close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Teflon and bullets?

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by emt1581, Jun 26, 2010.

  1. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    I remember when I was in middle school one of the teachers was talking about the "rules" of war. One of them was that you weren't allowed to use "teflon bullets". He mentioned something about the bullet slipping right through body armor and not spreading out...then again, that was middle school so who knows.

    What's the truth about teflon and bullets? Do some spray/coat FMJ bullets and it has some armor piercing effect? Will ordinary teflon spray do such a thing?

    I've just never seen such a thing in the world of ammunition.... :dunno:

    Thanks!

    -Emt1581
     
  2. furioso2112

    furioso2112

    3,612
    4
    Dec 12, 2007
    competitive shooters coated some bullets with teflon and figured out that they chronoed faster, so used them. Somebody else tried a tefloned bullet on a bullet proof vest (kevlar, IIRC) and it went through. Word got out, some legislator got ahold of the info, made a stink about it, they were illegalized. Never one reported instance of any person, vest or not, being shot with a teflon-coated bullet. Still illegal. That's my understanding of the sitiation. Cheers.
     

  3. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    So spraying the bullets with teflon (then allowing them to dry) makes them armor piercing (against soft armor I'm assuming)?

    Interesting info. I'm not sure it's something I'd do other than at the range just to see it work. Plus in a SD shoot, I'm sure it'd mean certain defeat civilly if the other side got ahold of such info. Still...interesting info nonetheless. ;)

    Thanks!

    -Emt1581
     
  4. Merkavaboy

    Merkavaboy Code-7A KUZ769

    The KTW (named after the designers Kopsch, Turcus & Ward) is the ammo that everyone is referring to when they speak of "Teflon" and "cop killer bullets" in a single breath. The KTW was made in many calibers with various bullet shapes and bullet materials.

    The green Teflon (black teflon for several large bore calibers) material added to the bullets was designed to actually grip smooth surfaces such as glass and metal, and not to make it "slip" easily through kevlar.

    Refer to the following article in which Paul Kopsch was interviewed about the KTW bullet.

    http://www.scfirearms.org/2ndamend/ammo.txt
     
  5. SargeMO

    SargeMO

    692
    46
    Jun 30, 2007
    Teachers, quite often and unfortunately, plant seeds of 'knowledge' which isn't.
     
  6. 481

    481

    2,003
    0
    Feb 20, 2009

    No. The miniscule amounts of Teflon left after the solvent carrier evaporates after traveling down the bore and through whatever atmosphere it would encounter prior to striking a target is insufficient to induce any such effect.

    The KTW rounds that Merkavaboy alludes to are coated with a much thicker coating of Teflon that is in a solid, more mechanically stable, state and is mechanically bonded to the bullet's jacket. The trace amounts found in firearms solvents/lubes are not bonded to the bullet jacket substrate material in any way and will simply not remain there throughout the flight of the bullet.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2010
  7. Scamp

    Scamp Geaux Tigers!

    2,253
    1
    May 10, 2009
    Oklahoma
  8. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    I see what you're saying.

    But couldn't reloaders just melt/adhere sheets of teflon to the surface of the bullet? I mean teflon isn't exactly titanium. Any fool can work with it to achieve a desired purpose...no?

    Thanks!

    -Emt1581
     
  9. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    What do you mean by that? The teflon was meant to actually slow down/catch the bullet in barriers rather than help it penetrate? I don't see the reasoning/use for it....which is why I'm confused.

    Thanks!

    -Emt1581
     
  10. 481

    481

    2,003
    0
    Feb 20, 2009
    In theory, yes. But we all know how theory often differs from reality, don't we? :)

    Any fool? Well, I expect that trying something like this without the proper licensure and technical resources and experience might be something in a fool's domain.

    Trying something like this (all technical issues aside like procuring the appropriate material, achieving a bond, tolerances and load development, etc.) is also likely to land one (depending upon the laws in your jurisdiction) in serious trouble with BATFE and the .gov and may even cost you your freedom.

    Hell, even discussing it might pose a problem in certain jurisdictions. (outside the U.S.)

    The fact that KTW has done it (other manufacturers have also) proves the technology is mature enough to be fielded, but again this begs the question, "Why attempt to do so?" :dunno:


    Not harshin' on you here either; just some points to ponder.

    :)
     
  11. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    Oh I agree with you.

    I was just curious if...

    1) It was easily done

    2) It was really vest-defeating/armor piercing material

    3) Such bullets were already available (seems only a demilled round or two for collectors...but looks like it could still be pulled for use)

    Thanks!

    -Emt1581
     
  12. how would the teflon coating differ from moly coated bullets? moly is used very regularly.
     
  13. Jeepnik

    Jeepnik

    1,687
    1
    Mar 5, 2008
    So here's the question. Since no cops have been killed with this round, shouldn't the media have been brought up short for incorrect reporting?
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2010
  14. emt1581

    emt1581 Curious Member

    19,885
    2
    Oct 17, 2002
    Penn's Woods
    Of course not!! Remember we're talking about bullets and guns...and the media NEVER makes mistakes in such arenas...let alone corrections/retractions. :whistling:

    -Emt1581
     
  15. Merkavaboy

    Merkavaboy Code-7A KUZ769

    My understanding is the Teflon helps the bullet "grip" smooth surfaces at oblique angles better than standard bullets. It's the bullet's velocity, design and hardness that contributes to it's penetration ability.

    It might help answer your question if you read Paul Kopsch's statement in the link I provided. I'm not very well versed in the development and design of KTW's as I'd like to be.
     
  16. 454ThunderGod

    454ThunderGod Handgun Hunter

    251
    0
    Aug 18, 2005
    West
    Generally speaking, No.

    No magic coating of teflon or any other silly substance will turn an ordinary bullet into an armor piercing round.

    A bullet's ability to penetrate either hard surface, or thick flesh, is soley proportionate to the construction of the bullet itself, the type of materials used in its construction, and the type of bullet shape it is to become.

    The secondary condition is its velocity, of which teh requirements differ from hard surface penetration, to thick flesh penetration.
     
  17. 9mm +p+

    9mm +p+

    1,774
    65
    Mar 1, 2005
    Old Dominion
    As a matter of fact I have located some from time to time which have come home with me:supergrin: I've only got revolver calibers though have never found any of their auto stuff, fortunately the ammo vendor that had them did not know what they were and thought they were junk ammo and were priced accordingly. I readily helped him out of that junk ammo.
     
  18. DJ Niner

    DJ Niner Moderator

    15,531
    1,159
    Feb 13, 2001
    North-Central USA
    Adding any thickness to the diameter of a finished bullet is a recipe for higher-than-normal pressures during firing, and a potential KaBoom. Construction and sales of armor-piercing handgun ammunition is tightly controlled by law in the U.S., as said above, so experimentation is not a good idea.
     
  19. Atomic Punk

    Atomic Punk

    3,427
    503
    Mar 11, 2008
  20. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson

    4,340
    70
    Jul 10, 2001
    Alabama
    The KTW Teflon coated bullets go back before the wide use of soft body armor. The intent was to provide cops with AP capability against criminals in cars or buildings. At first they limited sales to government agencies but a profiteer sued them for restraint of trade to get some to sell to his survivalist clients. It took several years for them to come to the attention of the media and other anti-gunners.

    The Teflon coating improved penetration in some target materials but not all, and not in Kevlar.

    Most of the AP capability was their hard construction.
    First production was a tungsten core in a copper half jacket.
    Second production was a hardened steel core in a copper half jacket.
    The Teflon coating is not thick enough to take the rifling, these harder-than-gun barrel cores depended on the copper half jacket to take the rifling and protect the bore.
    Third production was a solid bronze bullet.


    The USMC did some work with Teflon coated service rifle bullets at one time. First trials gave the idea that velocity would be higher and barrel life longer, but the results could not be duplicated and they quit fooling with it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2010