close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

The foolishness of Civil War reenactors

Discussion in 'The Furball Forum' started by Smashy, Jun 27, 2011.


  1. G33

    G33 Frisky! Millennium Member CLM

    28,100
    2,062
    May 29, 1999
    With G29
    What gave it away...the cell phones?
    :supergrin:
     
  2. I saw this discussed on another forum. It turned into the usual north vs. south argument that we see here on GlockTalk for the most part.
     
  3. RWBlue

    RWBlue Mr. CISSP, CISA CLM

    23,523
    833
    Jan 24, 2004
    Why is is foolishness?

    History should be remembered. If someone wants to dress up and remember history, so be it.

    I remember going to living history museums as a kid. There was one out west that had a mountain man. There was one in the smokies that has pioneers. There was one in a plain state that had different pioneers. I got a kick out of all of them. I probably learned as much from the play actors as the books.
     
  4. Spike 7.62

    Spike 7.62

    138
    0
    May 28, 2011
    I dislike the tone and language of the article. Because the author is tired of the civil war, he is detracting reenactors? I don't really understand his overall point here. Reenactors are doing the leg work of teaching the average American about the civil war. I am fresh out of school (kind of) and I can tell you that students learn nothing from class. Going to reenactments and talking to the guys is how people learn. Some of what the author said is just plain incorrect. I've been reenacting for about 13 years in 2 states with probably 5 different units, confederate and union, and there have never been lotteries or any pre-planning of "who dies first" or when or how. I've also never heard a reenacter try to correct someone by saying they are a "living historian". I've heard people use that term before, but no reenactor I have ever met would be against being called a "reenactor". Also I dont know what spectators have "paid a hefty fee" to gain entry, but every reenactment I've been to has been on public land.

    I also dislike how the author brings up slavery. Maybe he forgets that free blacks serving in the confederate army were paid the same as whites, and that blacks in the union army were paid 1/3 the salary of whites and that the famous "buffalo soldiers" weren't paid at all. Or that the north had slavery until the 13th amendment AFTER the war was over.

    Like most authors about most things, this guy needs to get his facts straight. Also he should appreciate the efforts of those who share his passion for history and who put their time and effort into this hobby, which includes educating people. This guy gets paid to talk to scholars about things they probably already know on some level. Reenactors are volunteers who take time and money away from their lives to talk to average joe blow from the street about the Civil War.

    This article is an opinionated joke.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2011
  5. goldenlight

    goldenlight

    4,996
    3
    Apr 15, 2007
    Outstanding post!

    The author of that article is, like most professional journalists, ill informed (at BEST) about what he wrote about.
     
  6. Ruggles

    Ruggles

    10,272
    18
    Jun 13, 2005
    Tejas
    I agree the article was short sighted and closed minded about the importance of remembering history for history's sake. I am sure he is in the minority with his views.
     
  7. G26S239

    G26S239 NRA Patron

    11,422
    234
    Mar 17, 2008
    PRK
    Denigrating others because the author doesn't share their interests is bs. I wonder if Lafantasie would have been happy with opening up with real Cannon fire directed at the Fort at 4:30 am.:upeyes:
     
  8. Nemesis.

    Nemesis.

    840
    0
    May 13, 2010
    Yeah. I just read about a living history wild west re-enactment where one of the participants decided to use live ammo. Shot some tourists.

    How's that for realism?
     
  9. kirgi08

    kirgi08 Watcher. Silver Member

    34,731
    3,812
    Jun 4, 2007
    Acme proving grounds.
    Don't be.'08.
     
  10. I read the link until I came across the above two quoted areas. Then I laughed at the author and closed the tab.

    Does this guy honestly think the re enactments should start at 4:30am just because the battle did? How many people do you think would be there to see it? I doubt many were there at 6:45am either.

    Apparently they should also use full power realistic explosions according to the author.
     
  11. jlh2600

    jlh2600 Game Master

    1,098
    0
    Aug 10, 2005
  12. Highspeedlane

    Highspeedlane NRA Life Member

    3,345
    3
    Jan 25, 2008
    New England
    Even worse are irrelevant writers who reenact journalism and fail miserably at it.
     
  13. Good post
     
  14. G26S239

    G26S239 NRA Patron

    11,422
    234
    Mar 17, 2008
    PRK
    :rofl:
     
  15. 12131

    12131 Monkeyboy CLM

    6,280
    6
    Nov 17, 2006
    God's Country (Texas)
  16. GLWyandotte

    GLWyandotte Señor Member

    Hey it could be worse- it could be a Renaissance Festival.
    Now those people are goofballs.