replace them with other things like political party affiliations, or ideological organizations you feel identified with, as per the monsters in the closet, we replace them with the IRS. :supergrin:
     
  11. alwaysshootin

    alwaysshootin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    3,749
    1
    I have to regrettably, disagree! There are so, many reasons, I'll just add a few.

    What is the tally now of American taxpayers that are against the "healthcare bill"? Was it 85, or 65%? No matter we are stuck with it, and, for now, the only hope we have, for now, is a split scotus decision of 5 to 4. Are you kidding me? If it's anything other than a 9-0 vote, some of the scotus, have no clue of the Constitution! Which, they solemnly, swore to uphold!

    What of the elected officials, if the HCL stands, will be using this health care? That's right, none!

    I could go on and on, but I won't. As you can see, we're way gone, and I'm not sure we can ever get it back. Sorry to say, it was nice, and this election matters not. Romney or Obama, the path we're going down will be continued!!!!!!!
     
  12. Geko45

    Geko45
    Expand Collapse
    Smartass Pilot
    CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    16,934
    1,019
    Location:
    KCXO
    Athiesm and socialism don't go hand in hand. I'm not a godless communist, I'm a godless capitalist. I believe athiesm actually compliments a capitalistic, democratic republic as it recognizes that everyone should be allowed to find their own purpose. Selfishness is, of course, a basic human attribute within us all, but I fail to see how it is relevant here. Selfishness can certainly be cited as a failing of socialism as it removes the drive for people to excel, but I don't think Norske was advocating that.
     
    #12 Geko45, Apr 12, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2012
  13. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    Serious Question:

    What is your definition of "Selfishness"?
     
  14. Geko45

    Geko45
    Expand Collapse
    Smartass Pilot
    CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    16,934
    1,019
    Location:
    KCXO
    According to some, it's what athiests do when we reject the social paradigms they feel entrapped in and obligated to maintain.
     
  15. creaky

    creaky
    Expand Collapse
    Pamwe Chete

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    3,219
    0
    Location:
    The Orion Spur
    More pseudo-intellectual psychobabble from Norske. Doesn't the lawn need mowed or something?
     
  16. Norske

    Norske
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    3,454
    0
    If you meant to say "Doesn't the lawn need mowing or something", No, I pay a guy to do it for me.

    :whistling:
     
    #16 Norske, Apr 12, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2012
  17. Ramjet38

    Ramjet38
    Expand Collapse
    SONS OF LIBERTY

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    3,127
    411
    Location:
    Wilderness of Life
    Did you check his imigration status???

    :rofl:
     
  18. fgutie35

    fgutie35
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    2,760
    120
    Location:
    deep southeast Texas
    Was that question for me, or for Geko45?
     
  19. juggy4711

    juggy4711
    Expand Collapse
    Nimrod Son

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    3,060
    0
    Location:
    Galveston County, TX
    It is both arrogant and selfish to believe one's religion is the truth and that others must believe in it also or be punished from on high.
     
  20. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk
    Expand Collapse
    Isaiah 53:4-9

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    7,939
    96
    Location:
    Texas
    It is not arrogant to honestly and genuinely seek truth. It is not arrogant, once you discover truth to share it with others.

    It is arrogance to determine yourself as judge over someone else's slavation. That is for God to do, and not for us who cannot see as He does. It is arrogance to force someone to believe as you do.

    Hope that helps.